US Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman General Martin Dempsey has clashed with US Secretary of State John Kerry at a White House meeting over the merits of bombing the Syrian regime, media reported on Wednesday.
Kerry reportedly argued for air strikes against regime air bases used to employ chemical weapons against Syrian rebels at a discussion last week in the White House Situation Room, Bloomberg columnist Jeffrey Goldberg wrote, citing unnamed sources.
However, Dempsey issued stern warnings that air strikes carried grave risks and would require large-scale bombing raids to take out Syria’s air defense system, the report said.
“According to several sources, Dempsey threw a series of brushback pitches at Kerry, demanding to know just exactly what the post-strike plan would be and pointing out that the State Department didn’t fully grasp the complexity of such an operation,” the report said.
US officials acknowledged that there were frank discussions and debate over policy on Syria, but sought to downplay the report’s portrayal of a heated exchange with raised voices.
“The chairman has been open in saying that we need to understand all the options and we need to understand the consequences” of any military action in Syria, a defense official said.
Dempsey sees his role as offering his best advice on the implications of any military action and had not staked out a position rejecting intervention, the official said.
The official said the report “overplayed” the emotions, stressing that candid debate in which senior officials weigh the risks and benefits of policy options is “how the system is supposed to work.”
The Department of State refused to disclose the details of high-level policy discussions, but said the description of the atmosphere at the meeting was off the mark.
“I’ve seen some of those reports about the tone, which is very inaccurate,” Department of State spokeswoman Jennifer Psaki told reporters.
Senior diplomats and defense officials “are here to give the president the best advice and debate out the pros and cons of every option,” she added.
Dempsey’s spokesman, Colonel Dave Lapan, declined to comment on what he termed “classified internal deliberations.”
He said senior officials attending US National Security Council sessions “routinely debate a wide range of options to include how the military can and should support a comprehensive, regional approach to this conflict.”