A cross-party parliamentary committee on Friday condemned the “arms race of ever more lurid claims” on both sides of Britain’s EU referendum debate, saying it was confusing the public.
Lawmakers on the British Treasury committee highlighted the “highly misleading” claim by the “Vote Leave” campaign that Britain could save ￡350 million (US$511.77 million) per week by leaving the bloc.
They also criticized the “Remain” camp for suggesting that 3 million jobs depended on continued membership of the EU, and that households could be up to ￡4,300 per year worse off in the event of a so-called Brexit.
“The arms race of ever more lurid claims and counter-claims made by both the leave and remain sides is not just confusing the public. It is impoverishing political debate,” said committee chairman Andrew Tyrie, of the Conservative Party.
In a statement, he conceded that “a few grains of truth accompany the mountain of exaggeration,” notably that there would be a “short-term economic cost” to a vote to leave the EU in the referendum on June 23.
In the longer-term, trade with the EU would likely fall, the committee found, but there were potential benefits in improving Britain’s regulatory framework and in striking new and better trade deals.
“Vote Leave,” the campaign supported by former London mayor Boris Johnson, has made the ￡350 million claim a central part of its bid to woo voters, splashing it across the side of its campaign bus.
It implies the money — Britain’s weekly gross contribution to the EU budget — could be spent instead on hospitals and schools.
However, it does not include the rebate worth ￡85 million per week, and the MPs said that even after a Brexit, the government might continue to contribute some money to the EU budget in return for access to the single market.
The committee also queried the “misleading” claim that the top 100 most “burdensome” EU regulations cost ￡600 million per week.
On the “Remain” side, the MPs said the 3 million jobs associated with EU trade should not be presented as at risk from a Brexit.
They also criticized the “tendentious” claim that a Brexit could increase the cost of imports by at least ￡11 billion.
FOX HUNT: To suppress dissent, Chinese living abroad that Xi Jinping sees as threats are told to either return to China or commit suicide, Christopher Wray said Chinese agents have been pursuing hundreds of Chinese nationals living in the US in an effort to force their return, as part of a global campaign against the country’s diaspora, known as Operation Fox Hunt, FBI Director Christopher Wray said on Tuesday. In a speech about the security threat posed by China, during which he said Beijing’s counterintelligence work was the “greatest long-term threat to our nation’s information and intellectual property, and to our economic vitality,” Wray gave the example of one Fox Hunt target who was given a choice of going back to China or killing themselves. Fox Hunt was launched
‘WOULD NOT COMPLY’: The company’s user data are kept in Singapore and it would not turn the data over to Beijing even if asked, TikTok chief executive Kevin Mayer said Social media app TikTok has distanced itself from Beijing after India banned 59 Chinese apps in the country, according to a correspondence seen by Reuters. In a letter to the Indian government dated on Sunday last week and seen by Reuters on Friday, TikTok chief executive Kevin Mayer said the Chinese government has never requested user data, nor would the company turn it over if asked. TikTok, which is not available in China, is owned by China’s ByteDance, but has sought to distance itself from its Chinese roots to appeal to a global audience. Along with 58 other Chinese apps, including Tencent
INTERNET CURBS: People are rushing to erase their digital footprints after police given powers over online activity, although it might take years for the full effect to be felt At midnight on Tuesday, the Great Firewall of China, the vast apparatus that limits the country’s Internet, appeared to descend on Hong Kong. Unveiling expanded police powers as part of contentious new national security legislation, the Hong Kong government enabled police to censor online speech, and force Internet service providers to hand over user information and shut down platforms. Many residents, already anxious since the legislation took effect last week, rushed to erase their digital footprint of any signs of dissent or support for the past year of protests. Hong Kong Legislator Charles Mok (莫乃光), a pro-democracy member of the Legislative
‘FIGHT FOR FREEDOM’: Hong Kongers will never bow to Beijing, the advocate said, while the US’ envoy to the territory called China’s new security law a ‘tragedy’ The world must stand in solidarity with Hong Kongers after Beijing imposed sweeping national security legislation on the semi-autonomous territory, advocate Joshua Wong (黃之鋒) said yesterday, vowing to continue campaigning for democracy. Wong, one of the territory’s most prominent young advocates and a figure loathed by Beijing, was speaking outside a court where he and fellow advocates are being prosecuted for involvement in last year’s pro-democracy protests. China last week enacted sweeping security legislation for the restless territory, banning acts of subversion, secession, terrorism and collusion with foreign forces. The legislation has sent a wave of fear through the territory, and criminalized dissenting