Republican White House challenger Mitt Romney has accused US Vice President Joe Biden of “doubling down on denial” as the White House struggled to combat a growing storm over the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi.
The latest exchanges battered an administration repeatedly thrown onto the defensive by the political reverberations of the attack on Sept. 11 which killed US ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three other Americans.
White House spokesman Jay Carney was forced on Friday to clarify remarks by Biden which appeared to contradict evidence that US officials refused extra security for US posts in Libya prior to the Benghazi assault.
“The vice president was speaking about himself and the president and the White House. Obviously he wasn’t talking [about] the administration writ large,” Carney said.
Biden said in his campaign debate on Thursday with Romney’s running mate, Paul Ryan, that “we weren’t told they wanted more security.”
Republican nominee Romney pounced on those remarks as he sought to splinter US President Barack Obama’s reputation as a strong commander-in-chief, 25 days from election day.
“He’s doubling down on denial,” Romney said in Virginia.
“When the vice president of the United States directly contradicts the testimony — sworn testimony — of State Department officials, American citizens have a right to know just what’s going on,” he added.
Carney said the vice president was aware of the testimony by US security officials at a congressional hearing on Wednesday that extra protection for the posts had been requested and then denied.
“Nowhere in those four hours of testimony was it suggested that those requests were made essentially to the White House because that is not how this works,” Carney said.
The lack of a direct tie so far between Obama and the security situation at the Benghazi post gives the White House a plausible defense, but has not stopped fierce Republican efforts to make the president pay a political price.
Protection issues related to Libya diplomatic posts and elsewhere were dealt with in the appropriate place — at the State Department — and not at the White House, Carney said.
Department of State spokeswoman Victoria Nuland agreed that generally such issues were handled inside the department.
“I obviously don’t have any information to contradict what the vice president said, if that’s what you’re asking,” she told reporters.
The latest developments would be a headache at any time for the White House, but are especially tricky given Obama’s looming date with voters on Nov. 6.
The Obama campaign hit back, again accusing Romney of politicizing a national security crisis, with spokeswoman Lis Smith saying “the American people deserve more from someone who wants to be commander-in-chief.”
US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton also rode into the fray on Friday amid Republican claims that the administration was too slow to brand the attack as terrorism and has frequently changed its story on what happened.
“To this day, to this day ... we do not have a complete picture, we do not have all the answers,” Clinton said.
She also defended US ambassador to the UN Susan Rice, who had said on the Sunday after the attack that it appeared to be a “spontaneous” protest over an anti-Muslim film made on US soil and posted on YouTube.
Subsequent evidence have suggested there was no major protest outside the consulate and that the plot was planned by local militants, possibly with help from several outside extremists.
Clinton said that Rice was acting on the same intelligence assessments that every other government official had at the time.