In one case, a writer claimed a mini Ice Age would befall the Earth in 15 years. In another, an op-ed touted global warming as saving countless people from freezing to death.
A new project called Climate Feedback, run by a French scientist living in California, took these and other stories to task, and in the past year has critiqued climate change stories in the New York Times, Rolling Stone, the Telegraph, Forbes magazine, the Wall Street Journal and more.
Interested readers can visit the Web site ClimateFeedback.org to see what climate scientists thought of the original article.
The site uses Internet annotation software to enable line-by-line critiques from more than 100 volunteer scientists, identifying what they see as errors, falsehoods and misrepresentations.
Founder Emmanuel Vincent, 31, said the project is about communication, not activism.
NEUTRAL EXPLANATIONS
“We see it as a scientific endeavor,” said Vincent, who is from the French village of Lignan sur Orb — near Montpellier — and works as a project scientist at the University of California, Merced.
“We try to be neutral and explain the science and why some people get it wrong in the media,” Vincent said.
Vincent said the Web site is aimed at the general public, but particularly journalists, editors, and those who influence public opinion.
He is currently raising money to do even more by launching a “Scientific Trust Tracker” that would grade various media on reliability when it comes to climate change stories.
The US space agency NASA, on its Twitter handle NASA Climate, called the project “a win for science and a win for climate reporting.”
In some cases, the critiques have resulted in corrections, including the Telegraph article that claimed a mini Ice Age was imminent.
However, others have not, such as a pair of Forbes articles — one that featured a listicle of alleged global warming “lies” and another that claimed NASA denied any retreat of polar ice.
They garnered hundreds of thousands of views online, but were never corrected, despite being described as “deeply inaccurate and misleading by the more than 20 scientists who reviewed them,” according to ClimateFeedback.org.
Another popular target is Bjorn Lomborg — the Danish author of the 2001 best-seller — The Skeptical Environmentalist, who frequently writes about the politics and economics of climate change.
Lomborg’s opinion articles have been graded “very low” in terms of scientific credibility, and Climate Feedback scientists accuse him of “cherry-picking” data to back up his arguments, mainly that global warming has some benefits — including the bit about saving people who might have frozen — and that climate alarmism does not lead to effective solutions.
NOT A FAN
In an interview with reporters, Lomborg said he was “quite shocked” by the site’s critiques, and disagreed with their tactics.
“They are having people pretend to talk science, but they are really talking politics,” he said. “Because they are saying unless you say something that shows global warming is bad, you are wrong.”
Lomborg said he believes he is writing for a sophisticated audience that understands — as he does — that climate change is happening and is dangerous.
“The current way we are tackling it is incredibly ineffective,” he said. “Making it about only the negatives — if you are only allowed to talk about that — actually makes this a very, very poor way to be informed.”
So what is the best way to communicate about climate change?
Denial and skepticism about climate change remain a problem in the US, where a recent Gallup poll found that one in three people do not blame human activity for global warming and 57 percent do not see climate change as a serious threat.
Some say the media is to blame for these beliefs.
Meteorologist Eric Holthaus wanted to find a way to cut through the scientific jargon for readers of Rolling Stone in a piece titled “Point of No Return: Climate Change Nightmares are Already Here.”
During the editing process, a climate scientist Holthaus respected said he liked the piece, but feared Holthaus might have been too straightforward, too direct, too certain in assertions.
So Holthaus volunteered to have his story put under the microscope by Climate Feedback scientists.
Their review was mixed.
They found no errors, but some commented on research he had failed to mention, or found fault with the lack of links to original science articles.
LEARNING OPPORTUNITY?
“Maybe the scientists were reading it as if they were reading a formal journal article, and not necessarily a piece that is written to the same audience that reads music reviews,” Holthaus told reporters.
He described the process as a “learning opportunity” that nevertheless raised many questions.
“If they are trying to fact check all of climate journalism, that seems to be a big task and then even you have to ask the question, what is the point of that,” he said.
He also said relying on readers to go to ClimateFeedback.org to check an article that they might have read elsewhere, and expecting it would change their views “seems a little bit idealistic.”
Republican US lawmakers on Friday criticized US President Joe Biden’s administration after sanctioned Chinese telecoms equipment giant Huawei unveiled a laptop this week powered by an Intel artificial intelligence (AI) chip. The US placed Huawei on a trade restriction list in 2019 for contravening Iran sanctions, part of a broader effort to hobble Beijing’s technological advances. Placement on the list means the company’s suppliers have to seek a special, difficult-to-obtain license before shipping to it. One such license, issued by then-US president Donald Trump’s administration, has allowed Intel to ship central processors to Huawei for use in laptops since 2020. China hardliners
Conjoined twins Lori and George Schappell, who pursued separate careers, interests and relationships during lives that defied medical expectations, died this month in Pennsylvania, funeral home officials said. They were 62. The twins, listed by Guinness World Records as the oldest living conjoined twins, died on April 7 at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, obituaries posted by Leibensperger Funeral Homes of Hamburg said. The cause of death was not detailed. “When we were born, the doctors didn’t think we’d make 30, but we proved them wrong,” Lori said in an interview when they turned 50, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported. The
RAMPAGE: A Palestinian man was left dead after dozens of Israeli settlers searching for a missing 14-year-old boy stormed a village in the Israeli-occupied West Bank US President Joe Biden on Friday said he expected Iran to attack Israel “sooner, rather than later” and warned Tehran not to proceed. Asked by reporters about his message to Iran, Biden simply said: “Don’t,” underscoring Washington’s commitment to defend Israel. “We are devoted to the defense of Israel. We will support Israel. We will help defend Israel and Iran will not succeed,” he said. Biden said he would not divulge secure information, but said his expectation was that an attack could come “sooner, rather than later.” Israel braced on Friday for an attack by Iran or its proxies as warnings grew of
IN PURSUIT: Israel’s defense minister said the revenge attacks by Israeli settlers would make it difficult for security forces to find those responsible for the 14-year-old’s death Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Saturday condemned the “heinous murder” of an Israeli teenager in the occupied West Bank as attacks on Palestinian villages intensified following news of his death. After Benjamin Achimeir, 14, was reported missing near Ramallah on Friday, hundreds of Jewish settlers backed by Israeli forces raided nearby Palestinian villages, torching vehicles and homes, leaving at least one villager dead and dozens wounded. The attacks escalated in several villages on Saturday after Achimeir’s body was found near the Malachi Hashalom outpost. Agence France-Presse correspondents saw smoke rising from burned houses and fields. Mayor Amin Abu Alyah, of the