Two things happened on Tuesday. The US Federal Reserve cut its target rate for overnight funds by a half percentage point, to 2 percent, and the posted price of crude oil fell to under US$20 a barrel.
Crude seems to be moving in a giant inverted V. The rise started at the end of 1998, when crude was changing hands at US$8.30 a barrel, as measured by the West Texas Intermediate posted price.
After reaching a 5-year high of US$35 a year ago, the price has been ratcheting down. On Sept. 11,the posted price was US$27.27. On Tuesday, it was US$19.25.
Part of the drop has been due to the general malaise that has plagued the world economy over the past 18 months. The slowdown has been amplified by the attack on America. The terrorists may have taken as much as US$8 a barrel off the price of crude.
This raises an interesting question. Is the decline a plus or a minus for the terrorists? The answer depends in part on what you believe their goals are.
For America, the decline in the price of crude benefits energy consumers and damages some oil-producing and oil-field service companies.
Overall, I think most economists would say the sharp drop in crude prices is a boon to the recession-prone economy. The same goes for other industrialized nations.
So whom does the price drop hurt? That's easy. The decline below US$20 is a stunning reversal of fortune for oil-exporting countries, in particular Saudi Arabia, which happens to be the birthplace of most of the Sept. 11 assassins.
For those who are upset by Saudi Arabia's apparent lack of contribution to the coalition against terrorism, this is a form of poetic justice. Saudi Arabia's problem child is now digging up his own parents' flower garden.
What must gall the Saudis is that Osama bin Laden probably is having a gigantic belly laugh over the whole thing. Not only is he accused of masterminding the Sept. 11 attacks on the US, but it seems he also got in a shot at the Saudi monarchy he professes to despise.
Bin Laden and his gang surpassed their wildest demented dreams. They also punched a hole in Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates, which are ruled by what bin Laden might characterize as the fat, corrupt, and obscenely secular potentates he so detests.
Most ironic of all, it was the late Saudi king Faisal who was attributed with saying in 1997, in the context of the Arab-Israeli war, that oil is a weapon. I wonder what Faisal would think now if he knew that, 28 years later, a member of the bin Laden family, one of the most prominent families in Saudi Arabia, had turned oil into a weapon against the kingdom itself?
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source
BULLY TACTICS: Beijing has continued its incursions into Taiwan’s airspace even as Xi Jinping talked about Taiwan being part of the Chinese family and nation China should stop its coercion of Taiwan and respect mainstream public opinion in Taiwan about sovereignty if its expression of goodwill is genuine, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) said yesterday. Ministry spokesman Jeff Liu (劉永健) made the comment in response to media queries about a meeting between former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) the previous day. Ma voiced support for the so-called “1992 consensus,” while Xi said that although the two sides of the Taiwan Strait have “different systems,” this does not change the fact that they are “part of the same country,” and that “external