Tue, Sep 04, 2018 - Page 6 News List

Chagos ‘colony’ case opens at ICJ

‘ADVISORY OPINION’:Mauritius, which declared independence in 1968, says it was illegal for the UK to break up its territory while still under colonial rule

AFP, THE HAGUE, Netherlands

Protesters hold a placard and banners outside the International Court of Justice in The Hague, Netherlands, yesterday.

Photo: AP

The UN’s top court yesterday started to hear arguments on the future status of the British-ruled Chagos Islands, home to a strategic joint US military base, but a territory claimed by Mauritius.

Port Louis opened four days of hearings before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in a case brought by the UN over the Indian Ocean archipelago, which has been the center of a dispute for more than five decades.

In a diplomatic blow to Britain, the UN General Assembly in June last year adopted a resolution presented by Mauritius and backed by African nations asking The Hague-based ICJ to offer a legal opinion on the island chain’s fate.

The ICJ’s 15 judges are to listen to arguments on the “legal consequences of [Britain’s] separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius” in 1965, shortly before Port Louis’ independence from its colonial ruler.

The African Union and 22 countries — which includes the US, Germany and several Asian and Latin American nations — are to make statements during the four-day hearing.

After the hearings, the ICJ is to hand down a non-binding “advisory opinion,” but the judges’ ruling might take several months or even years.

An opinion in favor of Mauritius might strengthen Port Louis’ hand in negotiations or could lay the foundation for an eventual formal claim before the ICJ — set up in 1946 and which also rules in disputes between countries.

Mauritius, which declared independence in 1968, argues that it was illegal for London to break up its territory while still under colonial rule.

Britain detached the islands from Mauritius, then a semi-autonomous British territory, using decolonization talks as leverage and paying £3 million (US$3.86 million at the current exchange rate) for them at the time.

As the Cold War with the former Soviet Union intensified, London established a combined military base with the US on Diego Garcia, the largest of the islands.

The Indian Ocean base plays a key strategic role in US military operations.

In the 1970s, it offered proximity to Asia during the fall of Saigon (now Ho Chi Minh City) and the Khmer Rouge takeover in Cambodia, and as the Soviet navy extended its influence in the region.

In recent years it has served as a staging ground for US bombing campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Britain in the early 1970s also evicted the archipelago’s residents — about 2,000 in total — to Mauritius and the Seychelles to make way for the base.

A UK diplomat in a cable at the time described it as the removal of “some few Tarzans and Man Fridays,” and islanders have not been allowed to return since because of security reasons.

Last year’s vote before the UN whether to refer the matter to the ICJ was also seen as a test for Britain’s ability to rally support from fellow Europeans at the world body, a year after its shock vote to leave the EU.

The matter was passed 95-15, with 65 abstentions — most by European member states, including France, Italy and Spain.

London, ahead of yesterday’s hearings, pledged to mount a “robust defense,” saying that the move was bound to hurt relations with Port Louis.

Mauritius on the other hand, said it wants to “eliminate colonialism” and that its independence would not be complete without getting back the Chagos Islands.

However, Port Louis did say it recognized “the existence of the base and accepts its continued and future functioning in accordance with international law.”

This story has been viewed 2018 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top