The WHO routinely spends about US$200 million a year on travel — far more than what it doles out to fight some of the biggest problems in public health, including AIDS, tuberculosis or malaria, according to internal documents obtained by The Associated Press.
As the cash-strapped UN health agency pleads for more money to fund its responses to health crises worldwide, it has also been struggling to get its own travel costs under control.
Despite introducing new rules to try to curb its expansive travel budget, senior officials have complained internally that UN staffers are breaking the rules by booking perks, such as business-class airplane tickets and rooms in five-star hotels.
Photo: AP
Last year, the WHO spent about US$71 million on AIDS and hepatitis, US$61 million on malaria and US$59 million to slow tuberculosis. Still, some health programs do get exceptional funding — the agency spends about US$450 million trying to wipe out polio every year.
On a recent trip to Guinea, where WHO Director-General Margaret Chan (陳馮富珍) praised health workers in west Africa for triumphing over Ebola, Chan stayed in the biggest presidential suite at the Palm Camayenne hotel in Conakry. The suite has an advertised price of 900 euros (US$1,008) a night.
The agency said that Chan’s overnight stay in Guinea cost the same as all other WHO travelers — 212 euros — but declined to say who picked up the tab, noting only that her hotels are sometimes paid for by the host country.
However, some say that sends the wrong message to the rest of the agency’s 7,000 staffers.
“We don’t trust people to do the right thing when it comes to travel,” WHO director of finance Nick Jeffreys said during an in-house seminar on accountability in September 2015 — a video of which was obtained by the AP.
Despite WHO’s numerous travel regulations, Jeffreys said staffers “can sometimes manipulate a little bit their travel.”
He said the agency could not be sure they were always booking the cheapest ticket or that the travel was even warranted.
“People don’t always know what the right thing to do is,” he said.
Ian Smith, executive director of Chan’s office, said that the chair of WHO’s audit committee said the agency often did little to stop misbehavior.
“We, as an organization, sometimes function as if rules are there to be broken and that exceptions are the rule rather than the norm,” Smith said.
Earlier that year, a memorandum was sent to Chan and other top leaders with the subject, “ACTIONS TO CONTAIN TRAVEL COSTS” in all-caps.
The memo reported that compliance with rules that travel be booked in advance was “very low” and said the WHO was under pressure from its member countries to save money.
Travel would always be necessary, but “as an organization we must demonstrate that we are serious about managing this appropriately,” the memo said.
In a statement to the AP, the UN health agency said “the nature of WHO’s work often requires WHO staff to travel” and said costs had been reduced 14 percent last year compared with the previous year — although that year’s total was exceptionally high due to the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa.
Nonetheless, staffers are still openly ignoring the rules.
An internal analysis in March, obtained by the AP, found that only two of seven departments at WHO’s Geneva headquarters met their targets and concluded the compliance rate for booking travel in advance was between 28 and 59 percent.
Since 2013, the WHO has paid out US$803 million for travel. The agency’s approximately US$2 billion annual budget is drawn from the taxpayer-funded contributions of its 194 member countries, with the US the largest contributor.
After he was elected, President Donald Trump tweeted : “The UN has such great potential,” but had become “just a club for people to get together, talk, and have a good time. So sad!”
Several health experts said while WHO’s travel costs look out of place when compared with some of its disease budgets, that does not necessarily mean that travel expenses are inflated.
Michael Osterholm, an infectious diseases expert at the University of Minnesota, has frequently been flown to WHO meetings — in economy — on the agency’s dime.
“This may just speak to how misplaced international priorities are, that WHO is getting so little for these disease programs,” he said.
During the Ebola disaster in West Africa, WHO’s travel costs spiked to US$234 million. Although experts say on-the-ground help was critical, some question whether the agency could n ot have shaved costs so that more funds went to west Africa , where the three stricken countries could not even afford basics like protective boots, gloves and soap for endangered medical workers or body bags for the thousands who died.
Bruce Aylward, who directed WHO’s outbreak response, racked up nearly US$400,000 in travel expenses during the Ebola crisis, sometimes flying by helicopter to visit clinics instead of traveling by jeep over muddy roads, according to internal trip reports he filed.
Chan spent more than US$370,000 in travel that year, as documented in a confidential 25-page analysis of WHO expenses that identified the agency’s top 50 spenders.
Aylward and Chan were first and second on that list.
Three sources who asked not to be identified for fear of losing their jobs told the AP that Chan often flew first class.
WHO said the travel policy, until February, “included the possibility for the [Chan] to fly first class.”
It said Chan flew business class and requested the policy be changed to eliminate the first-class option.
It also said that Chan “strictly abides” by WHO’s travel policies.
“There’s a huge inequality between the people at the top who are getting helicopters and business class and everyone else who just has to make do,” said Sophie Harman, an expert in global health politics at Queen Mary University in London.
Other international aid agencies, including Doctors Without Borders, explicitly forbid staff from traveling in business class. Even the charity’s president flies economy class, a spokeswoman said.
With a staff of about 37,000 aid workers versus WHO’s 7,000 staffers, Doctors Without Borders spends about US$43 million on travel a year.
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would not provide its travel costs, but said staffers are not allowed to fly business class unless they have a medical condition that warrants it.
UN children’s agency UNICEF, which has about 13,000 staffers, said it spent US$140 million on global travel last year.
“When you spend the kind of money WHO is spending on travel, you have to be able to justify it,” said Ashish Jha, director of the Global Health Institute at Harvard University. “I can’t think of any justification for ever flying first class.”
Jha said that the WHO’s travel spending could have significant consequences for fundraising.
Several weeks ago, the agency asked for about US$100 million to save people in Somalia from an ongoing drought.
In April, it requested US$126 million to stop the humanitarian catastrophe in Yemen .
“If WHO is not being as lean as possible, it’s going to be hard to remain credible when they make their next funding appeal,” Jha said.
Far from the violence ravaging Haiti, a market on the border with the Dominican Republic has maintained a welcome degree of normal everyday life. At the Dajabon border gate, a wave of Haitians press forward, eager to shop at the twice-weekly market about 200km from Haiti’s capital, Port-au-Prince. They are drawn by the market’s offerings — food, clothing, toys and even used appliances — items not always readily available in Haiti. However, with gang violence bad and growing ever worse in Haiti, the Dominican government has reinforced the usual military presence at the border and placed soldiers on alert. While the market continues to
An image of a dancer balancing on the words “China Before Communism” looms over Parisian commuters catching the morning metro, signaling the annual return of Shen Yun, a controversial spectacle of traditional Chinese dance mixed with vehement criticism of Beijing and conservative rhetoric. The Shen Yun Performing Arts company has slipped the beliefs of a spiritual movement called Falun Gong in between its technicolored visuals and leaping dancers since 2006, with advertising for the show so ubiquitous that it has become an Internet meme. Founded in 1992, Falun Gong claims nearly 100 million followers and has been subject to “persistent persecution” in
ONLINE VITRIOL: While Mo Yan faces a lawsuit, bottled water company Nongfu Spring and Tsinghua University are being attacked amid a rise in nationalist fervor At first glance, a Nobel prize winning author, a bottle of green tea and Beijing’s Tsinghua University have little in common, but in recent weeks they have been dubbed by China’s nationalist netizens as the “three new evils” in the fight to defend the country’s valor in cyberspace. Last month, a patriotic blogger called Wu Wanzheng filed a lawsuit against China’s only Nobel prize-winning author, Mo Yan (莫言), accusing him of discrediting the Communist army and glorifying Japanese soldiers in his fictional works set during the Japanese invasion of China. Wu, who posts online under the pseudonym “Truth-Telling Mao Xinghuo,” is seeking
‘SURPRISES’: The militants claim to have successfully tested a missile capable of reaching Mach 8 and vowed to strike ships heading toward the Cape of Good Hope Yemen’s Houthi rebels claim to have a new, hypersonic missile in their arsenal, Russia’s state media reported on Thursday, potentially raising the stakes in their attacks on shipping in the Red Sea and surrounding waterways against the backdrop of Israel’s war with Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The report by the state-run RIA Novosti news agency cited an unidentified official, but provided no evidence for the claim. It comes as Moscow maintains an aggressively counter-Western foreign policy amid its grinding war on Ukraine. However, the Houthis have for weeks hinted about “surprises” they plan for the battles at sea to counter the