Blame everything on Bill Clinton.
That's the long pass Republicans are throwing as the clock ticks toward the November congressional elections influenced by the sagging economy and corporate accounting scandals.
"There's no question our economy has been challenged by a recession that was beginning when we took office," Bush told his Texas economic forum last week. He repeated the message as he took to the road to campaign for Republicans.
The recession rhetoric headlines the White House's new public relations offensive on the economy. Many Republicans on November ballots also are seeking to implicate Clinton in the business scandals, suggesting lax oversight and a permissive attitude during his White House years.
"Clearly, the actions by these corporate executives was a result of the go-go Clinton years," said Republican Party consultant Scott Reed.
The issue can be a winning one for Republicans. "The candidates have now been home for a couple weeks and are getting a real front-line experience on what the voters care about," Reed said.
Bush himself does not go quite so far in blaming Clinton and his aides for corporate fraud. But Bush has cited a national hangover from "the economic binge" of the late 1990s and has claimed that his chairman at the Securities and Exchange Commission, Harvey Pitt, "was put in place to clean up a mess."
Bush's take
"After some scandals had been in the making for awhile, they bubbled to the surface," Bush said Thursday.
Top Republicans are attacking Clinton's treasury secretary, Robert Rubin. They assert that Rubin, as a Citicorp director, tried to trade on his Washington connections in seeking to avert Enron's bankruptcy filing.
Citigroup is the failed energy-trading company's biggest creditor.
Democrats scoff -- and note that the Clinton years saw the largest economic expansion of the post-World War II period.
"All I know is 18 months ago, we had a surplus," says Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton.
While Bush's team blames Clinton for the economic mess, the Clintons are taking credit for Bush's successes.
"The military he inherited performed admirably in Afghanistan, and many of the techniques used in Kosovo worked well in Afghanistan," the senator said.
Blaming your predecessor is hardly novel. Presidents often claim credit for the good times -- and try to shift responsibility for the hard times.
Ronald Reagan blamed President Jimmy Carter for the weak economy of 1980, when interest rates topped 15 percent and inflation approached 13 percent. Carter leveled similar criticism four years earlier, complaining of inheriting from President Gerald Ford a then-historic budget deficit and 7.8 percent unemployment.
Clinton made the economy the top issue in his 1992 defeat of the first President Bush. Once in office, he accused his predecessor's budget office of cooking the books to hide the magnitude of the federal deficit.
All their fault
The current Bush White House has blamed Clinton for other problems, too. Some officials have even suggested the two-term Democrat's efforts to prod an Israeli-Palestinian peace settlement helped fuel the recent Mideast violence.
"These people ran on responsibility, but as soon as you scratch them they go straight to blame," Clinton responded in a recent television interview.
"Now, you know, I didn't blame his father for Somalia. I didn't do that."
RSS