Sat, Jun 30, 2018 - Page 5 News List

Silent coup: Military’s shadow darkens media coverage of Pakistani elections


Pakistani journalists gather before a press conference outside the Supreme Court building in Islamabad on Thursday.

Photo: AFP

Facing abductions, censorship and financial ruin, journalists in Pakistan say they are under unprecedented pressure from authorities ahead of nationwide polls, sparking allegations the military is overseeing a “silent coup.”

Media houses describe a sustained campaign by the security establishment ahead of the July 25 election to curb their coverage.

Those who refuse to toe the line are increasingly targeted while their employers face financial blowback, sparking widespread self-censorship.

“We have never witnessed the censorship which we are facing today,” Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists president Afzal Butt said.

Pakistan is one of the most dangerous countries in the world for journalists and activists, and there have long been red lines, but the uptick in pressure is seen as brazen and extraordinary.

The nation’s largest broadcaster, Geo TV, was partially forced off air for weeks this year until it reportedly cut a deal with the military to adjust its coverage, according to local and international media.

Moreover, Dawn, the nation’s oldest newspaper, complains its sellers are being “threatened and coerced by state institutions” after an interview with former Pakistani prime minister Nawaz Sharif last month, where he suggested Pakistani militants were behind the 2008 Mumbai attacks that killed 166 people.

Such pressure on two of Pakistan’s most powerful media houses is a clear message, News correspondent Waseem Abbasi said.

“Other outlets have no chance. So basically they’re also falling in line,” he said.

Foreign envoys have also privately aired concerns, fearing for stability in the polarized country as polls approach.

“There is clearly a concerted effort to muzzle the media in Pakistan,” a diplomatic source requesting anonymity said. “This is deeply concerning.”

Much of the tension centers around the stand-off between Sharif and the powerful military, which has ruled Pakistan for about half its 70-year history.

Sharif, who at times appeared to seek a better relationship with arch-enemy India, was ousted by the Supreme Court last year following corruption charges and banned from politics for life.

He has since repeatedly accused the military of wanton political interference.

His quotes on the Mumbai attacks during an interview with Dawn journalist Cyril Almeida approached a widely acknowledged taboo in Pakistan: criticism of the armed forces’ alleged policy toward militant proxies in India and Afghanistan.

Journalists now face pressure to cease favorable coverage of Sharif and his Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), Abbasi said.

It is hard to quantify the extent of censorship and how it might hamper voters’ ability to make informed choices between the PML-N and other parties — namely the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, led by former cricketer Imran Khan.

The Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency, a think tank, said the electoral process appeared “unfair.”

Journalists believe they are “facing restraints at the hands of a silent coup in place by the military and its intelligence affiliate, the ISI,” it reported.

“Elections aren’t manipulated on the day in Pakistan,” said Omar Waraich, deputy South Asia director at Amnesty International. “The question is: Do you have a level playing field before, leading up to the elections?”

For news anchor Matiullah Jan the answer is simple.

This story has been viewed 3263 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top