Yale’s Singapore college has become embroiled in a row about academic freedom after axing a course on dissent, with the controversy fueling a wider debate on whether universities are compromising their values to expand abroad.
The Yale-NUS College, a partnership with the National University of Singapore, opened in 2013, drawing criticism from advocates and its own faculty over the decision to set up in the city-state, due to its restrictions on civil liberties.
Such fears intensified last month when the liberal arts college axed a week-long course called “Dialogue and Dissent in Singapore” two weeks before it was scheduled to start, prompting concerns the school was censoring some topics.
Photo: AFP
The course featured talks by anti-government advocates, a visit to Speakers’ Corner in a city park — the only place in Singapore where demonstrations are allowed — and a documentary about Hong Kong democracy activist Joshua Wong (黃之鋒).
Among reasons for the cancelation, Yale-NUS said students could have been at risk of breaking the law, but the row raised fresh questions about whether the Ivy League institution’s liberal arts traditions can thrive in Singapore.
Scrapping the course “is precisely why many doubted the Yale-NUS collaboration could be faithful to international standards of academic freedom,” Human Rights Watch Asia deputy director Phil Robertson said.
“Such restrictions ... handicap the quality of education that students get in Singapore and advances censorship and control that is anathema to innovation and learning,” he said.
The group has often criticized Singapore for using draconian laws to stifle dissent and restricting rights to free speech and peaceful assembly.
Yale sought to draw a line under the scandal, ordering a probe that found no evidence that academic freedom was violated and said the cancelation was in part due to a lack of academic rigor.
Yale-NUS president Tan Tai Yong (陳大榮) said the college remains “fully committed” to academic freedom and insisted it “has a thriving culture of open discussion,” but added that it has to be careful with activities that could cross legal boundaries.
As the controversy escalated, Singaporean Minister of Education Ong Ye Kung (王乙康) said in a speech to parliament that the government supported the cancelation.
“Academic freedom cannot be carte blanche for anyone to misuse an academic institution for political advocacy,” he said, adding that the government would intervene “when the situation calls for it.”
More broadly, the row focused attention on risks taken by higher-education institutes as they increasingly set up overseas, often in countries with booming economies, but where political freedoms might be more limited than in the West.
The number of branch campuses set up by institutions overseas jumped from 84 in 2000 to 249 in 2015, according to data compiled by the Cross-Border Education Research Team, hosted at the State University of New York at Albany and Pennsylvania State University.
“It is always challenging for universities from countries such as the UK, US and Australia to open campuses overseas, particularly in countries with more authoritarian systems,” said Kris Olds, an expert in the globalization of higher education from the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Universities adopt different approaches, ranging from making changes that suit the local legal and political context to focusing on certain disciplines less likely to run into problems concerning academic freedom, he said.
A number of foreign universities have set up in Singapore, which is aiming to be a regional leader in education.
Yale-NUS is the first college established by the elite US institution outside its campus in New Haven, Connecticut, but it is not a traditional branch campus. It describes itself as an “autonomous college” within NUS.
In its report into the cancelation of last month’s course, Yale said it could have led to international students — nine out of the course’s 16 participants — breaking tough laws against protests.
Only citizens and those holding permanent residency status are allowed to protest at Speakers’ Corner.
Course instructor Alfian Sa’at, a prominent Singaporean playwright and political advocate, disputed the report’s allegations that he had rejected proposed changes to the syllabus and had been reckless to expose foreign students to arrest.
Some were more concerned that the high-profile row could have a chilling effect on academia.
Nearly half of China’s major cities are suffering “moderate to severe” levels of subsidence, putting millions of people at risk of flooding, especially as sea levels rise, according to a study of nationwide satellite data released yesterday. The authors of the paper, published by the journal Science, found that 45 percent of China’s urban land was sinking faster than 3mm per year, with 16 percent at more than 10mm per year, driven not only by declining water tables, but also the sheer weight of the built environment. With China’s urban population already in excess of 900 million people, “even a small portion
UNSETTLING IMAGES: The scene took place in front of TV crews covering the Trump trial, with a CNN anchor calling it an ‘emotional and unbelievably disturbing moment’ A man who doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire outside the courthouse where former US president Donald Trump is on trial has died, police said yesterday. The New York City Police Department (NYPD) said the man was declared dead by staff at an area hospital. The man was in Collect Pond Park at about 1:30pm on Friday when he took out pamphlets espousing conspiracy theories, tossed them around, then doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire, officials and witnesses said. A large number of police officers were nearby when it happened. Some officers and bystanders rushed
Beijing is continuing to commit genocide and crimes against humanity against Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities in its western Xinjiang province, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a report published on Monday, ahead of his planned visit to China this week. The State Department’s annual human rights report, which documents abuses recorded all over the world during the previous calendar year, repeated language from previous years on the treatment of Muslims in Xinjiang, but the publication raises the issue ahead of delicate talks, including on the war in Ukraine and global trade, between the top U.S. diplomat and Chinese
HYPOCRISY? The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday asked whether Biden was talking about China or the US when he used the word ‘xenophobic’ US President Joe Biden on Wednesday called for a hike in steel tariffs on China, accusing Beijing of cheating as he spoke at a campaign event in Pennsylvania. Biden accused China of xenophobia, too, in a speech to union members in Pittsburgh. “They’re not competing, they’re cheating. They’re cheating and we’ve seen the damage here in America,” Biden said. Chinese steel companies “don’t need to worry about making a profit because the Chinese government is subsidizing them so heavily,” he said. Biden said he had called for the US Trade Representative to triple the tariff rates for Chinese steel and aluminum if Beijing was