With legal battles over gay marriage simmering across the US, proponents are showcasing a group they had once sidelined: children.
Lawyers are recruiting same-sex couples who have children, putting interviews with kids as young as seven in court filings and organizing media events featuring teenagers.
In May, for example, after a Virginia federal appeals court hearing, Emily Schall-Townley, 16, told a news conference: “These are my two moms. And this is my family.”
The lawyers’ approach marks a strategic shift from several years ago, when proponents of gay marriage kept the focus away from children, if there were any.
Advocates were wary of provoking negative responses from judges and the public at a time when prevailing opinion was more likely to view children as harmed by gay marriage. As recently as 2006, when New York and Washington state high courts upheld bans on same-sex marriage, they sided with states that said having gay parents could hurt youngsters.
The New York court said: “A child benefits from having before his or her eyes, every day, living models of what both a man and woman are like.”
In the case of US v Windsor last year, in which the US Supreme Court extended federal spousal benefits to same-sex couples, Justice Anthony Kennedy — a moderate conservative appointed by former US president Ronald Reagan — turned that around when in the majority opinion, he wrote that the federal law that denied benefits to same-sex couples “humiliates” tens of thousands of their children.
In a separate dispute, involving California’s former ban on gay marriage known as Proposition 8, Kennedy said during oral arguments that 40,000 children in California who live with same-sex parents “want their parents to have full recognition and full status.”
The legal question in the Windsor case did not center on a right to same-sex marriage. Yet its legal reasoning sparked a wave of litigation challenging state gay-marriage bans that is poised to reach the Supreme Court next year, and judges in these cases are picking up on Kennedy’s comments about children.
At the Virginia hearing in May, US Circuit Court judge Roger Gregory asked a state lawyer: “Do you think the child loves the parents any less because they are same-sex parents?”
Others directly cited Kennedy.
In the nearly 20 cases decided so far since Windsor, every judge has ruled against the marriage bans; most cases are on appeal and prohibitions have not been lifted. The most recent decision came on Friday by the 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals, ruling on an Oklahoma law. Same-sex marriage is banned in 31 of the 50 states.
The legal questions involve equal protection, due process and state power. The issue of the welfare of children arises when states try to defend their authority to approve only opposite-sex marriage.
Defenders of the bans said they will continue to assert that same-sex unions harm children.
“We are not retreating,” said lawyer Jim Campbell, of the Alliance Defending Freedom, an Arizona-based Christian group that is defending states with marriage bans.
A main concern is that offspring of gay people often are conceived with anonymous egg or sperm donors.
“Children have a right to know where they come from,” Campbell said.
However, judges are disagreeing with studies put forth by gay-marriage opponents saying children fare better in homes with a mother and a father.
Last month, when a US appeals court ruled against Utah’s marriage ban, judge Carlos Lucero wrote that the best that gay-marriage opponents can say is that “the social science is unsettled.”
In most cases, judges decide the issue on written filings without a full-blown trial with witnesses.
The sole jurist to hold a trial in this current round of litigation, US District Court judge Bernard Friedman of Michigan, said that research questioning the competence of same-sex parents represents “a fringe viewpoint that is rejected ... across a variety of social science fields.”
CONFRONTATION: The water cannon attack was the second this month on the Philippine supply boat ‘Unaizah May 4,’ after an incident on March 5 The China Coast Guard yesterday morning blocked a Philippine supply vessel and damaged it with water cannons near a reef off the Southeast Asian country, the Philippines said. The Philippine military released video of what it said was a nearly hour-long attack off the Second Thomas Shoal (Renai Shoal, 仁愛暗沙) in the contested South China Sea, where Chinese ships have unleashed water cannons and collided with Philippine vessels in similar standoffs in the past few months. The China Coast Guard and other vessels “once again harassed, blocked, deployed water cannons, and executed dangerous maneuvers” against a routine rotation and resupply mission to
GLOBAL COMBAT AIR PROGRAM: The potential purchasers would be limited to the 15 nations with which Tokyo has signed defense partnership and equipment transfer deals Japan’s Cabinet yesterday approved a plan to sell future next-generation fighter jets that it is developing with the UK and Italy to other nations, in the latest move away from the country’s post-World War II pacifist principles. The contentious decision to allow international arms sales is expected to help secure Japan’s role in the joint fighter jet project, and is part of a move to build up the Japanese arms industry and bolster its role in global security. The Cabinet also endorsed a revision to Japan’s arms equipment and technology transfer guidelines to allow coproduced lethal weapons to be sold to nations
Thousands of devotees, some in a state of trance, gathered at a Buddhist temple on the outskirts of Bangkok renowned for sacred tattoos known as Sak Yant, paying their respects to a revered monk who mastered the practice and seeking purification. The gathering at Wat Bang Phra Buddhist temple is part of a Thai Wai Khru ritual in which devotees pay homage to Luang Phor Pern, the temple’s formal abbot, who died in 2002. He had a reputation for refining and popularizing the temple’s Sak Yant tattoo style. The idea that tattoos confer magical powers has existed in many parts of Asia
ON ALERT: A Russian cruise missile crossed into Polish airspace for about 40 seconds, the Polish military said, adding that it is constantly monitoring the war to protect its airspace Ukraine’s capital, Kyiv, and the western region of Lviv early yesterday came under a “massive” Russian air attack, officials said, while a Russian cruise missile breached Polish airspace, the Polish military said. Russia and Ukraine have been engaged in a series of deadly aerial attacks, with yesterday’s strikes coming a day after the Russian military said it had seized the Ukrainian village of Ivanivske, west of Bakhmut. A militant attack on a Moscow concert hall on Friday that killed at least 133 people also became a new flash point between the two archrivals. “Explosions in the capital. Air defense is working. Do not