You have to sit down for this: Japan's Financial Services Agency is talking about limiting investment funds from owning more than 20 percent of a bank or finance company. And the given reason -- here's the punch line -- is that FSA wants to ensure the banks are not targets for turnaround and takeover artists looking to make a fast buck, or yen, as the case might be.
FSA doesn't want the wrong type of people gaining control of banks. The problem is that the wrong people already control the banks, and if FSA institutes this plan they'll be controlling them forever. So once again we see that nothing succeeds like failure. The Nikkei English News reported earlier this week that FSA wanted to ensure management stability by preventing investment funds from engaging in short-term profit-motivated acquisitions of banks and financial institutions. Given the dire state of the financial sector, Japan should be so lucky as to have profit-driven investors take over its banks.
As for wanting to ensure continuity with the current bank management teams, well, this is like signing a multiyear employment contract for non-performance.
Frankly I never thought I would lecture Japan about the virtues of being more like the European Union. Yet last week the European Court of Justice ruled against France's and Portugal's so-called golden shares, which are shares owned by a government in a formerly state-owned company.
Golden shares confer the right to control management and block a merger, though the government may no longer hold shares sufficient to control the company in a conventional sense.
In effect, what FSA wants to do is create invisible golden shares for itself over the financial sector. The end result will be not only protection for lousy management but serious delays in the process by which Japan can reform its financial sector and, by extension, the whole economy.
The FSA plan goes straight to what has hamstrung Japan for more than a decade: an unholy alliance between government and the leaders of the business community to preserve the torpor of the status quo.
Want to know the best thing that could happen to Japan? That it would wake up some day to find most of its economic regulators and their cronies in the banks had washed out to sea, leaving the repair of the economy to self-motivated turnaround artists and quick-buck operators.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday said that its investment plan in Arizona is going according to schedule, following a local media report claiming that the company is planning to break ground on its third wafer fab in the US in June. In a statement, TSMC said it does not comment on market speculation, but that its investments in Arizona are proceeding well. TSMC is investing more than US$65 billion in Arizona to build three advanced wafer fabs. The first one has started production using the 4-nanometer (nm) process, while the second one would start mass production using the
US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose up to 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan’s semiconductor exports to the US to encourage chip manufacturers to move their production facilities to the US, but experts are questioning his strategy, warning it could harm industries on both sides. “I’m very confused and surprised that the Trump administration would try and do this,” Bob O’Donnell, chief analyst and founder of TECHnalysis Research in California, said in an interview with the Central News Agency on Wednesday. “It seems to reflect the fact that they don’t understand how the semiconductor industry really works,” O’Donnell said. Economic sanctions would