A proposal on Monday for the most sweeping overhaul of financial market regulation since the New Deal evoked a range of reaction from praise to outright skepticism.
But even backers of the plan, unveiled by US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, said the effort would have little or no impact on the current economic turmoil caused by rampant excesses in mortgage lending and speculation.
"Government has a responsibility to make sure our financial system is regulated effectively. And in this area, we can do a better job," Paulson said in unveiling the plan.
Although the plan was announced amid a crisis of confidence in financial markets, Paulson said it is not "a response to the circumstances of the day," but aimed at addressing "complex, long-term issues" to help make markets more efficient and competitive.
Analysts at Wrightson ICAP said the plan "would create a more coherent supervisory scheme and would eliminate some of the inconsistencies arising from today's patchwork system."
Tim Ryan, president of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, said Paulson "delivered a thoughtful and sweeping plan which should provoke intense discussion, debate and potential legislative changes."
"Treasury's three-step approach is very wise because it allows time for serious analysis, discussion and important choices," Ryan said.
But Robert Eisenbeis, economist at Cumberland Advisors, said he was disappointed with the plan.
"Despite the claim that they are not in response to the current problems, this set is like the other in that they are largely recommendations that either have been on the back shelf and/or are knee-jerk responses to perceived immediate problems," Eisenbeis said.
"Most reform proposals fail because they don't address the issue of how to overcome the self-interests of both the regulated and regulatory agencies to move to a better and `more optimal regime.' This report is no exception and will suffer the same fate," he said.
Under the proposal described as the most ambitious since the Great Depression, the US Federal Reserve would gain oversight of Wall Street securities firms which now have access to the central bank's emergency lending facilities.
The plan also calls for a new federal panel that would oversee state systems for regulating participants in mortgage lending.
It would eliminate the differences between supervision of banks and savings-and-loan institutions, creating a single entity to regulate both, and merge the Securities and Exchange Commission, which regulates companies with publicly traded shares, with the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, which oversees commodities trading.
The announcement comes as the US regulatory system is blamed for failing to prevent rampant excesses in mortgage lending that set off what is now seen as the worst financial crisis in decades.
"For those of you who think we are not in a recession, are you convinced now? Forget recession, we have jumped right into depression-like reforms," said Kevin Giddis, market analyst at Morgan Keegan.
Economist Paul Krugman said the plan is "about creating the appearance of responding to the current crisis, without actually doing anything substantive."
Krugman said the Bush administration "has spent the last seven years trying to do away with government oversight of the financial industry."
Democratic presidential hopeful Senator Hillary Clinton said she agrees with some of the recommendations but that it "is too short on action."
"Ensuring effective functioning of our financial markets is not solely an issue of how we rearrange the chairs that regulators sit in," said Clinton, who argued for federal standards for mortgage lenders and tighter supervision of "exotic financial products" such as collateralized debt obligations linked to mortgages.
CME Group, operator of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, said it would be a mistake to merge the two regulatory agencies that oversee the securities exchanges and futures markets.
"The differences are organic, not accidental, and an effort to homogenize the two regulatory regimes is certain to cause more harm than good," the exchange said.
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source
SHOT IN THE ARM: The new system can be integrated with Avenger and Stinger missiles to bolster regional air defense capabilities, a defense ministry report said Domestically developed Land Sword II (陸射劍二) missiles were successfully launched and hit target drones during a live-fire exercise at the Jiupeng Military Base in Pingtung County yesterday. The missiles, developed by the Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology (CSIST), were originally scheduled to launch on Tuesday last week, after the Tomb Sweeping Day holiday long weekend, but were postponed to yesterday due to weather conditions. Local residents and military enthusiasts gathered outside the base to watch the missile tests, with the first one launching at 9:10am. The Land Sword II system, which is derived from the Sky Sword II (天劍二) series, was turned