A US judge on Monday struck a first blow against the US National Security Agency’s (NSA) bulk collection of telephone records, ruling it breaches citizens’ privacy to an “almost Orwellian” degree that is probably unconstitutional.
The scathing ruling by a US federal judge in Washington was stayed pending appeal, but if upheld it could lead to the spy agency being barred from indiscriminately gathering metadata on millions of private calls.
While not a final judgment, the ruling put the US administration on the back foot at the start of what will no doubt be a protracted series of legal challenges to the NSA’s global surveillance network.
It was also seized upon by fugitive intelligence leaker Edward Snowden to support his case that he is a whistleblower exposing official overreach, rather than a traitor endangering US security.
“I cannot imagine a more indiscriminate and arbitrary invasion than this systematic and high-tech collection and retention of personal data on virtually every single citizen,” US District Court Judge Richard Leon said.
Leon argued that US founding father James Madison, one of the authors of the US Constitution, would be “aghast” at the government’s “almost Orwellian” breach of citizens’ rights to privacy.
He also took aim at US government claims that the scale of data-gathering was necessary to thwart terrorist plots.
“The government does not cite a single instance in which analysis of the NSA’s bulk metadata collection actually stopped an imminent attack, or otherwise aided the government in achieving any objective that was time-sensitive in nature,” Leon wrote.
The NSA refused to comment on the ruling. The US Department of Justice said it was examining the ruling.
“We believe the program is constitutional as previous judges have found,” a Justice Department spokesman said. “We have no further comment at this time.”
Two plaintiffs, Larry Klayman and Charles Strange, brought a case against US President Barack Obama’s administration after Snowden revealed the vast scale of the NSA’s digital dragnet.
Documents provided by Snowden to the Guardian revealed that the NSA had compelled US telecom giant Verizon to provide agents with its clients’ telephone call metadata.
Subsequent leaks from his vast trove of classified documents suggest that other telephone and Internet providers have also provided private details on both US and foreign clients.
Leon’s ruling would bar the US government from continuing to siphon off metadata without judicial approval, but he did not issue an immediate injunction against the practice. Instead the case will go to appeal.
“In the months ahead other ... courts, no doubt will wrestle to find the proper balance consistent with our constitutional system,” Leon said in a written judgment.
Obama’s administration has condemned Snowden’s leaks and insists that collecting metadata — the time, duration and destination of calls, but not their content — is not unconstitutional.
US spy chiefs say that by joining the dots between archived calls and terrorist suspects they can keep the US safe, but this case will not be the last legal challenge the program faces.
On Friday last week, an official panel handed Obama a secret review of the NSA’s electronic surveillance program along with more than 40 recommendations to install safeguards and limit its scope. However, the administration is not expected to significantly curtail the NSA’s mission, despite international outrage, and Snowden remains a fugitive granted temporary asylum in Russia.
Leon said the appeal process would take at least six months and delayed his order “in light of the significant national security interests at stake ... and the novelty of the constitutional issues.”
Snowden, who worked as a contractor for the NSA, expressed satisfaction in a statement passed to the New York Times by journalist Glenn Greenwald.
“I acted on my belief that the NSA’s mass surveillance programs would not withstand a constitutional challenge and that the American public deserved a chance to see these issues determined by open courts,” Snowden said. “Today, a secret program authorized by a secret court was, when exposed to the light of day, found to violate Americans’ rights. It is the first of many.”
The Electronic Frontier Foundation, which campaigns for Internet freedoms, welcomed the ruling.
“It shows that the judiciary is looking at this program and does not agree that it is legal,” foundation attorney Kurt Opsahl said.
Republican US lawmakers on Friday criticized US President Joe Biden’s administration after sanctioned Chinese telecoms equipment giant Huawei unveiled a laptop this week powered by an Intel artificial intelligence (AI) chip. The US placed Huawei on a trade restriction list in 2019 for contravening Iran sanctions, part of a broader effort to hobble Beijing’s technological advances. Placement on the list means the company’s suppliers have to seek a special, difficult-to-obtain license before shipping to it. One such license, issued by then-US president Donald Trump’s administration, has allowed Intel to ship central processors to Huawei for use in laptops since 2020. China hardliners
A top Vietnamese property tycoon was on Thursday sentenced to death in one of the biggest corruption cases in history, with an estimated US$27 billion in damages. A panel of three hand-picked jurors and two judges rejected all defense arguments by Truong My Lan, chair of major developer Van Thinh Phat, who was found guilty of swindling cash from Saigon Commercial Bank (SCB) over a decade. “The defendant’s actions ... eroded people’s trust in the leadership of the [Communist] Party and state,” read the verdict at the trial in Ho Chi Minh City. After the five-week trial, 85 others were also sentenced on
Conjoined twins Lori and George Schappell, who pursued separate careers, interests and relationships during lives that defied medical expectations, died this month in Pennsylvania, funeral home officials said. They were 62. The twins, listed by Guinness World Records as the oldest living conjoined twins, died on April 7 at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, obituaries posted by Leibensperger Funeral Homes of Hamburg said. The cause of death was not detailed. “When we were born, the doctors didn’t think we’d make 30, but we proved them wrong,” Lori said in an interview when they turned 50, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported. The
RAMPAGE: A Palestinian man was left dead after dozens of Israeli settlers searching for a missing 14-year-old boy stormed a village in the Israeli-occupied West Bank US President Joe Biden on Friday said he expected Iran to attack Israel “sooner, rather than later” and warned Tehran not to proceed. Asked by reporters about his message to Iran, Biden simply said: “Don’t,” underscoring Washington’s commitment to defend Israel. “We are devoted to the defense of Israel. We will support Israel. We will help defend Israel and Iran will not succeed,” he said. Biden said he would not divulge secure information, but said his expectation was that an attack could come “sooner, rather than later.” Israel braced on Friday for an attack by Iran or its proxies as warnings grew of