Wed, Jul 04, 2018 - Page 7 News List

Europe’s rivers, lakes fail quality tests

LACKING POLITICAL WILL:Only 40 percent of waterways surveyed were in a good ecological state, with England one of the worst offenders, the EEA said in a report

The Guardian

The vast majority of Europe’s rivers, lakes and estuaries have failed to meet minimum ecological standards for habitat degradation and pollution, according to a new report.

Only 40 percent of surface water bodies surveyed by the European Environmental Agency (EEA) were found to be in a good ecological state, despite EU laws and biodiversity protocols.

England was one of the poorer performers to emerge from the State of Our Waters report, which studied 130,000 waterways.

European Commissioner for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Karmenu Vella said there had been a slight improvement in freshwater quality since 2010.

“But much more needs to be done before all lakes, rivers, coastal waters and groundwater bodies are in good status,” he said. “Tackling pollution from agriculture, industry and households requires joint efforts from all water users throughout Europe.”

Scotland dramatically outperformed England in the clean water stocktake, which covers the 2010-to-2015 period, with water standards similar to much of Scandinavia.

Precise comparisons are difficult, as reporting methodologies vary across Europe, but water quality in England was in the bottom half of the European table, and had deteriorated since the last stocktake in 2010.

Peter Kristensen, the report’s lead author, told reporters that higher population densities, more intensive agricultural practices and better monitoring of waterways had all contributed to the result.

“England is comparable to countries in central Europe with a high proportion of water bodies failing to reach good status,” he said. “The situation is much better in Scotland, where only around 45 percent of sites failed [to meet minimum standards].”

“It would be advisable for England to continue with legislation similar to the water framework directive after Brexit,” he added.

The directive aims to protect protect human health, water supply, ecosystems and biodiversity, and was supposed to oblige EU countries to achieve a good ecological status for their waterways by 2015.

However, they have not, and their failure to do so threatens the bloc’s 2020 biodiversity goals, WWF Europe head of natural resources Andreas Baumueller said.

“This report shows that we are nowhere [near] halting biodiversity loss by 2020,” he said. “It is just another symptom that we will miss the targets set by heads of states. The legislation is there in the form of the EU’s Water Framework Directive, but the political will is clearly lacking to make it work on the ground.”

The EEA survey revealed a divide between chemical pollution in ground and surface water sites. Three-quarters of groundwater samples were of good quality; 62 percent of rivers, estuaries and lakes were not.

Mercury contamination was one of the most common problems, with overuse of pesticides, inadequate waste treatment plants and tainted rainfall all contributing to the results.

“We must increase efforts to ensure our waters are as clean and resilient as they should be — our own well-being and the health of our vital water and marine ecosystems depend on it,” EEA Executive Director Hans Bruyninckx said.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top