More than 40 years after Neil Armstrong landed on the moon, humans continue to push the frontiers of space exploration, but missions are being tempered by costs, a trend that concerned the astronaut.
The blank check from government that financed adventures in the Cold War-era is no longer available, with today’s missions depending more on the private sector and international cooperation — often because of budget considerations.
Armstrong, who died on Saturday, criticized US President Barack Obama in 2010 for cost-cutting plans that, in part, retired the US space shuttles — effectively ending the US role in sending humans out of Earth’s orbit.
RUSSIAN ROCKETS
Now, US astronauts — whose predecessors worked feverishly to beat Russia’s efforts to the moon — ride as passengers on Russian spacecraft and hopes for NASA’s own future manned flights to the International Space Station are pinned on private companies, which are trying to build cheaper shuttle alternatives.
Armstrong feared becoming reliant on other nations for spaceflight and believed private companies would take too long to develop new space-worthy vehicles.
“I support the encouragement of the newcomers toward their goal of lower cost access to space,” Armstrong said, and added “but having cut my teeth in rockets more than 50 years ago, I am not confident.”
GLOBAL CHANGES
However, US analysts say the country’s space program had no choice but to change, given new global realities.
“The world evolves, humanity evolves, our capabilities evolve and the future of space exploration, therefore, must also evolve,” said Jeff Foust, an aerospace consultant and the editor of TheSpaceReview.com.
For one thing, flights into lower-Earth-orbit are now routine and privatizing them allows the space agency to focus its efforts on more cutting edge missions, according to Foust.
However, there are no footsteps on Mars and many other hopes that were dreamed of when Armstrong and Apollo 11 crewmate Buzz Aldrin helped mankind make its “giant leap” in 1969 are still unrealized.
Foust said the succeed-at-any-cost mentality that drove the Apollo program to get the first person on the moon cannot be replicated.
That program “was the result of the particular geopolitical factors, that Cold War atmosphere,” Foust explained.
“We need to find different approaches that can be sustained, probably at lower funding levels than we had under Apollo, but over longer periods of time,” he added.
Roger Launius, senior curator and historian at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum, noted that Obama’s cuts at NASA follow two decades of financial slashing since the Cold War ended.
MASSIVE BUDGETS
At the height of the moon-landing effort, NASA was allocated fully 5 percent of the federal budget, Launius said.
For much of the 1970s and 1980s, NASA’s share stayed steady at 1 percent, he explained, but “today it’s less than one-half of 1 percent of the federal budget.”
Still Launius insisted the US space program continues to make important gains — not least of which was landing the Curiosity rover on Mars last month.
Over the next decade, Launius said, “we’re going to send robots literally all over the solar system. We’re doing that now and we’re going to learn more about the cosmos. We’re also sending robots and satellites into space to monitor Earth to understand what’s happening here.
“That’s not personal jet packs and its not colonies on the moon. It’s not the Jetsons,” he joked, referring to a once-popular cartoon about a space-age family.
“It is very real and very important,” he added.
However, these missions have often failed to stoke the public’s imagination the way Apollo’s astronauts once did.
One consequence is a ricochet effect on NASA’s ability to do the bigger more ambitious projects that do inspire people, said Keith Cowing, a former NASA employee and editor at NASAwatch.com, an unaffiliated Web site following the agency’s activities.
“NASA needs to be able to tell its story far better than it does. If people truly understood what space exploration is about, and the promise that it offers, they’d be clamoring to triple NASA’s budget,” he said.
Barring that, Foust said international cooperation and private sector gains will allow greater achievements all round.
“International partnerships” — like the ones behind the International Space Station — “give us the tool to do things that would be more difficult or impossible for individual nations to do,” he said.
Such a model will likely form the basis of future human space exploration, “particularly the really big and expensive missions like sending people to Mars.”
CONFRONTATION: The water cannon attack was the second this month on the Philippine supply boat ‘Unaizah May 4,’ after an incident on March 5 The China Coast Guard yesterday morning blocked a Philippine supply vessel and damaged it with water cannons near a reef off the Southeast Asian country, the Philippines said. The Philippine military released video of what it said was a nearly hour-long attack off the Second Thomas Shoal (Renai Shoal, 仁愛暗沙) in the contested South China Sea, where Chinese ships have unleashed water cannons and collided with Philippine vessels in similar standoffs in the past few months. The China Coast Guard and other vessels “once again harassed, blocked, deployed water cannons, and executed dangerous maneuvers” against a routine rotation and resupply mission to
GLOBAL COMBAT AIR PROGRAM: The potential purchasers would be limited to the 15 nations with which Tokyo has signed defense partnership and equipment transfer deals Japan’s Cabinet yesterday approved a plan to sell future next-generation fighter jets that it is developing with the UK and Italy to other nations, in the latest move away from the country’s post-World War II pacifist principles. The contentious decision to allow international arms sales is expected to help secure Japan’s role in the joint fighter jet project, and is part of a move to build up the Japanese arms industry and bolster its role in global security. The Cabinet also endorsed a revision to Japan’s arms equipment and technology transfer guidelines to allow coproduced lethal weapons to be sold to nations
‘POLITICAL EARTHQUAKE’: Leo Varadkar said he was ‘no longer the best person’ to lead the nation and was stepping down for political, as well as personal, reasons Leo Varadkar on Wednesday announced that he was stepping down as Ireland’s prime minister and leader of the Fine Gael party in the governing coalition, citing “personal and political” reasons. Pundits called the surprise move, just 10 weeks before Ireland holds European Parliament and local elections, a “political earthquake.” A general election has to be held within a year. Irish Deputy Prime Minister Micheal Martin, leader of Fianna Fail, the main coalition partner, said Varadkar’s announcement was “unexpected,” but added that he expected the government to run its full term. An emotional Varadkar, who is in his second stint as prime minister and at
Thousands of devotees, some in a state of trance, gathered at a Buddhist temple on the outskirts of Bangkok renowned for sacred tattoos known as Sak Yant, paying their respects to a revered monk who mastered the practice and seeking purification. The gathering at Wat Bang Phra Buddhist temple is part of a Thai Wai Khru ritual in which devotees pay homage to Luang Phor Pern, the temple’s formal abbot, who died in 2002. He had a reputation for refining and popularizing the temple’s Sak Yant tattoo style. The idea that tattoos confer magical powers has existed in many parts of Asia