Sat, Apr 05, 2014 - Page 5 News List

Election has potential to reset US-Kabul relations

AP, WASHINGTON

An Afghan election worker walks alongside a donkey as he transports election materials and ballot boxes to remote polling stations in Kishindih District of Balkh Province in northern Afghanistan on Thursday.

Photo: AFP

Afghanistan’s presidential election today gives the US a new chance to fix relations with Kabul, which are in deep discord after more than 12 years of war and repeated fallings-out between the White House and outgoing Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

While many Americans have given up hope that Afghanistan can ever prosper in peace, tens of thousands of Afghans, hoping for change, are flocking to campaign rallies across their impoverished country, which continues to face a stubborn insurgency.

By all accounts, there will be fraud and violence — no one knows how much to expect.

However, if the election is seen as credible and legitimate in the eyes of the Afghan people, it will signal a chance for the US to reset relations with a country where at least 2,176 members of the US military have died and billions of US tax dollars have been spent.

“It will be the start of a new chapter in our relationship — one where I hope we can get beyond focusing so much on one personality and the challenging aspects of that personality to a relationship that really is based on a number of profoundly shared strategic interests,” said Michele Flournoy, US undersecretary of defense for policy between 2009 and 2012.

However, corruption is a major US concern.

Karzai was brought to power in the wake of the 2001 US-led invasion.

In recent years, he has lashed out at the US, saying it has not brought peace to his country, only never-ending violence that has left tens of thousands of Afghan citizens dead.

Relations between Karzai and the US hit rock bottom late last year when the Afghan leader refused to sign a bilateral security agreement that sets the parameters for up to 10,000 troops to stay in Afghanistan after the NATO combat mission ends this year.

All candidates seeking to be Karzai’s successor have said they would sign the security agreement. Karzai himself apparently does not want his legacy to include a commitment to allow the deployment of international troops in his country any longer.

“It all turns to trust, and between me and America, there is not very good trust,” Karzai told a gathering late last year of 2,500 Afghan elders who urged him to approve the document.

The White House will continue to hear that complaint — a “thorn in the side of Mr Karzai” — from the newly elected president, said Omar Samad, former Afghan ambassador to Canada and France and a fellow at the New America Foundation in Washington.

He said the new Afghan president is likely to ask the US and the international community to deal with the “real issue of terrorism and radicalism in the region, and especially what is happening and what exists beyond our borders — the safe havens and the role that Pakistan can play.”

That complaint will likely require the US to come up with a new strategy, Samad said.

So far, US officials claim they have taken a hands-off approach to the election and have refrained from publicly backing any of the candidates.

With the possibility of a runoff election, it could be several months before a new Afghan leader takes office.

Unless there is a major upset, the US will be dealing with one of the three front-runners: Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai, a former Afghan finance minister and former World Bank employee; Abdullah Abdullah, Karzai’s leading opponent in the 2009 election; and Zalmai Rassoul, former Afghan foreign minister and national security adviser to the Karzai government.

This story has been viewed 922 times.
TOP top