Britain’s vote to become the first country to leave the EU is a shattering blow that threatens the survival of the post-war European project, officials and analysts said.
The loss of one of its biggest members would at the very least force major changes on an embattled bloc already struggling to deal with growing populism, a migration crisis and economic woes, they said.
In the long-run, “Brexit” might lead to other countries holding referendums, a far looser union and possibly even the disintegration of a grouping set up 60 years ago to bring security and prosperity after World War II.
EU President Donald Tusk warned in the run-up to the vote that Brexit could lead to the “destruction of not only the EU, but also of Western political civilization.”
With Europe facing a resurgent Russia and the threat of terrorism, Tusk said “our enemies ... will open a bottle of champagne if the result of referendum is negative for us.”
In a less doom-laden assessment, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker last week said that the EU was not “in danger of death” from a Brexit, but that it would have to learn lessons.
Chris Bickerton, a lecturer at Britain’s Cambridge University and author of The European Union: A Citizen’s Guide, said it was a “very serious blow,” but not terminal, given the “core role” of the EU in much of European political life.
However, he added that it would probably drift toward a “looser, ad hoc” union.
“I don’t think it would suddenly disappear, but over the longer term, we might see it slowly decline and become something different,” Bickerton said.
The next steps for the EU would be difficult, he added.
“We are very much in uncharted territory,” Bickerton said. “I don’t think anyone really thought Brexit was really likely, certainly not when they were negotiating with Cameron, otherwise they would have done a very different deal.”
In the immediate aftermath of the British vote, seven years of potentially bitter divorce negotiations between Brussels and London loom.
The remaining EU countries are likely be keen to move ahead. EU heavyweights France and Germany have already been working on a joint plan for the future. However, with Berlin and Paris at loggerheads over future integration of the eurozone, any plan is likely to be a modest affair that deals only with issues such as security and defense.
Even without Britain in the club, the drift away from “ever closer union” and federalism is likely to increase, with growing talk of a “two-speed Europe” that allows states opt-outs from key rules.
One major step could be making membership of the euro non-compulsory, which would help Poland, which appears to have no intention of joining the single currency, but is officially meant to.
Brussels-based French Institute of International Relations analyst Vivien Pertusot said the EU was likely to survive, but be weakened.
“Institutions rarely die,” he said. “Maybe there will not be disintegration, but a loss of relevance. The EU will lose, bit by bit, its centrality for all the most political projects,” Pertusot said.
The danger for the EU is that even after if makes changes following the British referendum, it might still be unable to quell the forces of history tearing it apart.
“The EU is in a negative spiral,” said Janis Emmanouilidis, director of studies at Brussels-based think tank the European Policy Centre.
The question of what could replace the EU if it does collapse is even more vexed.
“It might sound as if yes, this story has ended, a new one has began, but that’s not easy. Especially after the experience of failure,” Emmanouilidis said.
Nearly half of China’s major cities are suffering “moderate to severe” levels of subsidence, putting millions of people at risk of flooding, especially as sea levels rise, according to a study of nationwide satellite data released yesterday. The authors of the paper, published by the journal Science, found that 45 percent of China’s urban land was sinking faster than 3mm per year, with 16 percent at more than 10mm per year, driven not only by declining water tables, but also the sheer weight of the built environment. With China’s urban population already in excess of 900 million people, “even a small portion
UNSETTLING IMAGES: The scene took place in front of TV crews covering the Trump trial, with a CNN anchor calling it an ‘emotional and unbelievably disturbing moment’ A man who doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire outside the courthouse where former US president Donald Trump is on trial has died, police said yesterday. The New York City Police Department (NYPD) said the man was declared dead by staff at an area hospital. The man was in Collect Pond Park at about 1:30pm on Friday when he took out pamphlets espousing conspiracy theories, tossed them around, then doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire, officials and witnesses said. A large number of police officers were nearby when it happened. Some officers and bystanders rushed
HYPOCRISY? The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday asked whether Biden was talking about China or the US when he used the word ‘xenophobic’ US President Joe Biden on Wednesday called for a hike in steel tariffs on China, accusing Beijing of cheating as he spoke at a campaign event in Pennsylvania. Biden accused China of xenophobia, too, in a speech to union members in Pittsburgh. “They’re not competing, they’re cheating. They’re cheating and we’ve seen the damage here in America,” Biden said. Chinese steel companies “don’t need to worry about making a profit because the Chinese government is subsidizing them so heavily,” he said. Biden said he had called for the US Trade Representative to triple the tariff rates for Chinese steel and aluminum if Beijing was
Beijing is continuing to commit genocide and crimes against humanity against Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities in its western Xinjiang province, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a report published on Monday, ahead of his planned visit to China this week. The State Department’s annual human rights report, which documents abuses recorded all over the world during the previous calendar year, repeated language from previous years on the treatment of Muslims in Xinjiang, but the publication raises the issue ahead of delicate talks, including on the war in Ukraine and global trade, between the top U.S. diplomat and Chinese