Republican US presidential hopeful Donald Trump’s claim that Arab Americans cheered during the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks is just the latest in a string of claims from across party lines that fact checkers dispute.
Carly Fiorina said the US was preparing to accept 250,000 Syrian refugees; former US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton said that her handling of e-mails through a private server was “permitted” by the US Department of State; US Senator Marco Rubio said that welders earn more than philosophers; US Senator Bernie Sanders said “climate change is directly related to the growth of terrorism”; and Ben Carson said that no signatories of the Declaration of Independence had elected office experience.
Such claims, which fact checkers have said are not true, are part of political life.
The Republican campaign for next year’s election has been notable for incendiary claims, most notably by Trump.
“There is no rigorous way to quantify deception being better or worse over time, but I do think it’s fair to say Donald Trump is on the verge of melting down the fact-checking sites with what he is saying,” said Brendan Nyhan, a Dartmouth College political scientist who follows fact-checking and campaigns.
Trump earlier this year said the US unemployment rate was as high as 42 percent.
More recently, he tweeted a graphic showing that 81 percent of white people killed in homicides were killed by black people.
The Web site PolitiFact said the correct figure from US Department of Justice statistics was 15 percent.
Asked by Fox News about the mistake, Trump said: “I didn’t tweet, I retweeted somebody that was supposedly an expert... Am I going to check every statistic?”
The New York Times on Tuesday said in an editorial that the past week of the campaign had been “dominated by Donald Trump’s racist lies.”
Politicians in many cases have stood by their claims — including Trump arguing that he saw thousands cheering the 2001 attacks.
Trump even fired back at the Washington Post, which disputed his claims about the attacks, tweeting: “I want an apology! Many people have tweeted that I am right!”
“There have definitely been times when I scratch my head wondering how could they say something when it is so obviously false and then not acknowledge that it is false, but I’m not a psychologist and don’t try to figure out why people say these things,” said Bill Adair, a founder and contributing editor of PolitiFact and a journalism professor at Duke University.
Republican candidate Jeb Bush claimed for example that “Florida led the nation in job creation” while he was governor — a statement given a “four Pinocchios” rating as false by the Washington Post’s fact-checker.
US Senator Ted Cruz maintained that Hispanic unemployment and teen unemployment has gone up under US President Barack Obama, while FactCheck.org found statistics showing the contrary.
Carson — who repeated Trump’s claim about people cheering on Sept. 11, 2001 — also said that US border patrols released many people attempting to enter the nation who were from Iraq, and Somalia and Russia.
FactCheck said that people arriving from those countries were less than 1 percent of the total.
Boston College political scientist Emily Thorson said that “misinformation” can often have lingering effects even if a falsehood is quickly corrected.
For example, if people are told a restaurant has an infestation, they might feel squeamish about the place even if they learn it was a mistake, she said.
“It’s hard to undo the initial effects,” she told reporters. “Misinformation gets out there and gets repeated.”
Thorson’s research on the topic showed that when people hear negative things about a candidate that turn out to be false, a correction only “mutes” the impact.
Researchers also say that backers of candidates are rarely swayed by fact-checkers.
“There is a group of people who won’t believe a correction if you have a subject that ties into their partisan identities,” Thorson said.
Nyhan said that fact-checking “can often be ineffective or counterproductive when it comes to the most controversial political issues.”
When confronted with facts about such hot issues, “people tend to resist information that runs counter to their pre-existing beliefs and attitudes,” he said.
Nonetheless, Nyhan said it would be wrong to diminish the value of fact-checking political candidates.
“The threat of fact-checking can help constrain politicians from making misleading statements,” he said. “And so it’s reasonable to assume that if we didn’t have fact checking, things would be worse.”
SEEKING CHANGE: A hospital worker said she did not vote in previous elections, but ‘now I can see that maybe my vote can change the system and the country’ Voting closed yesterday across the Solomon Islands in the south Pacific nation’s first general election since the government switched diplomatic allegiance from Taiwan to Beijing and struck a secret security pact that has raised fears of the Chinese navy gaining a foothold in the region. The Solomon Islands’ closer relationship with China and a troubled domestic economy weighed on voters’ minds as they cast their ballots. As many as 420,000 registered voters had their say across 50 national seats. For the first time, the national vote also coincided with elections for eight of the 10 local governments. Esther Maeluma cast her vote in the
Nearly half of China’s major cities are suffering “moderate to severe” levels of subsidence, putting millions of people at risk of flooding, especially as sea levels rise, according to a study of nationwide satellite data released yesterday. The authors of the paper, published by the journal Science, found that 45 percent of China’s urban land was sinking faster than 3mm per year, with 16 percent at more than 10mm per year, driven not only by declining water tables, but also the sheer weight of the built environment. With China’s urban population already in excess of 900 million people, “even a small portion
UNSETTLING IMAGES: The scene took place in front of TV crews covering the Trump trial, with a CNN anchor calling it an ‘emotional and unbelievably disturbing moment’ A man who doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire outside the courthouse where former US president Donald Trump is on trial has died, police said yesterday. The New York City Police Department (NYPD) said the man was declared dead by staff at an area hospital. The man was in Collect Pond Park at about 1:30pm on Friday when he took out pamphlets espousing conspiracy theories, tossed them around, then doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire, officials and witnesses said. A large number of police officers were nearby when it happened. Some officers and bystanders rushed
HYPOCRISY? The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday asked whether Biden was talking about China or the US when he used the word ‘xenophobic’ US President Joe Biden on Wednesday called for a hike in steel tariffs on China, accusing Beijing of cheating as he spoke at a campaign event in Pennsylvania. Biden accused China of xenophobia, too, in a speech to union members in Pittsburgh. “They’re not competing, they’re cheating. They’re cheating and we’ve seen the damage here in America,” Biden said. Chinese steel companies “don’t need to worry about making a profit because the Chinese government is subsidizing them so heavily,” he said. Biden said he had called for the US Trade Representative to triple the tariff rates for Chinese steel and aluminum if Beijing was