New fuel to clean up sea freight, but costs high

AFP, PARIS

Thu, Sep 05, 2019 - Page 6

Tens of thousands of cargo ships will have to start using less polluting fuels in January next year, a boon for the environment that could lead to higher bills for consumers.

The International Maritime Organization (IMO) in 2016 decided that the sulfur levels in fuels for ships would have to fall to 0.5 percent next year, compared with 3.5 percent currently.

The idea is to reduce emissions of sulfur dioxide — a health hazard also responsible for acid rain — by the nearly 80,000 cargo ships that ply the seas delivering raw materials and merchandise.

The shipping industry is critical to the global economy, but the pollution it generates is estimated to cause 400,000 premature deaths and 14 million cases of asthma among children per year, according to an article published last year in Nature.

Shipowners have several options to meet the new regulations.

One is to continue with heavy fuel oil, but install scrubbers that remove sulfur from the exhaust fumes, but these can be expensive and some models dump the water used to clean the exhaust into the ocean, a practice that some say could get them banned.

A second option is for shipowners to convert their vessels to run on liquefied natural gas (LNG), a fuel that is much less polluting.

So far few have chosen this option as LNG fueling infrastructure does not exist in all ports.

The easiest option for many is to switch to new fuels with low sulfur content or marine diesel oil.

About 3.6 million barrels of oil per day are used to produce the fuels used by the shipping industry. About one-sixth of the total is expected to remain dedicated to production of high-sulfur heavy fuel oil for vessels equipped with scrubbers or those that do not immediately comply with the new regulations.

“That leaves about 3 millions barrels a day that needs to adjust to the 0.5 percent fuel regulation” S&P Global Platts head of analytics Chris Midgley said.

The International Energy Agency said that the oil products market is heading for its “largest ever transformation” as refiners “will need to adapt to a new demand landscape.”

The first effects on shipowners would likely be an increase in costs. Fuels that meet the new regulations are more complicated to produce and are “two times more expensive, but we could see an even larger increase with higher demand,” said Nelly Grassin of Armateurs de France.

Even those whose ships remain on heavy fuel oil could face higher prices as refineries need to recoup costs on smaller volumes.

Cargo firms might then be tempted to raise their rates to ship goods, which could eventually lead to higher prices for consumers.

The higher demand for compliant fuels would mean higher demand for low-sulfur crude oil that is used to produce gas and jet fuel, thus it might also have a knock-on effect for consumers with higher prices to drive or fly.

Brent and WTI, two benchmark grades of crude oil that are heavily traded on the markets, are “sweet” in industry parlance, meaning they have low sulfur content.

However, crude pumped from many other areas is “sour,” meaning it has more sulfur, including hydrogen sulphide, which is responsible for causing the “rotten egg” smell and more costly to process.

“Brent could rise and test US$70, maybe break through US$70 at the end of the year,” Midgley said, compared with less than US$60 per barrel currently.

The new fuel regulations “will have a knock-on impact on all consumers who are buying gasoline or diesel,” he added.

“The general public will be impacted by the IMO regulation in two major ways — the cost of flights and the retail prices of road diesel,” said Alan Gelder, a vice president at the energy research and consultancy group Wood Mackenzie.

Any increases in airfares are likely to be more gradual as airlines usually lock in prices for several months in advance.