British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s decision to suspend Parliament for part of the run-up to the Oct. 31 Brexit deadline on Friday faced mounting legal and political challenges ahead of a weekend of planned street protests.
There are three court tests to Johnson’s plan, which he has said is routine, but which would shorten the time in which opponents in Parliament could seek to pass legislation blocking a disorderly “no deal” departure from the EU.
A Scottish judge on Friday declined to issue an immediate injunction to block the suspension of Parliament, but set up a full hearing on Tuesday on the legal bid launched by cross-party legislators determined to keep Parliament in session.
A separate case in London has also received the heavyweight backing of former British prime minister John Major — a fellow Conservative from Johnson’s party — and from Tom Watson, the deputy leader of the opposition Labour Party.
Major hopes to formally join the case started by advocate Gina Miller so he can argue that Johnson has exceeded his authority by asking Queen Elizabeth II to shutter Parliament for several weeks during the crucial period before the Brexit deadline.
“If granted permission to intervene, I intend to seek to assist the court from the perspective of having served in government as a minister and prime minister, and also in Parliament for many years as a member of the House of Commons,” he said.
A case is being heard in Northern Ireland as well.
The courts are being asked to intervene in what is seen by Johnson’s opponents as a power grab that undercuts the sovereignty of Parliament.
It was too early to gauge the possible impact of street protests planned for yesterday in London and other major British cities.
Advocates hoped a massive turnout could influence vacillating members of Parliament when it reconvenes on Tuesday after a summer recess.
Organizers have said more than 30 protests have been planned in cities throughout the UK.
Opponents of a possible “no deal” Brexit would have to hustle to craft a bill in the constrained time period.
Success might depend on whether a significant number of legislators from the Conservative Party are willing to join forces with Labour and other parties to frustrate Johnson’s oft-stated goal of taking the UK out of the EU on Oct. 31 regardless of whether a deal is in place.
Shami Chakrabarti, a senior adviser to the Labour Party on justice issues, told BBC radio that she is hopeful there is enough opposition in Parliament to block Johnson from carrying out a “no deal” departure.
“If they try any more of this stuff we will use any means necessary to prevent this undemocratic behavior — that includes people taking to the streets, that includes people taking to the airwaves, that includes people going to court.”
In Scotland, Judge Raymond Doherty turned down a bid for an immediate intervention, but said a “substantive” hearing on Tuesday would allow the case to be heard in a timely fashion.
He did agree to move the full hearing from Friday to Tuesday to speed up the process.
“It’s in the interest of justice that it proceeds sooner rather than later,” he said.
The case was brought by a cross-party group of about 70 legislators seeking to broaden the period for parliamentary debate in a bid to prevent a disorderly departure from the EU.
The legislators backing the legal bid want Johnson to submit a sworn affidavit explaining his reasons for suspending Parliament. It is not clear if such a statement will be required.
The defiant British prime minister on Friday said that opposition to his plans is weakening the UK’s negotiating position by giving EU leaders the impression that Parliament might step in to block Brexit.
“I’m afraid that the more our friends and partners think, at the back of their mind, that Brexit could be stopped, that the UK could be kept in by Parliament, the less likely they are to give us the deal that we need,” Johnson told Sky News.
POINT-BLANK RANGE: Reporters and camera people from several outlets say police officers in Minneapolis had fired tear gas and rubber bullets directly at them Multiple journalists on the ground in Minnesota said they were teargassed and subject to other attacks by police on Saturday evening, a day after the widely condemned arrest of a CNN reporter live on air. Los Angeles Times journalist Molly Hennessy-Fiske, who was reporting outside the Fifth Precinct in Minneapolis, said she was with a group of about a dozen journalists when the Minnesota State Patrol “fired tear gas canisters on us at point blank range.” “I was saying: ‘Where do we go?’ They did not tell us where to go. They didn’t direct us. They just fired on us,” she said
For nearly a decade, the UN Security Council has been frequently paralyzed by Russia’s obstinacy over the Syrian crisis. Today, however, it is the US-China rivalry that has infected a growing array of issues, according to officials and diplomats. As recently as 2017, an understanding between Washington and Beijing allowed the UN on three occasions — involving separate sets of economic sanctions — to project international unity in the face of the North Korean nuclear threat. Three years later, the COVID-19 pandemic has seen a ferocious competition erupt between the UN’s two main contributors, prompting UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on May
INDIA Pride to be preserved The nation would not let its “pride be hurt” in its latest border flare-ups with China, but is determined to settle the dispute through talks, Minister of Defense Rajnath Singh said in a television interview late on Saturday. “Situations arise with China. It has happened before,” Singh said, adding that the government was striving to make sure “tension does not escalate.” The government has turned down US President Donald Trump’s offer to mediate, he said. IRAN Speaker says talks futile Newly elected Parliament Speaker Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf yesterday said that any negotiations with the US would be “futile.” The nation’s
PANDEMIC BIGOTRY? The convener of a community group said that COVID-19 did not cause racism in Australia, but the incidents were a symptom of a bigger issue Anti-Discrimination New South Wales (NSW) has recorded a surge in anti-Asian racism during the COVID-19 pandemic. The state anti-discrimination body said that it received 241 official complaints from Jan. 1 to April 30. Of those, 62 were on the grounds of race — an average of four complaints a week — including reports of people being abused or spat at in public, harassed for wearing a mask and car windows being smashed. Those statistics do not include more serious complaints referred to the NSW police, rather than Anti-Discrimination NSW. Anti-Discrimination NSW president Annabelle Bennett said that the agency had experienced an “increase in