The EU has called on Facebook and other platforms to invest more in fact-checking, but a study shows that those efforts might rarely reach the communities worst affected by fake news.
The analysis by big-data firm Alto Data Analytics over a three-month period ahead of this year’s EU elections cast doubt on the effectiveness of fact-checking, even as demand for it is growing.
Facebook over the past year has quadrupled the number of fact-checking groups it works with worldwide and its subsidiary WhatsApp launched its first fact-checking service.
The EU, which has expanded its own fact-checking team, urged online platforms to take greater action or risk regulation.
Fact-checkers are often journalists who set up nonprofits or work at mainstream media outlets to scour the Web for viral falsehoods.
Their rebuttals in the form of articles, blog posts and tweets seek to explain how statements fail to hold up to scrutiny, images are doctored or videos are taken out of context.
However, there is little independent research on their success in debunking fake news or preventing people from sharing it.
“The biggest problem is that we have very little data ... on the efficacy of various fact-checking initiatives,” said Nahema Marchal, a researcher at the Oxford Internet Institute. “We know from a research perspective that fact-checking isn’t always as efficient as we might think.”
Alto looked at more than two dozen fact-checking groups in five EU nations and found they had a minimal online presence — making up 0.1 to 0.3 percent of the total number of retweets, replies and mentions analyzed on Twitter from December last year to March.
The study points to a problem fact-checkers have long suspected: They are often preaching to the choir.
Alto analyzed abnormal, hyperactive users making dozens of posts per day to deduce which political communities were most tainted by suspect posts in each country.
Less than 1 percent of users — mostly sympathetic to populist and far-right parties — generated about 10 percent of the total posts related to politics.
They flooded networks with anti-immigration, anti-Islam and anti-establishment messages, Alto found in results that echoed separate studies by campaign group Avaaz and the Oxford Internet Institute.
Fact-checkers had little penetration in those same communities.
In Poland — where junk news made up 21 percent of traffic compared with an average of 4 percent circulating on Twitter in seven major European languages more than one month before the vote, according to the Oxford study — content issued by fact-checkers was mainly shared among those opposed to the ruling Law and Justice Party.
Italy and Spain also saw content from fact-checkers unevenly spread across political communities.
More than half of the retweets, mentions or replies to posts shared by seven Italian fact-checking groups — mostly related to immigration — came from users sympathetic to the center-left Democratic Party.
Only two of the seven groups had any relatively sizeable footprint among supporters of Italian Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini’s far-right League party, which surged to become the third-biggest in the European Parliament.
French fact-checking groups, which are mostly embedded in mainstream media, fared better. Their content was the most evenly distributed across different online communities.
In Germany, only 2.2 percent of Twitter users mapped in the study retweeted, replied or mentioned the content distributed by six fact-checking groups.
Alto’s research faces constraints. The focus on publicly available Twitter data might not accurately reflect the whole online conversation across various platforms, the period of the study stops short of the May elections and there are areas of dispute over what constitutes disinformation. It also lacks data from Facebook.
As the rapid spread of fake news on social media has raised the profile of fact-checking groups, it is forcing them to rethink how they work.
If they once focused on holding politicians to account, fact-checkers are now seeking to influence a wider audience.
Clara Jimenez, cofounder Maldita.es, a Spanish fact-checking group partnered with Facebook, mimics the methods used by those spreading false news. That means going viral with memes and videos.
Maldita.es focuses largely on WhatsApp and asks people to send fact-checks back to those in their networks who first spread the fake news.
“You need to try reach real people,” said Jimenez, who also aims to promote better media literacy. “One of the things we have been asked several times is whether people can get pregnant from a mosquito bite. If people believe that, we have a bigger issue.”
SEEKING CHANGE: A hospital worker said she did not vote in previous elections, but ‘now I can see that maybe my vote can change the system and the country’ Voting closed yesterday across the Solomon Islands in the south Pacific nation’s first general election since the government switched diplomatic allegiance from Taiwan to Beijing and struck a secret security pact that has raised fears of the Chinese navy gaining a foothold in the region. The Solomon Islands’ closer relationship with China and a troubled domestic economy weighed on voters’ minds as they cast their ballots. As many as 420,000 registered voters had their say across 50 national seats. For the first time, the national vote also coincided with elections for eight of the 10 local governments. Esther Maeluma cast her vote in the
Nearly half of China’s major cities are suffering “moderate to severe” levels of subsidence, putting millions of people at risk of flooding, especially as sea levels rise, according to a study of nationwide satellite data released yesterday. The authors of the paper, published by the journal Science, found that 45 percent of China’s urban land was sinking faster than 3mm per year, with 16 percent at more than 10mm per year, driven not only by declining water tables, but also the sheer weight of the built environment. With China’s urban population already in excess of 900 million people, “even a small portion
UNSETTLING IMAGES: The scene took place in front of TV crews covering the Trump trial, with a CNN anchor calling it an ‘emotional and unbelievably disturbing moment’ A man who doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire outside the courthouse where former US president Donald Trump is on trial has died, police said yesterday. The New York City Police Department (NYPD) said the man was declared dead by staff at an area hospital. The man was in Collect Pond Park at about 1:30pm on Friday when he took out pamphlets espousing conspiracy theories, tossed them around, then doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire, officials and witnesses said. A large number of police officers were nearby when it happened. Some officers and bystanders rushed
HYPOCRISY? The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday asked whether Biden was talking about China or the US when he used the word ‘xenophobic’ US President Joe Biden on Wednesday called for a hike in steel tariffs on China, accusing Beijing of cheating as he spoke at a campaign event in Pennsylvania. Biden accused China of xenophobia, too, in a speech to union members in Pittsburgh. “They’re not competing, they’re cheating. They’re cheating and we’ve seen the damage here in America,” Biden said. Chinese steel companies “don’t need to worry about making a profit because the Chinese government is subsidizing them so heavily,” he said. Biden said he had called for the US Trade Representative to triple the tariff rates for Chinese steel and aluminum if Beijing was