Despite mass protests, accusations of rigged elections, a brief hunger strike by a prince and a threatened boycott of parliament by his rivals, the long-ruling Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen remains firmly in control.
After his worst poll result in 15 years and a series of demonstrations drawing tens of thousands of people, experts say the former Khmer Rouge fighter-turned-prime minister must realize that something has to change.
“Hun Sen got a huge kick — a huge wake-up call — during the election,” Cambodian Center for Human Rights president Ou Virak said. “So I think Hun Sen is getting the message that people are not happy with the way he runs the country.”
Three days of demonstrations descended into violence earlier this month when a protester was shot dead as security forces clashed with a stone-throwing crowd.
Cambodia’s political crisis faces a crucial juncture this week with the opposition set to boycott parliament when it convenes today unless Hun Sen agrees to its demand for an independent probe into the disputed July polls.
Several rounds of talks between Hun Sen and Cambodian opposition leader Sam Rainsy over the past week failed to break the deadlock, raising fears of a protracted dispute and further mass protests. The two sides agreed to seek a nonviolent solution to the impasse and made a vague pledge to set up a mechanism to bring about election reform.
The key demand of the opposition Cambodian National Rescue Party (CNRP) is for an independent “truth committee” to investigate Hun Sen’s controversial election victory. On that, the prime minister has refused to budge.
The crisis took a new twist on Friday when a pro-opposition Cambodian prince — the cousin of Cambodian King Norodom Sihamoni — went on hunger strike in protest at Hun Sen’s contested win, demanding “justice for voters.”
His protest ended on Saturday after military police expelled him from the pagoda where he was holding the hunger strike.
Experts say that ultimately the emergence of a more vocal and emboldened opposition should be positive for a country that has been run almost single-handedly by Hun Sen for 28 years.
“We’re moving towards a two-party system, which is good for the country, for a healthy democracy,” said independent analyst Lao Mong Hay, a former researcher for the Asian Human Rights Commission.
According to official results of the July election, the Cambodian People’s Party won 68 seats against 55 for the CNRP.
The opposition has rejected the tally, alleging widespread vote irregularities.
The CNRP has warned of further protests unless Hun Sen agrees to its demands, which also include an overhaul of the National Election Committee. The questions now, say experts, are how much ground Hun Sen will be willing to cede to the opposition and how his rivals will use their new-found political clout.
“The natural role of the opposition in Cambodia in the past has been defensive, the role of a victim, impulsive and not very disciplined,” said Jackson Cox, an analyst with the consultancy firm Woodmont International. “They should and must demonstrate they are not the opposition party of the past. They have to act proactively.”
The CNRP faces a dilemma — if it refuses to compromise, it risks losing its voice in parliament. However, if it strikes a deal with Hun Sen that leaves the strongman in power, then it could face a backlash from its supporters who appear hungry for change.