Attention-shy writer Dan Brown completed three days of tough courtroom scrutiny on Wednesday, acknowledging that he reworked other writers' material but rejecting claims he copied two authors' work for his mega-selling thriller The Da Vinci Code.
Appearing as a witness for publisher Random House, Brown appeared increasingly tired during lengthy cross-examination that dwelled on the details of his research process and minutiae such as whether the word "savior" should be spelled with a "u."
Copyright
Writers Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh are suing Random House, Brown's publisher, for copyright infringement at London's High Court, claiming The Da Vinci Code "appropriated the architecture" of their 1982 nonfiction work. Both books explore theories -- dismissed by theologians -- that Jesus married Mary Magdalene, the couple had a child and the bloodline survives.
At one point, Rayner James asked Brown about the description in both books of Jesus as a "mortal prophet."
"Mortal prophet is two words," said Brown. "The entire religion of Islam views Jesus as a mortal prophet. It's hardly unique to The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail."
"We're not saying you can't use those words," Rayner James acknowledged.
"Can they be in the film?" quipped the judge, Peter Smith.
If Baigent and Leigh succeed in securing an injunction to bar the use of their material, they could hold up the scheduled May 19 film release of The Da Vinci Code, starring Tom Hanks and Audrey Tautou.
Brown has acknowledged that he and his wife Blythe Brown read The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail while researching The Da Vinci Code, but said they also used 38 other books and hundreds of documents, and that the British authors' book was not crucial to their work.
Brown testified on Tuesday that he was certain he and his wife, who conducts much of his research, had read Baigent and Leigh's book only after he had submitted his synopsis for the novel that would become The Da Vinci Code to his agent in January 2001.
Asked about passages from The Da Vinci Code that were similar to those in The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, Brown acknowledged "reworking of the passage -- that's how you incorporate research into a novel."
But he denied copying. Asked about a description of the Roman emperor Constantine on his deathbed that appears, differently worded, in both books, Brown said: "I'm not crazy about the word `copied.'"
"Copying implies it is identical," he added. "It's not identical."
Literary superstar
The Da Vinci Code has sold more than 40 million copies since its release three years ago, and has turned Brown from a hardworking, modestly successful novelist into a literary superstar who tries to avoid the public spotlight.
Brown, who has traveled from his New Hampshire home to give evidence in the case, often appeared bemused by Rayner James' questioning. He buried his head in a hand when discussion turned to whether he had used a document that spelled the word "savior" with a telltale British "u" -- a sign, Rayner James, said, that it came from Baigent and Leigh's book.
The attorney reminded him at one point: "You are not the defendant in the proceedings."
"Now you tell me," joked Brown.
Earlier, Patrick Janson-Smith, who was involved with both books as former publisher of Transworld, a division of Random House, took the stand briefly to support his former employer.
In a witness statement, Janson-Smith said he "saw similarities" between the two books, but no evidence of copying.
"The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail purports to be nonfiction; The Da Vinci Code is a thriller," he said. "I thought the latter was a romping piece of good fiction. Like any thriller, no doubt it took ideas from any number of sources."
Janson-Smith said his reaction to news of Baigent and Leigh's lawsuit was: "Why the fuss? They wouldn't stand a prayer."
"I didn't think Baigent and Leigh had a leg to stand on and that they were in danger of making fools of themselves," his statement said.
The third author of The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, Henry Lincoln, is not involved in the case. A lawyer for the plaintiffs, Paul Sutton, refused to say why he was not participating. Lincoln, who is in his 70s and reportedly in poor health, could not be reached for comment.
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source
CHINA REACTS: The patrol and reconnaissance plane ‘transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,’ the 7th Fleet said, while Taipei said it saw nothing unusual The US 7th Fleet yesterday said that a US Navy P-8A Poseidon flew through the Taiwan Strait, a day after US and Chinese defense heads held their first talks since November 2022 in an effort to reduce regional tensions. The patrol and reconnaissance plane “transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,” the 7th Fleet said in a news release. “By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations.” In a separate statement, the Ministry of National Defense said that it monitored nearby waters and airspace as the aircraft