Wed, Nov 06, 2019 - Page 7 News List

Disinformation threatens democracy

UNPRECEDENTED EXTREMES:Freedom House’s survey found Internet freedom has continued to decline globally, and China was the worst abuser for the fourth year

AFP, WASHINGTON

Governments around the world are increasingly using social media to manipulate elections and monitor their citizens, in a worrisome trend for democracy, a human rights watchdog said yesterday.

An annual report on online freedom by the Washington-based nonprofit group Freedom House found evidence of “advanced social media surveillance programs” in at least 40 of 65 countries analyzed.

The latest Freedom on the Net report said global Internet freedom declined for a ninth consecutive year, as authorities in some countries simply cut off Internet access as part of their manipulation efforts, while others employed propaganda armies to distort information on social platforms.

“Many governments are finding that on social media, propaganda works better than censorship,” Freedom House president Mike Abramowitz said. “Authoritarians and populists around the globe are exploiting both human nature and computer algorithms to conquer the ballot box, running roughshod over rules designed to ensure free and fair elections.”

Disinformation was the most commonly used tactic to undermine elections, Freedom House said.

“Populists and far-right leaders have grown adept not only at creating viral disinformation, but also at harnessing networks that disseminate it,” the report said.

The researchers said that in 47 out of the 65 countries, individuals were arrested for political, social, or religious speech online and people were subjected to physical violence for their online activities in at least 31 countries.

China remained the world’s worst abuser of Internet freedom for the fourth consecutive year as the government stepped up information controls amid protests in Hong Kong and ahead of the 30th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre, reaching “unprecedented extremes,” the report said.

Online freedom declined in 33 of the 65 countries assessed, including the US, the survey found.

In the US, “law enforcement and immigration agencies expanded their surveillance of the public, eschewing oversight, transparency, and accountability mechanisms that might restrain their actions,” Freedom House said.

“Officials increasingly monitored social media platforms and conducted warrantless searches of travelers’ electronic devices to glean information about constitutionally protected activities such as peaceful protests and critical reporting,” it said.

The report said disinformation was rampant in the US, focusing on the midterm elections in November last year, and that “both domestic and foreign actors manipulated content for political purposes, undermining the democratic process and stoking divisions.”

The biggest declines were in Sudan and Kazakhstan, followed by Brazil, Bangladesh and Zimbabwe. Improvements were measured in 16 countries, with Ethiopia recording the largest gains.

Despite the grim outlook, Abramowitz cited some positive examples of technology spurring democratic change, including in Lebanon, where people “are rallying their fellow citizens” for reforms.

However, advances in artificial intelligence “have opened up new possibilities for automated mass surveillance,” research director for technology and democracy Adrian Shahbaz said. “Advances in AI are driving a booming, unregulated market for social media surveillance.”

“The future of Internet freedom rests on our ability to fix social media,” Shahbaz said. “Since these are mainly American platforms, the United States must be a leader in promoting transparency and accountability in the digital age. This is the only way to stop the internet from becoming a Trojan horse for tyranny and oppression.”

This story has been viewed 2204 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top