British Prime Minister Theresa May’s government on Monday fought to defend its Brexit deal by outlining the legal basis for parliament to support its plan to leave the EU, but instead seemed to fan the flames of rebellion.
May faces an uphill struggle to secure parliament’s approval in a vote on Tuesday next week, when many Brexit supporters and opponents alike have said that they would reject her vision for leaving the EU, Britain’s biggest shift in foreign policy in more than 40 years.
She has toured the country and TV studios to try to sell her deal, but a move on Monday to present her government’s legal advice to parliament seemed to backfire.
After a complaint presented by a group of cross-party lawmakers, British House of Commons Speaker John Bercow said that he believed it could be argued that a contempt had been committed because of the failure to release the full legal advice.
The issue was yesterday to be taken up again in parliament, Bercow said.
It was a threat that one government source shrugged off as just a “process row.”
At a rowdy session of parliament, Attorney General for England and Wales Geoffrey Cox outlined the legal advice he had given to the government, including over a “backstop” arrangement to prevent the return of a hard border between Northern Ireland and EU member state Ireland if a future UK-EU trading deal is not reached in time.
“This deal ... is the best way, I firmly believe, of ensuring that we leave the European Union on March 29,” Cox told parliament. “This is the deal that will ensure that happening in an orderly way with legal certainty.”
However, his words did little to soothe some of the deal’s most caustic critics, while many Brexit supporters said that the so-called backstop for Northern Ireland risked tying Britain into the EU’s customs union indefinitely.
“The legal summary document is worse than we feared: The backstop customs union is indefinite, the UK would be a rule taker and the European Court [of Justice] is in charge of our destiny, rather than the sovereign UK parliament,” former British secretary of state for exiting the EU David Davis said. “This is not Brexit.”
May’s Northern Irish allies, the Democratic Unionist Party, which prop up her minority government, went further, with deputy leader Nigel Dodds saying: “The overall context of this is ... a deeply unattractive, unsatisfactory presentation and he [Cox] needs to therefore, rather than recommend this agreement, recommend that it is rejected.”
Many lawmakers were also angry over being shown what they described as a summary, not the full legal advice on May’s Brexit deal that her government had seen.
The Labour Party and others, including the Democratic Unionist Party, said that the vote is so important for the future of the country that lawmakers should be able to see any detailed legal warnings concerning parts of the withdrawal agreement.
“We have therefore been left with no option, but to write to the speaker of the House of Commons to ask him to launch proceedings of contempt,” Labour’s Brexit spokesman Keir Starmer said.
The proceedings against the government for contempt of parliament could potentially result in one or more ministers being suspended or expelled from the House of Commons.
Cox said that he could not disclose all the advice for fear of it being “contrary to the interests in the country,” going so far as to shout at Labour lawmakers that it was no use “baying and shouting” when he was trying to guard the public interest.
“That is all and it is time they grew up and got real,” he said.
Monday’s angry session of parliament did not bode well for next week’s vote, which is to come at the end of five days of bruising debate starting yesterday.
If she loses, May could call for a second vote, but defeat would increase the chances of Britain leaving without a deal — a possibility that could mean chaos for Britain’s economy and businesses — and put May under fierce pressure to resign.
Defeat could also make it more likely that Britain holds a second EU referendum, three years after voting narrowly to leave the bloc.
Nearly half of China’s major cities are suffering “moderate to severe” levels of subsidence, putting millions of people at risk of flooding, especially as sea levels rise, according to a study of nationwide satellite data released yesterday. The authors of the paper, published by the journal Science, found that 45 percent of China’s urban land was sinking faster than 3mm per year, with 16 percent at more than 10mm per year, driven not only by declining water tables, but also the sheer weight of the built environment. With China’s urban population already in excess of 900 million people, “even a small portion
UNSETTLING IMAGES: The scene took place in front of TV crews covering the Trump trial, with a CNN anchor calling it an ‘emotional and unbelievably disturbing moment’ A man who doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire outside the courthouse where former US president Donald Trump is on trial has died, police said yesterday. The New York City Police Department (NYPD) said the man was declared dead by staff at an area hospital. The man was in Collect Pond Park at about 1:30pm on Friday when he took out pamphlets espousing conspiracy theories, tossed them around, then doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire, officials and witnesses said. A large number of police officers were nearby when it happened. Some officers and bystanders rushed
Beijing is continuing to commit genocide and crimes against humanity against Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities in its western Xinjiang province, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a report published on Monday, ahead of his planned visit to China this week. The State Department’s annual human rights report, which documents abuses recorded all over the world during the previous calendar year, repeated language from previous years on the treatment of Muslims in Xinjiang, but the publication raises the issue ahead of delicate talks, including on the war in Ukraine and global trade, between the top U.S. diplomat and Chinese
HYPOCRISY? The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday asked whether Biden was talking about China or the US when he used the word ‘xenophobic’ US President Joe Biden on Wednesday called for a hike in steel tariffs on China, accusing Beijing of cheating as he spoke at a campaign event in Pennsylvania. Biden accused China of xenophobia, too, in a speech to union members in Pittsburgh. “They’re not competing, they’re cheating. They’re cheating and we’ve seen the damage here in America,” Biden said. Chinese steel companies “don’t need to worry about making a profit because the Chinese government is subsidizing them so heavily,” he said. Biden said he had called for the US Trade Representative to triple the tariff rates for Chinese steel and aluminum if Beijing was