Thu, Nov 29, 2012 - Page 7 News List

US servicewomen sue over combat ban


US Army soldiers with the 2-17 Field Artillery Regiment listen to a briefing as they prepare to leave on a mission in Ramadi, 100km west of Baghdad, on Oct. 26, 2004.

Photo: AFP

Four US servicewomen, including two who won Purple Hearts in Afghanistan, sued the Pentagon on Tuesday over its policy barring women from ground combat.

Backed by rights watchdog the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), they slammed the policy as an “injustice to the women ... who continue to put their lives on the line for their country.”

In practice women have served in combat roles for years, they said — but US military policy still bans them, resulting in a “brass ceiling” in which women cannot be promoted because of lack of recognized combat experience.

“Ever since I was a little girl I wanted to be an air force pilot and I have proven my ability every step of the way,” said Major Mary Jennings Hegar, a rescue helicopter pilot who flew Medevac missions in Afghanistan.

Her aircraft was shot down in 2009 while rescuing three injured soldiers and she had to fight, returning fire and sustaining shrapnel wounds. She was awarded the Purple Heart and Distinguished Flying Cross with Valor.

“The ability to serve in combat has very little to do with gender or any other generalization. It has everything to do with heart, character, ability, determination and dedication,” said the 36-year-old, quoted by the ACLU.

Women are still barred from ground combat units, although female troops have found themselves in combat anyway over the past decade in Afghanistan and Iraq, with more than 140 killed on the battlefield.

“Women have more equal opportunity to die for serving their country than to actually be allowed to serve their country,” said army Staff Sergeant Jennifer Hunt, who won a Purple Heart after her vehicle was hit by a roadside bomb.

“The gap between the policy and reality is bad for the armed forces, bad for service members and needs to be changed,” added First Lieutenant Colleen Farrell of the US Marine Corps, speaking to reporters in a conference call.

In February, the Pentagon announced incremental changes that will allow women to serve in more than 14,000 jobs, mostly in the army and Marine Corps, that had previously been closed to female service members.

However, the overall prohibition against women in ground combat remains, denying women the chance to join infantry and armor units as well as special forces.

The ACLU said that 238,000 jobs in the military still remain closed to women. Tuesday’s lawsuit was filed in federal court in San Francisco, by the four servicewomen and the Service Women’s Action Network, represented by the ACLU’s Northern Californian office and the law firm Munger, Tolles and Olson.

It names US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta as the defendant.

Pentagon spokesman George Little said Panetta was committed to expanding women’s roles in the US military.

“On his watch, some 14,500 positions have been made been available to women, and he has directed the services to explore the possibility of opening additional roles for women in the military,” he said.

Along with Hegar, Farrell and Hunt, the fourth plaintiff in the lawsuit is Captain Zoe Bedell, whose US Marine Corps Female Engagement Teams teams lived with infantrymen and frequently encountered combat situations.

This story has been viewed 1840 times.

Comments will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned.

TOP top