As the latest in a long line of Wall Street morality plays, the one involving Sanford I. Weill, the chairman of Citigroup, and Jack B. Grubman, his firm's former star telecommunications analyst, is unfolding in depressingly familiar fashion. But it differs too from some other dramas involving brokerage firm titans: Thousands of individual investors lost millions of dollars because of what appear to have been self-interested actions by Grubman and Weill.
The story so far: In early 1999 Weill asked Grubman, a man whose job it is to monitor by the minute what is happening at telecom companies, to "take a fresh look" at AT&T. Grubman, who had been negative on the stock, coincidentally upgraded it to a buy in November 1999. A few months later, Weill's firm helped AT&T sell shares in its wireless division to investors, reaping bountiful fees. And Grubman got help from Weill securing spots in a prestigious Manhattan nursery school for his twins. In October 2000, Grubman downgraded the shares again after the stock had lost 50 percent of its value.
Recall past Wall Street shows. The infractions and hubris of Michael Milken at Drexel Burnham Lambert in the 1980s did not wipe out armies of small investors. And individual investors were largely unaffected by the attempt of a Salomon Brothers trader to corner the market in US Treasury securities, a power play that cost John H. Gutfreund, the firm's chairman, his job in 1991.
Weill said last week that he did not mean to pressure Grubman into changing his view on AT&T, and that he assumed Grubman would rate the stock on its merits. But his argument is unpersuasive.
The fact is, Weill's request of Grubman draws him into the circle of people that investors can consider at least partly responsible for losses they incurred by following the analyst's advice. Between his upgrade of AT&T when the stock was at US$57.43, and his downgrade, at US$28.88, some US$80 billion in market value vanished.
Grubman was not the only analyst who was bullish on AT&T in 1999. This column quoted one in May 1999 who incorrectly projected a positive future for the company and its shareholders. What a bad call of mine that was.
It may not come as a surprise to people on Wall Street or those accustomed to its ways, that Weill inserted himself into the research process relating to AT&T. But that doesn't mean it looks good. In fact, it looks awful. Sufficiently so that some large investors have dumped Citigroup shares as a result.
Bill Dierker, vice president of equity securities at Nationwide Insurance in Columbus, Ohio, said he had sold the last of his company's roughly 1.5 million Citigroup shares last Wednesday. That was two days after Weill owned up to contacting Grubman about his AT&T rating.
Dierker's reason? "The quality of management is a big variable in my decision-making process and Citigroup went from having a reasonable score to having a low score," he said. "For investors, it used to be we didn't know what we didn't know. Now, I think there's a sense that there's a lot we don't know."
Weill's position at the top of Citigroup may yet be secure. But his legacy as a share manager has been severely damaged.
Bill Fleckenstein, president of Fleckenstein Capital in Seattle, said the incident showed "that it wasn't just the analysts and the corporate finance guys on Wall Street who would do whatever it took to make a buck. The CEOs did, too."
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
CHINA REACTS: The patrol and reconnaissance plane ‘transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,’ the 7th Fleet said, while Taipei said it saw nothing unusual The US 7th Fleet yesterday said that a US Navy P-8A Poseidon flew through the Taiwan Strait, a day after US and Chinese defense heads held their first talks since November 2022 in an effort to reduce regional tensions. The patrol and reconnaissance plane “transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,” the 7th Fleet said in a news release. “By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations.” In a separate statement, the Ministry of National Defense said that it monitored nearby waters and airspace as the aircraft
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source