The British public has endured the expenses scandal, a Cabinet minister describing police officers as “plebs” and a Labour MP sending an allegedly snobby tweet about “white van men.” However, for sheer chutzpah, the peers of the realm have potentially topped them all.
It has emerged that a plan to save UK taxpayers some money by making peers and MPs share a catering department has been rejected, “because the Lords feared that the quality of champagne would not be as good if they chose a joint service.”
The disclosure, made recently by Sir William McKay, clerk of the House of Commons between 1998 and 2002, as he gave evidence to a governance committee examining how Westminster should be run, was met with gasps and open laughter.
The committee chair, former home secretary Jack Straw, asked: “Did you make that up? Is that true?”
“Yes, it is true,” McKay said.
Were the Lords right to be so sniffy, Democratic Unionist MP Ian Paisley asked.
“I don’t think they were; we were very careful in our selection,” said McKay, who had responsibility for catering procurement in the Commons.
Evidence given the following day by recently retired clerk of the house Sir Robert Rogers served only to confirm the peers’ continued protectiveness over their choice of bubbly.
When he was asked why there was not a joint catering service, Rogers said: “It would be very difficult to get a joint catering service. I must be very careful — for a number of reasons — what I say here.”
Paisley said: “The champagne?” while Straw added: “We heard a few things yesterday.”
“No, I am not going into the quality of the champagne. People are very possessive about some services. Catering is an absolute classic,” Rogers said.
The House of Lords — which has a £1.3 million (US$2 million) annual catering budget — has bought more than 17,000 bottles of champagne since the coalition took office, enough to give each peer just over five bottles each year, at a cost of £265,770.
As of March 31, the House of Lords, which has 780 peers, had 380 bottles of champagne in stock — worth £5,713 — in its main cellar and at individual stores on site.
A former leader of the Commons, Peter Hain, said the revelation made the case more compelling for reform of the way the Palace of Westminster was run.
The governance committee is taking evidence as part of a consultation over whether the Palace of Westminster should be run by a clerk who also has duties to advise on constitutional and legislative matters, or should be split up, with a corporate-style chief executive taking over responsibility for the £200 million-a-year budget.
Yet its work is in danger of spilling a series of uncomfortable secrets about the way the parliamentary estate, where 1,800 people work, has been managed.
The committee taking evidence from MPs, peers and former clerks of the Commons has heard tales of mice running through the MPs’ tearooms, perennially overflowing urinals, a visitors’ center with a permanently leaking roof, and an account of how even the clerk of the Commons’ jaw dropped when he first heard what MPs had been able to claim on expenses.
The question of future governance has pitched three key reformers against three former clerks.
The clerks told the committee: “The history of the administrative modernization has, in our view, resulted in a house service fit for purpose, with one point of accountability in the office of the clerk and chief executive.”
The three senior MPs told the committee in a submission: “We fundamentally disagree... From the presence of mice all over the house, including in the members’ dining room and other venues where food is consumed, to long visitor queues and bungled pay negotiations, we do not consider the house service is at all ‘fit for purpose.’”
Republican US lawmakers on Friday criticized US President Joe Biden’s administration after sanctioned Chinese telecoms equipment giant Huawei unveiled a laptop this week powered by an Intel artificial intelligence (AI) chip. The US placed Huawei on a trade restriction list in 2019 for contravening Iran sanctions, part of a broader effort to hobble Beijing’s technological advances. Placement on the list means the company’s suppliers have to seek a special, difficult-to-obtain license before shipping to it. One such license, issued by then-US president Donald Trump’s administration, has allowed Intel to ship central processors to Huawei for use in laptops since 2020. China hardliners
A top Vietnamese property tycoon was on Thursday sentenced to death in one of the biggest corruption cases in history, with an estimated US$27 billion in damages. A panel of three hand-picked jurors and two judges rejected all defense arguments by Truong My Lan, chair of major developer Van Thinh Phat, who was found guilty of swindling cash from Saigon Commercial Bank (SCB) over a decade. “The defendant’s actions ... eroded people’s trust in the leadership of the [Communist] Party and state,” read the verdict at the trial in Ho Chi Minh City. After the five-week trial, 85 others were also sentenced on
Conjoined twins Lori and George Schappell, who pursued separate careers, interests and relationships during lives that defied medical expectations, died this month in Pennsylvania, funeral home officials said. They were 62. The twins, listed by Guinness World Records as the oldest living conjoined twins, died on April 7 at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, obituaries posted by Leibensperger Funeral Homes of Hamburg said. The cause of death was not detailed. “When we were born, the doctors didn’t think we’d make 30, but we proved them wrong,” Lori said in an interview when they turned 50, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported. The
RAMPAGE: A Palestinian man was left dead after dozens of Israeli settlers searching for a missing 14-year-old boy stormed a village in the Israeli-occupied West Bank US President Joe Biden on Friday said he expected Iran to attack Israel “sooner, rather than later” and warned Tehran not to proceed. Asked by reporters about his message to Iran, Biden simply said: “Don’t,” underscoring Washington’s commitment to defend Israel. “We are devoted to the defense of Israel. We will support Israel. We will help defend Israel and Iran will not succeed,” he said. Biden said he would not divulge secure information, but said his expectation was that an attack could come “sooner, rather than later.” Israel braced on Friday for an attack by Iran or its proxies as warnings grew of