Iran and world powers have concluded a surprisingly cordial summit in Kazakhstan that appears to have given a gentle nudge to the decade-long nuclear stalemate, experts said.
Two days of talks in the soaring Tien Shan mountain city of Almaty concluded on Wednesday amid continued saber-rattling from Israel and worry on international oil markets about the prospects of yet another Middle East war.
However, Iran and the five permanent members of the UN Security Council — the US, China, Russia, Britain and France — plus Germany, did agree to hold new talks on the Islamic republic’s disputed nuclear drive in the coming weeks.
Iran flatly denies charges that it is enriching uranium at an increasingly rapid pace in order to one day build a nuclear weapon.
However, Israel and its main ally the US have few doubts this is exactly the case.
The issue has been debated on three prior occasions in the past year alone. The last meeting between Iran and the leading powers, known as P5+1, ended in June without the sides able to agree to meet again.
Things went differently this time. The meeting saw the leading powers offer Iran a softening of non-oil or financial sector-related sanctions in exchange for concessions over its uranium enrichment operations.
Encouraged by the possible sanctions relief, Tehran said the parties had agreed to hold their next meeting at the same venue on April 5 and 6, after talks between senior civil servants on the issue in Istanbul next month.
“Some of the points raised in their [the world powers’] response were more realistic, compared to what they said in the past,” chief Iranian negotiator Saeed Jalili told reporters in words that amounted to rare praise.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad later added that “negotiations are better than confrontation,” while Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi said “things are taking a turning point.”
The tone — if not the actual content of what was achieved in Kazakhstan — left some analysts both surprised and impressed.
“This is interesting because what we are seeing is the start of a process,” Moscow’s PIR nuclear safety research institute analyst Andrei Baklitsky said.
“The positions are slowly starting to merge. In other words, there are finally things there for them to discuss,” he aid.
One analyst said the key was to break the initial ice and find a single issue around which future contacts could build.
“The most important development is that we might have a basis for further negotiation. In all previous talks, each side categorically dismissed the other’s opening position,” Shashank Joshi of the Royal United Services Institute said.
All sides agree there is little more time to waste and it is unclear what impact there will be from a looming June presidential vote in which Iranians will elect a successor to Ahmadinejad.
The sanctions are starting to bite at home and Jalili may be prepared to offer more flexibility if ordinary Iranians are starting to tire of their increasing isolation from the global economy.
US officials have been keen to call the Almaty session “useful” — a more neutral word than either “positive” or “negative.”
However, they also pointed out that a good atmosphere during negotiations does not necessarily produce workable compromises.
“What matters are the results,” a senior US official said.
“You care about the atmospherics, but in the end, you need concrete results,” the official said.
And those — in Washington’s eyes — would see Iran halt uranium enrichment to the 20 percent levels experts view as within striking distance of weapons-grade matter.
Iranians like Jalili argue that the West is not even making 20 percent enrichment an issue worthy of discussion at this stage — a claim refuted by the US official.
Yet there is little doubt that the spirit of the discussion has changed.
“In past meetings, the approach centered on coercion: The main motivator for concessions was the threat of new sanctions and other escalatory steps,” National Iranian American Council president Trita Parsi said.
“That approach has failed as Iran responded with its own escalation: It expanded its enrichment activities, installed new and improved centrifuges and amassed more enriched uranium,” Parsi said.
That policy ran the region toward the very real danger of Israeli action — a convincing argument for a strategy shift.
Now the world powers appear to be willing to take the first step by offering sanctions relief, and may find a more responsive Iran in return, experts said.
“Jalili’s positive, conciliatory statements today represent a meaningful shift away from that pattern of mutual disdain,” Joshi said.
“It makes it more likely that Iran will, in due course, be able to come up with a more realistic counteroffer,” he said.
Republican US lawmakers on Friday criticized US President Joe Biden’s administration after sanctioned Chinese telecoms equipment giant Huawei unveiled a laptop this week powered by an Intel artificial intelligence (AI) chip. The US placed Huawei on a trade restriction list in 2019 for contravening Iran sanctions, part of a broader effort to hobble Beijing’s technological advances. Placement on the list means the company’s suppliers have to seek a special, difficult-to-obtain license before shipping to it. One such license, issued by then-US president Donald Trump’s administration, has allowed Intel to ship central processors to Huawei for use in laptops since 2020. China hardliners
Conjoined twins Lori and George Schappell, who pursued separate careers, interests and relationships during lives that defied medical expectations, died this month in Pennsylvania, funeral home officials said. They were 62. The twins, listed by Guinness World Records as the oldest living conjoined twins, died on April 7 at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, obituaries posted by Leibensperger Funeral Homes of Hamburg said. The cause of death was not detailed. “When we were born, the doctors didn’t think we’d make 30, but we proved them wrong,” Lori said in an interview when they turned 50, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported. The
RAMPAGE: A Palestinian man was left dead after dozens of Israeli settlers searching for a missing 14-year-old boy stormed a village in the Israeli-occupied West Bank US President Joe Biden on Friday said he expected Iran to attack Israel “sooner, rather than later” and warned Tehran not to proceed. Asked by reporters about his message to Iran, Biden simply said: “Don’t,” underscoring Washington’s commitment to defend Israel. “We are devoted to the defense of Israel. We will support Israel. We will help defend Israel and Iran will not succeed,” he said. Biden said he would not divulge secure information, but said his expectation was that an attack could come “sooner, rather than later.” Israel braced on Friday for an attack by Iran or its proxies as warnings grew of
IN PURSUIT: Israel’s defense minister said the revenge attacks by Israeli settlers would make it difficult for security forces to find those responsible for the 14-year-old’s death Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Saturday condemned the “heinous murder” of an Israeli teenager in the occupied West Bank as attacks on Palestinian villages intensified following news of his death. After Benjamin Achimeir, 14, was reported missing near Ramallah on Friday, hundreds of Jewish settlers backed by Israeli forces raided nearby Palestinian villages, torching vehicles and homes, leaving at least one villager dead and dozens wounded. The attacks escalated in several villages on Saturday after Achimeir’s body was found near the Malachi Hashalom outpost. Agence France-Presse correspondents saw smoke rising from burned houses and fields. Mayor Amin Abu Alyah, of the