Mon, Dec 25, 2017 - Page 5 News List

Judge partially lifts Trump travel ban on refugees

AP, SEATTLE

Urban Justice Center litigation director Mariko Hirose smiles as she leaves a federal courthouse after speaking with media members in Seattle on Thursday.

Photo: AP

A federal judge in Seattle on Saturday partially lifted a ban by the administration of US President Donald Trump on certain refugees, after two groups argued that the policy prevented people from some mostly Muslim countries from reuniting with family living legally in the US.

US District Judge James Robart on Thursday heard arguments in lawsuits from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Jewish Family Service, which said the ban causes irreparable harm and puts some people at risk.

US government lawyers argued that the ban is needed to protect national security.

Robart ordered the federal government to process certain refugee applications, but said his directive did not apply to people without a “bona fide relationship” to a person or entity in the US.

Trump restarted the refugee program in October “with enhanced vetting capabilities.”

The day before his executive order, US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, US Acting Homeland Security Secretary Elaine Duke and Director of US National Intelligence Daniel Coats sent a memo to Trump saying certain refugees must be banned unless additional security measures are implemented.

It applies to the spouses and minor children of refugees who have already settled in the US, and suspends the refugee program for people coming from 11 countries, nine of which are mostly Muslim.

In his decision, Robart wrote that “former officials detailed concretely how the agency memo will harm the United States’ national security and foreign policy interests.”

Robart said his order restores refugee procedures in programs to what they were before the memo and added that this already includes very thorough vetting of individuals.

The ACLU argued the memo provided no evidence for why additional security was needed and did not specify a time frame for implementing the changes.

The process for imposing the policy violated a federal law, the groups said.

US Department of Justice attorney August Flentje told the judge that the ban is temporary and “is a reasonable and appropriate way for agency heads to tackle gaps” in the screening process.

The lawsuits from the two groups were consolidated and represent refugees who have been blocked from entering the country.

The ACLU represents a Somalian man living in Washington state who is trying to bring his family to the US.

They have gone through extensive vetting, have passed security and medical clearances, and just need travel papers, but those were denied after the ban.

ACLU of Washington staff attorney Lisa Nowlin said in a statement that they were happy for their client — “who has not yet had the opportunity to celebrate a single birthday with his younger son in person — will soon have the opportunity to hold his children, hug his wife in the very near future, and be together again as a family for the first time in four years.”

Two other refugees included in the Jewish Family Service lawsuit are former Iraqi interpreters for the US Army whose lives are at risk because of their service.

Another is a transgender woman in Egypt “living in such extremely dangerous circumstances that the US government itself had expedited her case until the ban came down,” said Mariko Hirose, a lawyer with the Jewish Family Service case.

Yet another is a single woman in Iraq, Hirose said.

Her husband divorced her after she was kidnapped and raped by militants because she worked with a US company.

This story has been viewed 3128 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top