Berlin Wall artists sue city in copyright row

The Guardian, BERLIN

Thu, May 05, 2011 - Page 7

The East Side Gallery is one of Berlin’s most popular tourist attractions, a 1.3km long brightly painted stretch of the wall which divided east and west for almost 30 years.

However, now the outdoor exhibition space is embroiled in an expensive copyright controversy after Berlin council destroyed some artworks painted on the wall and reproduced others without the permission of the original artists.

The city of Berlin, which owns the wall and the land around it, is being sued by 21 artists over the way the council handled recent renovation of the gallery.

In papers due to be filed at a Berlin court this week, the artists say they — and about 80 other painters who decorated the wall shortly after the borders between east and west were opened in November 1989 — were offered 3,000 euros (US$4,460) each by Berlin council to recreate their original murals after the site was overhauled for the 20th anniversary of the fall of the wall two years ago.

The artists were told if they refused to comply, an urban renewal firm contracted by the council would whitewash their work and get someone else to recreate — or “forge,” according to the aggrieved artists — the originals.

It is not unlike a London borough destroying a piece of Banksy graffiti and then getting it recreated in order to keep the tourists coming.

Many of the Berlin artists deemed 3,000 euros an insultingly low amount, especially as it was public knowledge that Berlin council had put aside a total of 2.2 million euros for the renovations.

Hannes Hartung, a lawer based in Munich representing artists in the legal action, said Thierry Noir, one of the artists who contributed to the East Side Gallery, had successfully won 250,000 euros from Germany’s highest court after a section of the wall he painted was sold to a private collector.

Bodo Sperling, one of the founders of the East Side Gallery, whose work was whitewashed two years ago, is demanding at least 25,000 euros.

Sperling and 18 others who refused the 3,000 euros and then watched their work being destroyed are suing the council. They said they would be happy to repaint their designs — for a fair price. Ever since they threatened legal action during the renovation process two years ago, their sections of the wall have remained blank.

Two other artists have launched a claim for intellectual property theft after their original paintings were recreated by the council when they turned down the city’s offer. Carmen Leidner Heidrich’s Niemandsland (No Man’s Land) and Die Geburt der Kachinas (The Birth of Kachina) by Hans Jurgen Grosse were both “forged” against their creators’ will.

The original East Side Gallery was created just after the Berlin Wall fell in 1989 as a project to bring creative minds from both sides of the divide together. More than 100 artists from east and west contributed work, forgoing any fees in the spirit of peace.