Planning documents detailing the refurbishment of a residential tower block in west London where at least 17 people died in a fire on Wednesday did not refer to a type of fire barrier that building safety experts said should be used when high rise blocks are being reclad.
The local authority which owns Grenfell Tower in Kensington declined to confirm whether fire barriers were installed on most floors between the insulation panels attached to the exterior of the building as part of the renovation.
Rydon Group, the construction company which undertook the work, also declined to say whether they had been used, but said the revamp “met all required building control, fire regulation, and health and safety standards.”
“We are shocked to hear of the devastating fire at Grenfell Tower and our immediate thoughts are with those that have been affected by the incident,” a Rydon Group spokesperson said in an e-mailed statement.
The government department in charge of regulating building work — the British Department for Communities and Local Government — did not respond to questions, including whether such fire barriers were required by law.
It later issued a statement saying “it would not be appropriate to comment on the cause of the fire.”
Legal experts declined to express an opinion on whether fire barriers are required by law.
A 2012 planning document published by the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, which included detailed diagrams of the planned new paneling and the materials used in the new skin, did not include reference to the barriers, according to a Reuters review.
The only new cladding elements depicted or listed in the “Sustainability and Energy Statement” were wall fixings, exterior zinc panels and polyisocyanurate insulation panels.
It is not clear if the document represented the final design used in the refurbishment of Grenfell Tower, a 24-story 1970s apartment block home to hundreds of residents, or whether fire barriers recommended by industry bodies were installed.
Save for a few of the lower floors, Grenfell Tower was engulfed in flames, trapping families in the upper stories.
Witnesses said the flames spread quickly up the building as most residents slept and photographs later on Wednesday showed an almost entirely blackened, smoldering shell.
The ￡8.7 million (US$11.08 million) refurbishment was completed last year. It involved the application of new external cladding and replacement windows, with the aim of improving heat and noise insulation, according to council documents.
The application of insulating layers to the outside of buildings is common, but it is also recognized by some architects and construction safety specialists as a potential fire risk.
That is because the area between the new exterior panel and the existing wall — which is usually filled with insulating material — becomes a potential channel for flames to rise up along the sides of the building, safety experts said.
The London Fire Brigade said it did not yet know the cause of the fire.
Documents published by the Building Research Establishment (BRE) in the UK and industry body the Insulated Render and Cladding Association recommend that fire-proof barriers be installed at each floor to make it harder for flames to travel up the gap in between the new and old skins.
“There is potential for the fire to propagate throughout the system if adequate fire barriers are not installed ... the installation of fire barriers at each floor level above the first floor level (i.e. starting with the second storey) should be considered,” the BRE said in a publication entitled Fire performance of external thermal insulation for walls of multistorey buildings.
Reuters was not able to determine how widely or how closely those guidelines were followed in similar renovations and it was not clear what impact the guidelines would have had in the case of Grenfell Tower.
WARNINGS OVER COMPLACENCY: The curves of new infections in numerous countries is climbing, while others see the the first new infections in months Spikes in COVID-19 infections in Asia have dispelled any notion that the region might be over the worst, with Australia and India yesterday reporting record daily infections, Vietnam fretting over a new surge and North Korea urging vigilance. Asian nations had largely prided themselves on rapidly containing initial outbreaks after the coronavirus emerged in central China late last year, but flare-ups this month have shown the danger of complacency. “We’ve got to be careful not to slip into some idea that there’s some golden immunity that Australia has in relation to this virus,” Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison told reporters. Australia recorded its
EVOLVING SITUATION: Of the latest cases, 23 percent were found to be asymptomatic, but the coronavirus strain in Da Nang is more contagious, authorities said A COVID-19 outbreak that began in the Vietnamese city of Da Nang more than a week ago has spread to at least four city factories with a combined workforce of about 3,700, state media reported yesterday. Four cases were found at the plants in different industrial parks in the central city that collectively employ 77,000 people, the Lao Dong newspaper said. Vietnam, praised widely for its decisive measures to combat the novel coronavirus since it first appeared in late January, is battling new clusters of infection having gone for more than three months without detecting any domestic transmissions. Authorities yesterday reported one new
‘COVIDIOTS’: Politicians condemned the protest that came amid surging infections in the country, while a marcher said government-induced fear weakened the body Loudly chanting their opposition to masks and vaccines, thousands of people on Saturday gathered in Berlin to protest against COVID-19 restrictions before being dispersed by police. Police put turnout at about 20,000 — well below the 500,000 organizers had announced as they urged a “day of freedom” from months of virus curbs. Despite Germany’s comparatively low toll, authorities are concerned at a rise in infections over the past few weeks and politicians took to social media to criticize the rally as irresponsible. “We are the second wave,” shouted the crowd, a mixture of hard left and right and conspiracy theorists, as they converged
The Australian government yesterday said that it plans to give Google and Facebook three months to negotiate with media businesses fair pay for news content. In releasing a draft of a mandatory code of conduct, Canberra aims to succeed where other nations have failed in making tech firms pay for news siphoned from commercial media companies. Australian Treasurer Josh Frydenberg said that Google and Facebook would be the first platforms targeted by the proposed legislation, but others could follow. “It’s about a fair go for Australian news media businesses, it’s about ensuring that we have increased competition, increased consumer protection and a sustainable