Mon, Oct 06, 2014 - Page 6 News List

Scientists warn Nobel wait making prize ‘irrelevant’

AFP, STOCKHOLM

Awarding Nobels decades after the original scientific discovery could lead to the coveted prize becoming irrelevant, some observers say, as aging researchers miss out on their turn to get the long-awaited call from Sweden.

That is what happened in 2011 when the Nobel committee announced that half the prize for medicine and physiology would go to Canadian-born biologist Ralph Steinman.

It soon emerged that Steinman had died three days earlier, but the Nobel committee made an exception to its own rule that the prize cannot be awarded posthumously, arguing that it thought he was alive when it made the decision.

“If we keep going on like this, there will be many more cases of this kind. It’s just a matter of time. So something has to be done,” said Santo Fortunato, a physicist at Finland’s Aalto University.

Earlier this year, Fortunato and several other scientists wrote an article in the magazine Nature that documented how the wait was growing longer.

“Before 1940, Nobels were awarded more than 20 years after the original discovery for only about 11 percent of physics, 15 percent of chemistry and 24 percent of physiology or medicine prizes,” they wrote. “Since 1985, however, such lengthy delays have featured in 60 percent, 52 percent and 45 percent of these awards respectively.”

If the trend continues, they wrote, by the end of this century, the prizewinners’ predicted average age for receiving the award is likely to exceed their life expectancy.

In other words, most might be dead by the time they are in line for getting a Nobel prize.

“This lag threatens to undermine science’s most venerable institution,” they said in the article.

The criticism comes as the Nobel prizes in the sciences are set to be announced this week.

Proponents of the current Nobel arrangement say that it is in the nature of modern complex science for a discovery to be confirmed as bona fide only after lengthy testing.

The Higgs boson, for instance, whose discovery was honored with the physics prize last year, was hypothesized almost half a century ago.

However, the elusive subatomic particle, which gives other particles mass, was only finally proved in recent years with the help of massive and costly practical research.

By then, one of the three original discoverers of the Higgs boson, the US-Belgian physicist Robert Brout, had died.

For Sven Lidin, the chairman of the Nobel Committee for Chemistry, the Higgs boson is a good illustration of why it is almost impossible to push the process any quicker.

“We want to make sure that we award those who open the first door into new scientific insight. This means that naturally there is a delay,” he said. “Typically it takes about 20 years before the initial door opener has matured into a Nobel prize.”

And it guards against rushing to award breakthroughs that could later turn out to be less than meets the eye.

In 1989 two scientists announced the discovery of a technique for “cold fusion,” which would allow nuclear reactions at near room temperature, and, if proven, would solve most of the world’s energy problems permanently. A quarter century later, it remains unconfirmed.

“Every year there are lots of claims of amazing discoveries, and quite a few of them turn out to be not quite as amazing as everyone thought,” Lidin said. “Because of that, it’s a good idea to exercise some caution before bringing out the pom-poms and calling out for the cheerleaders.”

This story has been viewed 1878 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top