It sounds like something from the outer reaches of science fiction: battlefield robots waging constant war, algorithms that determine who to kill, face-recognition fighting machines that can ID a target and take it out before you have time to say “Geneva Conventions.”
This is no film script, however, but an ominous picture of future warfare that is moving ever closer.
“Killer robots” is shorthand for a range of tech that has generals salivating and peace campaigners terrified at the ethical ramifications of warfare waged via digital proxies.
Now, two women armed with nothing more than a Nobel prize, knowhow and a lot of conviction are standing in front of the march of deadly killer robots. They want them banned. And they have done this kind of thing before.
Jody Williams won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1997 for leading the long, global effort to get anti-personnel landmines banned. Mary Wareham was a prominent supporter in that campaign.
“We were there at the Nobel peace prize ceremony, and I said to Jody, ‘This is how you finish your career, not start it! What are we going to do now?’” Wareham said.
The answer? Lethal autonomous weapon systems, also known as LAWs. The women expect the struggle to be far harder.
“In relative terms, landmines are chump change,” Williams said, pointing to the billions of dollars manufacturers could make selling artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced weapons.
The big question is: What would stop armies from deploying upgraded drone bots to search for, identify, and then take out every man in a village between the ages of 18 and 50? Or to send a killer drone to ID and assassinate a head of state?
Weapons manufacturers are riding the same artificial intelligence wave as other industries. Militaries, eyeing each other in a quiet but fierce arms race, are funding some of the most cutting-edge trials.
To some, the advantages are clear: Killer robots would never fatigue like a human soldier. They could potentially stay out on the battlefield for months. They would never get angry or seek revenge. They would never defy an officer’s orders. They would remove the imperfect human from the equation. Algorithms would determine who to kill.
However, some military experts have expressed concerns.
“There are not only legal and ethical concerns about lethal autonomy, but practical ones as well,” said Paul Scharre, a former US
Army Ranger who wrote the Pentagon’s earliest policy statement on killer robots. “How does one control an autonomous weapon? What happens if there’s a glitch in the system or someone hacks it?”
To Williams, the machines represent the very definition of cold-blooded slaughter. With killer robots, World War III would allow little space for what shred of humanity surfaces in wars.
“It’s men getting hard-ons over new weapons,” Williams said. “They’re doing it simply because they can. They’re doing it because they want to see where it can go.”
Israel already has some of the most advanced machines, including an armed ground robot that has patrolled the Gaza border and the Harpy, a missile that circles the skies until it finds its target.
Marketed ostensibly to destroy enemy radars, no technical barriers exist to stop engineers in the industry from developing similar weapons that would one day attack people.
In the valleys of central California, the US military is running drone swarm experiments. Russia has declared its desire to form an entire battalion of killer robots. No one really knows what China is doing.
No law governs this AI arms race. Countries currently face a free-for-all.
Scientists have sounded the alarm, and more than 250 research and academic institutions and 3,000 prominent players in the field have called for a ban on killer robots.
However, beyond a petition, activists reckon the best way to stop this technology in its tracks is through the tedious, unheroic task of passing an international treaty.
That is the strategy of the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots (CSKR). More than 100 organizations in 54 countries have joined the coalition, with the aim of getting a deal by 2021.
Williams is an idealist, but she is not naive. She has battled the military-industrial complex since her days protesting the Vietnam War. Sceptics had thought banning landmines would be impossible.
“Anything is inevitable if you do nothing to stop it,” she said. “When they were drumming that at us — ‘it’s inevitable, it’s inevitable’ — the reason people do that is to disempower you.”
In that campaign, Williams and others had lobbied the UN to pass an agreement. When that process flagged, they took negotiations outside the UN framework and began corralling countries on board, one by one, until a historic deal in Ottawa in 1997, when more than 120 nations committed to eradicating anti-personnel landmines.
Today, the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots is following a similar roadmap. The UN has held several rounds of talks in Geneva, including a session at the end of last month.
Williams and Wareham hope Germany will take the lead.
The country joined the UN Security Council at the start of the year, and German Minister of Foreign Affairs Heiko Maas recently called killer robots “nothing less than an attack on humanity itself.”
Behind the scenes, Berlin has reached out to other states to push for more progress.
Some German politicians recognize it has the opportunity to be the first country to ban killer robots and if it does, other European states would follow suit.
CONFRONTATION: The water cannon attack was the second this month on the Philippine supply boat ‘Unaizah May 4,’ after an incident on March 5 The China Coast Guard yesterday morning blocked a Philippine supply vessel and damaged it with water cannons near a reef off the Southeast Asian country, the Philippines said. The Philippine military released video of what it said was a nearly hour-long attack off the Second Thomas Shoal (Renai Shoal, 仁愛暗沙) in the contested South China Sea, where Chinese ships have unleashed water cannons and collided with Philippine vessels in similar standoffs in the past few months. The China Coast Guard and other vessels “once again harassed, blocked, deployed water cannons, and executed dangerous maneuvers” against a routine rotation and resupply mission to
GLOBAL COMBAT AIR PROGRAM: The potential purchasers would be limited to the 15 nations with which Tokyo has signed defense partnership and equipment transfer deals Japan’s Cabinet yesterday approved a plan to sell future next-generation fighter jets that it is developing with the UK and Italy to other nations, in the latest move away from the country’s post-World War II pacifist principles. The contentious decision to allow international arms sales is expected to help secure Japan’s role in the joint fighter jet project, and is part of a move to build up the Japanese arms industry and bolster its role in global security. The Cabinet also endorsed a revision to Japan’s arms equipment and technology transfer guidelines to allow coproduced lethal weapons to be sold to nations
‘POLITICAL EARTHQUAKE’: Leo Varadkar said he was ‘no longer the best person’ to lead the nation and was stepping down for political, as well as personal, reasons Leo Varadkar on Wednesday announced that he was stepping down as Ireland’s prime minister and leader of the Fine Gael party in the governing coalition, citing “personal and political” reasons. Pundits called the surprise move, just 10 weeks before Ireland holds European Parliament and local elections, a “political earthquake.” A general election has to be held within a year. Irish Deputy Prime Minister Micheal Martin, leader of Fianna Fail, the main coalition partner, said Varadkar’s announcement was “unexpected,” but added that he expected the government to run its full term. An emotional Varadkar, who is in his second stint as prime minister and at
Thousands of devotees, some in a state of trance, gathered at a Buddhist temple on the outskirts of Bangkok renowned for sacred tattoos known as Sak Yant, paying their respects to a revered monk who mastered the practice and seeking purification. The gathering at Wat Bang Phra Buddhist temple is part of a Thai Wai Khru ritual in which devotees pay homage to Luang Phor Pern, the temple’s formal abbot, who died in 2002. He had a reputation for refining and popularizing the temple’s Sak Yant tattoo style. The idea that tattoos confer magical powers has existed in many parts of Asia