The US Supreme Court gave inventors more power to sue competitors for making modified versions of patented products, issuing a decision that extends the reach of hundreds of thousands of patents.
The 9-0 ruling bolsters patents covering everything from genetic codes to children's books. The dispute divided frequent targets of patent suits, including Intel Corp and Ford Motor Co, from companies more concerned about suing to enforce their own rights, such as Pfizer Inc and Sun Microsystems.
A federal appeals court had limited a legal doctrine that lets patent holders sue others who make "equivalent" products.
In partially overturning that decision, the high court said it would "risk destroying the legitimate expectations of inventors in their property." The ruling may prove to be the most significant Supreme Court patent decision in two decades, affecting as many as 90 percent of the 1.2 million patents now in force, lawyers said.
Intel, Ford, International Business Machines Corp, Eastman Kodak Co, DuPont Co and Genentech Inc were among the companies that supported the appeals court ruling, saying it would ward off frivolous patent suits.
Pfizer, Sun Microsystems, Verizon Communications Inc, 3M Co, Dow Chemical Co and such research institutions as the Massachusetts Institute of Technology urged reversal. That group said the lower court decision would slash the value of existing patents and discourage investments in research.
The case before the high court involved a long-running legal fight between Festo Corp and SMC Corp, makers of air cylinders for industrial machinery.
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which handles all patent cases, had put new restrictions on those who amend the description of their invention to ensure approval of a patent application. The vast majority of patent seekers file amendments at some point during proceedings at the US Patent and Trademark Office.
The appeals court said those inventors are restricted to the literal wording in the amended part of the patent and can't take advantage of the so-called doctrine of equivalents.
The appeals court said its new rule would prevent inventors from attempting to recapture subject matter they relinquished during the application process. The Federal Circuit also said its decision would clarify what each patent covered.
The appeals court ruling had roiled the business community.
"Literally hundreds of thousands of patents could have been on that Festo guillotine," said Jesse Jenner, managing partner at Fish & Neave in New York.
The Supreme Court said the lower court had imposed an overly rigid rule that ignored previous Supreme Court support for the doctrine of equivalents. Limiting patents to their literal terms would invite copycats to circumvent a patent with only minor modifications, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy said for the court. "Each time the court has considered the doctrine, it has acknowledged this uncertainty as the price of ensuring the appropriate incentives for innovation," Kennedy wrote.
The court ruled that the doctrine of equivalents is available to patent holders who couldn't have foreseen that changing the description in their application would limit coverage.
In addition, changes to one part of a patent don't affect other aspects that "have only a peripheral relation to the reason the amendment was submitted," Kennedy said.
Patent holders, however, bear the burden of proving that the doctrine of equivalents should apply in their case, Kennedy said.
That conclusion adopted a recommendation offered by the Bush administration.
Under the appeals court ruling, invoking the doctrine of equivalents was "all but impossible," said patent lawyer Jim Carmichael, a partner at Lyon & Lyon in Washington. "The Supreme Court said it shouldn't be impossible, but it should be very hard." Beneficiaries of the ruling will include some members of the patent-heavy biotechnology, pharmaceutical and computer industries.
"Biotech companies and pharmaceutical companies live and die by their patent portfolios," said Q. Todd Dickinson, former head of the Patent and Trademark Office and now a partner with Howrey, Simon, Arnold & White.
"They needed this flexibility because the technology is evolving so rapidly. They need to be able to come back later and make sure they are protected," Dickinson said.
The decision is likely to foster additional litigation over disputed patents, forcing judges to determine in each case whether an amendment amounted to a surrender of subject matter.
"In the end, I'm not sure if this will change the results of a whole lot of cases," said patent lawyer Blaney Harper of Jones, Day Reavis & Pogue. "It is clear that the lawyers will go crazy with this."
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
BULLY TACTICS: Beijing has continued its incursions into Taiwan’s airspace even as Xi Jinping talked about Taiwan being part of the Chinese family and nation China should stop its coercion of Taiwan and respect mainstream public opinion in Taiwan about sovereignty if its expression of goodwill is genuine, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) said yesterday. Ministry spokesman Jeff Liu (劉永健) made the comment in response to media queries about a meeting between former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) the previous day. Ma voiced support for the so-called “1992 consensus,” while Xi said that although the two sides of the Taiwan Strait have “different systems,” this does not change the fact that they are “part of the same country,” and that “external
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source