The government's difficulty in convicting Arthur Andersen LLP of obstructing justice won't dissuade prosecutors from pursuing insider trading and securities fraud charges against Enron Corp officials, experts said.
Executives of what was once the world's leading energy trader also may face racketeering or money laundering charges, they said.
And prosecutors and the Securities and Exchange Commission may target banks and law firms for aiding and abetting Enron before it filed the largest bankruptcy in history, experts said.
PHOTO: REUTERS
Federal jurors in Houston convicted Andersen on Saturday of obstructing a government investigation into Enron's demise.
Prosecutors vowed to press ahead on Enron, undeterred by jurors' comments they doubted Andersen partner David Duncan committed a crime in overseeing shredding of documents at Enron, the accounting firm's client for 16 years.
"These are very aggressive prosecutors, and we can predict that they will continue to be aggressive," said Stephen Presser, a professor of business and law at Northwestern University.
Any securities fraud charges would allege that Enron executives hid the company's deteriorating financial condition before its collapse in December. They may also focus on off-balance-sheet transactions that hid billions of dollars in debt while executive promoted Enron's profitability.
The government must decide whether it believes Enron officials knew about important private information when they sold hundreds of millions of dollars in shares, said Christopher Bebel, a former federal prosecutor in Houston.
An Enron shareholder suit claims that former Enron Chairman Kenneth Lay sold US$184.5 million in stock; former Chief Executive Officer Jeffrey Skilling sold US$70.7 million; former Chief Financial Officer Andrew Fastow sold US$33.7 million, and former Chief Accounting Officer Richard Causey sold US$13.4 million.
"Lay took in so much money through his stock sales that he's going to look like an extraordinarily greedy person," Bebel said.
``That's going to make it very difficult for any jury to have sympathy for him.''
Prosecutors also may bring a securities fraud case focused on some of the hundreds of partnerships used by Enron executives, said Michael Granof, a University of Texas accounting professor.
Explaining the intricacies of such so-called special purpose entities to jurors may prove daunting, he said.
"It seems to me that they clearly engaged in transactions which were designed to mislead," Granof said. "You explain that to accounting PhDs and their eyes glaze over."
Former SEC chief accountant Lynn Turner, a consultant to Bloomberg News, agreed prosecutors face difficulties.
"These are the toughest cases that there are to bring and win," Turner said. "They're extremely detailed and technical."
Any securities fraud case probably would include charges of conspiracy, mail or wire fraud and either money laundering or violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, experts said.
A benefit for the government is that money laundering and racketeering charges let prosecutors seek criminal forfeiture of assets.
"They want to put as much pressure as possible on the defendant with the idea of triggering a settlement involving jail time and disgorgement of ill-gotten gains," said James Cox, a Duke University law professor.
Prosecutors may also bring aiding and abetting charges against nine banks and two law firms accused in suits by Enron shareholders of propping up Enron's stock price, experts said.
The shareholders sued Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase & Co, Credit Suisse First Boston, Merrill Lynch & Co, Bank of America Corp, Barclays Bank Plc, Deutsche Bank AG, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc, and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. The law firms sued were Vinson & Elkins and Kirkland & Ellis.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday said that its investment plan in Arizona is going according to schedule, following a local media report claiming that the company is planning to break ground on its third wafer fab in the US in June. In a statement, TSMC said it does not comment on market speculation, but that its investments in Arizona are proceeding well. TSMC is investing more than US$65 billion in Arizona to build three advanced wafer fabs. The first one has started production using the 4-nanometer (nm) process, while the second one would start mass production using the