The Indian Supreme Court has upheld a decision to annul the marriage of a 24-year-old woman in Kerala and force her to live back at her parents’ house because she married a Muslim man.
The woman, Akhila Ashokan, who prefers to be known as Hadiya, converted to Islam from Hinduism while studying medicine in Coimbatore in Tamil Nadu.
Last year, she met Shafin Jahan, a Muslim, and they married in December. Her livid father went to the Kerala High Court demanding that Hadiya be returned to his custody.
In May, the court nullified the wedding and forcibly sent Hadiya back to her parental home in Kottayam despite her express wish not to return.
The controversial judgement said Hadiya was “weak and vulnerable, capable of being exploited in many ways” and that “her marriage being the most important decision in her life, can also be taken only with the active involvement of her parents.”
The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that India’s National Investigation Agency, which investigates terrorism, must assess whether Hadiya converted freely to Islam or was part of a “love jihad” — a phrase used by some Hindu fringe groups to allege that Muslim men are forcing Hindu women into marriage.
Hadiya has had virtually no contact with anyone outside her parents’ home since May.
Local reporters say she has no telephone or Internet access and the house is guarded by police officers.
A police officer quoted in the local media said social isolation had made Hadiya depressed.
Ashokan said the annulment of their marriage was “‘an insult to the independence of the women of India.”
Jahan approached the Supreme Court to rule on the validity of the ruling that annulled his marriage.
In his petition, he said the High Court order was an “insult to the independence of the women of India as it completely takes away their right to think for themselves.”
However, instead of overturning the lower court’s ruling, the Supreme Court ordered a federal investigation into the union.
In a video clip of Hadiya in her parents’ house, shot recently by a social activist, she is heard asking her mother: “Is this how I should live? Is this my life?”
The Supreme Court judgement has shocked women’s rights activists. The court has established a reputation for supporting Indian women by ruling against honor killings and other customs that deny women the right to exercise their choice.
Rebecca Mammen, a senior lawyer in India, said she was “simply stunned” by the Supreme Court ruling.
“It [the marriage] is clearly a consensual relationship between two adults, totally voluntary — the woman has not complained of any coercion — I don’t know of any law that allows a court to act in this way,” Mammen said. “So all I can say is that I am really taken aback.”
Vrinda Grover, a lawyer with a track record of defending women’s rights, called Hadiya’s confinement “illegal house arrest.”
Grover said it was typical, when an Indian woman transgressed social norms by exercising her own choice, that society should react by curbing her freedom.
“Her right, as an adult, to choose her husband irrespective of his caste or creed or ethnicity and her right to freedom of religion have been violated,” Grover said.
“The courts are behaving as though she doesn’t know what’s good for her. The fact of being kept confined by her parents has deprived her of her personal liberty,” Grover said.
The onset of summer has sparked a rise in incidents of “mask rage” in South Korea as more hot and bothered commuters either refuse to wear face coverings or leave parts of their faces exposed. In South Korea, Japan and other countries in East Asia, widespread mask wearing has been cited as one possible explanation for the region’s relative success in bringing the COVID-19 pandemic under control. South Korea, one of the first countries outside China to be affected by the virus, flattened the coronavirus curve in April, although it is now struggling with dozens of daily cases, mainly in and around
‘WOULD NOT COMPLY’: The company’s user data are kept in Singapore and it would not turn the data over to Beijing even if asked, TikTok chief executive Kevin Mayer said Social media app TikTok has distanced itself from Beijing after India banned 59 Chinese apps in the country, according to a correspondence seen by Reuters. In a letter to the Indian government dated on Sunday last week and seen by Reuters on Friday, TikTok chief executive Kevin Mayer said the Chinese government has never requested user data, nor would the company turn it over if asked. TikTok, which is not available in China, is owned by China’s ByteDance, but has sought to distance itself from its Chinese roots to appeal to a global audience. Along with 58 other Chinese apps, including Tencent
PLAYING THE VICTIM? A Chinese spokesman sent a statement to Australian media saying that Beijing had ‘irrefutable’ evidence of Canberra’s widescale espionage Australia yesterday unveiled the “largest-ever” boost in cybersecurity spending, days after Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison spoke out about a wave of state-sponsored attacks suspected to have been carried out by China. Morrison and government officials said the country would spend an additional A$1.35 billion (US$928 million) on cybersecurity, about a 10 percent hike, taking the budget for the next decade to A$15 billion. The largest chunk of the new money would help create 500 jobs within the Australian Signals Directorate, the government’s communications intelligence agency. Morrison on June 19 said that a “state-based actor” was targeting a host of
The Philippine army chief yesterday expressed outrage over the fatal police shooting of four soldiers, including two officers, and demanded justice, as both sides provided contrasting accounts of the killings. Philippine Secretary of the Interior and Local Government Eduardo Ano, a retired military chief of staff who now oversees the national police, ordered that the police involved in Monday’s violence in Jolo in Sulu Province be disarmed and restricted for investigation. Police said the soldiers were killed in a “misencounter” with a group of police officers. The army said that the two officers and two enlisted men were on a mission against