Environmentalists decry ‘carving up’ of the Arctic

DOUBLY TROUBLING:Groups alleged that a closed-door meeting was an attempt at a land grab by a group of countries intent on putting their hands on raw materials


Fri, May 30, 2008 - Page 6

Environmentalists denounced on Wednesday as a territorial “carve-up” a deal signed by five Arctic countries seeking to resolve competing claims for control of the polar region.

The agreement was signed in Greenland by ministers from Russia, the US, Norway, Denmark and Canada, and sought to cool down an increasingly heated scramble for the Arctic driven by the prospect of oil and gas reserves made newly accessible by the melting of the polar icecap.

Last year, Russia sent a submarine under the icecap to plant a national flag on the seabed to underline its territorial claims. Denmark has planted a flag on Hans island, a territory which Canada also has claims on; it has announced plans to set up a military training base and a deep sea port in the disputed region.

Wednesday’s declaration said that all five countries would abide by the 1982 Law of the Sea, which determines territorial claims according to coastlines and undersea continental shelves.

Thomas Winkler, head of the international law department in the Danish foreign ministry, said: “The main point is that the five coastal states have sent a very clear political signal to everybody that we will manage the Arctic responsibly, that we have the international rules necessary and we will all abide by those rules.”

But environmentalists said the closed-door meeting paved the way for a land grab by countries who have claims to the continental shelf at the Pole.

Iceland, Finland and Sweden, who are part of the Arctic Council group of countries, but who do not have similar territorial claims were excluded, as were environmental groups and the native Inuit.

“It’s clear what’s going on. They are going to use the law of the sea to carve up the raw materials, but they are ignoring the law of common sense. These are the same fossil fuels that are driving climate change in the first place,” Mike Townsley, a Greenpeace International spokesman said.

“The closed door nature of this is doubly troubling. It’s clear they know what they’re trying to do is unacceptable,” he said.

Environmentalists would like to see the Arctic protected by the same sort of treaty that applies to the Antarctic, which prevents drilling or military activity.

However, the Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere argued that further international regulatory agreements were unnecessary.

“Those that say there is a legal vacuum in the Arctic are wrong because the UN law of the sea convention prevails in the Arctic as it does in other oceans,” he said.

The law of the sea is unlikely to resolve all the territorial disputes in play as the Arctic melts. Both Denmark and Russia claim the Lomonsov ridge running under the North Pole is part of their territory. The Danes are seeking to prove it is a geological extension of Greenland, a self-governing Danish territory.

Critics of the meeting also questioned the inclusion of the US, which has not ratified the law of the sea.