Amid fears of an atomic arms race in the Middle East, a senior United Arab Emirates (UAE) official has told a top US lawmaker that it too might seek the right to enrich uranium that Iran has asserted under the recently signed nuclear deal.
The landmark Iran accord to curb its nuclear weapons in exchange for economic sanctions relief allows Tehran to enrich uranium. In barely noticed testimony last month, US House of Representatives’ Committee on Foreign Affairs Chairman Ed Royce said that UAE Ambassador to the US Yousef al-Otaiba had informed him in a telephone call that the country no longer felt bound by its previous nuclear agreement with the US.
“He told me: ‘Your worst enemy has achieved this right to enrich. It’s a right to enrich now that your friends are going to want, too, and we won’t be the only country,’” Royce said in a phone interview with reporters this week, elaborating on his testimony.
In a 2009 pact with the UAE, the US agreed to share materials, technology and equipment for producing nuclear energy. In the accord — known as a 123 Agreement — the UAE made a bold pledge not to enrich uranium or reprocess spent fuel to extract plutonium, two pathways to an atomic weapon.
Asked to respond, the UAE embassy in Washington sent a one-sentence e-mail that said: The “government has not formally changed its views or perspective on the 123 Agreement or commitments.”
The UAE has said in the past that it welcomes the nuclear deal reached with Iran.
NON-BINDING
However, Royce said al-Otaiba told him that the UAE “no longer felt bound” by those provisions of the agreement.
While al-Otaiba did not explicitly state that his country was walking away from them, Royce said: “I took that to mean that they had the right to do that and that it was under consideration.”
The UAE Department of State declined requests for comment.
Royce and other opponents of the Iran nuclear deal have repeatedly warned that the accord is likely to unleash a cascade of proliferation in the unstable Middle East or set off an arms race in a hotbed for terrorists. Proponents say it could make the region safer by preventing Tehran from having the means to produce bomb material for more than a decade or longer.
At a House subcommittee hearing on Sept. 10, US Representative Michael Turner quizzed National Nuclear Security Administration Administrator Frank Klotz about whether the UAE had contacted the US about wanting to forgo the part of the 123 Agreement that restricts it from enriching uranium.
Klotz said he had no knowledge of it.
A week earlier, US House Committee on Armed Services Chairman Mac Thornberry and US House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes pressed US President Barack Obama’s administration for details on whether any nation had asked to renegotiate or alter obligations in 123 Agreements signed with the US after the Iran deal.
In a Sept. 3 letter to US Secretary of State John Kerry, US Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz and US Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, the two Republican lawmakers wrote: “The committees require the administration to provide details regarding whether any state party to a 123 Agreement with the United States has notified the administration that it intends to renegotiate or otherwise alter its obligations under such an agreement due to the Iran nuclear deal.”
“Similarly, the committees require the administration to provide any other information it may have concerning the intentions of allies with respect to their civil nuclear capabilities,” the letter said.
The US has signed similar 123 Agreements with about 20 countries. The name comes from Section 123 of the US Atomic Energy Act, which requires such accords when the US is transferring significant amounts of nuclear material, equipment or components to other nations for peaceful energy production. The goal is to prevent further proliferation of material that also can be used to build nuclear weapons.
‘GOLD STANDARD’
The UAE’s pledge not to enrich has been dubbed the “gold standard” in 123 Agreements. Other nations have resisted making legal commitments that would forever prevent them from being able to enrich.
“The UAE, which has a strong commitment to nonproliferation and global nuclear disarmament, is a notable exception,” said Daryl Kimball, executive director of the independent Arms Control Association, which supported the Iran deal.
“If the UAE were to seek to back out of its commitment not to pursue enrichment and reprocessing, it would be symbolic setback to the longstanding goal of preventing the spread of enrichment and reprocessing technologies — which can be used for civilian or military purposes,” he said.
However, even if the UAE backed away from its pledge not to enrich, Kimball said it does not mean it has aspirations of building a nuclear weapon.
The issue still rankles US Senator Bob Menendez, who opposed the Iran nuclear deal.
In a lengthy speech to announce his opposition in August, Menendez said: “Imagine how a country like the United Arab Emirates — sitting just miles away from Iran across the Strait of Hormuz — feels after they sign a civilian nuclear agreement with the US ... to not enrich or reprocess uranium?”
Republican US lawmakers on Friday criticized US President Joe Biden’s administration after sanctioned Chinese telecoms equipment giant Huawei unveiled a laptop this week powered by an Intel artificial intelligence (AI) chip. The US placed Huawei on a trade restriction list in 2019 for contravening Iran sanctions, part of a broader effort to hobble Beijing’s technological advances. Placement on the list means the company’s suppliers have to seek a special, difficult-to-obtain license before shipping to it. One such license, issued by then-US president Donald Trump’s administration, has allowed Intel to ship central processors to Huawei for use in laptops since 2020. China hardliners
A top Vietnamese property tycoon was on Thursday sentenced to death in one of the biggest corruption cases in history, with an estimated US$27 billion in damages. A panel of three hand-picked jurors and two judges rejected all defense arguments by Truong My Lan, chair of major developer Van Thinh Phat, who was found guilty of swindling cash from Saigon Commercial Bank (SCB) over a decade. “The defendant’s actions ... eroded people’s trust in the leadership of the [Communist] Party and state,” read the verdict at the trial in Ho Chi Minh City. After the five-week trial, 85 others were also sentenced on
Conjoined twins Lori and George Schappell, who pursued separate careers, interests and relationships during lives that defied medical expectations, died this month in Pennsylvania, funeral home officials said. They were 62. The twins, listed by Guinness World Records as the oldest living conjoined twins, died on April 7 at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, obituaries posted by Leibensperger Funeral Homes of Hamburg said. The cause of death was not detailed. “When we were born, the doctors didn’t think we’d make 30, but we proved them wrong,” Lori said in an interview when they turned 50, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported. The
RAMPAGE: A Palestinian man was left dead after dozens of Israeli settlers searching for a missing 14-year-old boy stormed a village in the Israeli-occupied West Bank US President Joe Biden on Friday said he expected Iran to attack Israel “sooner, rather than later” and warned Tehran not to proceed. Asked by reporters about his message to Iran, Biden simply said: “Don’t,” underscoring Washington’s commitment to defend Israel. “We are devoted to the defense of Israel. We will support Israel. We will help defend Israel and Iran will not succeed,” he said. Biden said he would not divulge secure information, but said his expectation was that an attack could come “sooner, rather than later.” Israel braced on Friday for an attack by Iran or its proxies as warnings grew of