Sun, Sep 22, 2019 - Page 5 News List

Facebook suspends tens of thousands of applications

USER IMPACT UNCLEAR:A judge also unsealed a subpoena that the social network disclose the names of apps that gathered data from its users without their agreement


Facebook on Friday said that it has suspended “tens of thousands” of apps made by about 400 developers as part of an investigation following the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

The announcement came the same day that unsealed legal documents in Massachusetts disclosed that Facebook had suspended 69,000 apps.

However, in the vast majority of cases the suspensions came not after any kind of serious investigation, but because app developers had failed to respond to e-mailed information requests.

Starting in March last year, Facebook began looking into the apps that have access to its users’ data. The probe came after revelations that data mining firm Cambridge Analytica used ill-gotten data from millions of Facebook users through an app, then used the data to try to influence US elections.

Facebook said that its app investigation is ongoing and it has looked at millions of apps so far.

It has banned a few apps completely and has filed lawsuits against some, including in May against a South Korean data analytics company called Rankwave, the company said.

In April, it sued Hong Kong-based LionMobi and Singapore-based JediMobi, which the company says made apps that infected users’ phones with malware.

Facebook settled with the US Federal Trade Commission for a record US$5 billion this summer over privacy violations that stemmed from the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

Also on Friday, a judge unsealed a subpoena by the Massachusetts attorney general demanding that the social network disclose the names of apps and developers that obtained data from its users without their consent.

It also asked for all Facebook internal communications about those apps.

The state began investigating Facebook when the Cambridge Analytica scandal broke, but the company refused to identify any of the apps or developers, and the subpoena would have remained confidential under Massachusetts law had Facebook not insisted on keeping it and related exhibits secret.

Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey’s consumer protection division had sought data on apps from prior to 2014, when Facebook announced changes to the platform to restrict access to user data.

Facebook tried to redact the subpoena in negotiations before Friday’s ruling by state Judge Brian A. Davis, but Healey’s office fought to limit the redacted sections.

Facebook did disclose that it had identified more than 10,000 apps that “show characteristics associated with higher risks of data misuse,” but did not identify any of them.

The state attorney general said that Facebook had allowed developers to integrate at least 9 million apps into the platform as of 2014 and had, for many years, allowed developers to access user data, including photographs, work history, birthdates and “likes.”

This applied not just from people who installed the apps, but also to their Facebook friends who did not.

The unsealed subpoena also says that Facebook informed the Massachusetts attorney general’s office that it had identified about 2 million apps “as warranting a closer examination for potential misuses of Facebook user data.”

That suggests that, five years ago, more than one in four apps might have been accessing Facebook users’ data without their knowledge or consent.

This story has been viewed 1951 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top