Tue, Jul 10, 2012 - Page 7 News List

Morsi challenges Egypt’s generals

AUDACIOUS MOVE:Factions were divided over the president’s decree, with some saying that he had set a dangerous precedent by overruling the Supreme Court

NY Times News Service, CAIRO

Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi on Sunday unexpectedly ordered the country’s Islamist-led parliament to reconvene, challenging decisions by Egypt’s most powerful generals and judges to dissolve the legislative body.

Morsi’s decree appeared to be a bold effort to claim authority for his 10-day-old presidency, and it raised the specter of a new confrontation between the president and his Islamist supporters on the one hand, and the military council and Egypt’s highest court on the other. The announcement sowed confusion in Cairo, not least over whether Morsi had the power to issue such a decree.

The speaker of the parliament said it would meet within “hours.” Military officers, judges and political parties all announced emergency meetings. Beyond that, there was no immediate response from the military council, which took power in Egypt after former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak was forced from office last year.

Some analysts said it seemed likely that the army knew of Morsi’s plans, while others found it hard to believe the generals would tolerate such an open challenge to their power.

“The decree could create a political crisis,” said Gamal Eid, a prominent human rights lawyer. “He has been waiting to make a decision to prove he is president of a republic.”

The military council ordered parliament dissolved just before the presidential election last month, after a court ruled that the law under which it had been elected was partly unconstitutional. In the same stroke, the military assumed legislative power and severely limited the authority of the presidency, in what many likened to a coup aimed at curbing the power of the Muslim Brotherhood, the Islamist movement that held about half the seats in parliament.

When Morsi, the Brotherhood’s candidate, won the presidency, many wondered whether he would directly confront the military council, known as the SCAF, or seek an accommodation, an approach the Brotherhood often seemed to favor.

“This could be the early signs of a deal, or the early signs of a battle between the military council and the Brothers,” said Ahmed Ragheb, a human rights lawyer. “Morsi used his powers as president, just like the military used its power as acting president before.”

The announcement on Sunday suggested Morsi was willing to stake his credibility on a challenge to the military’s version of power sharing, which left the president’s legislative agenda and even his budget dependent on the generals.

The decree “certainly amounts to a confrontation with the judiciary,” said Nathan Brown, a political science professor at George Washington University.

“It probably amounts to a very bold confrontation with the SCAF as well, though we don’t know what understanding may have been reached there,” he said.

Morsi’s decree comes with a time limit: Parliament is to serve only until a new constitution can be completed, followed by fresh legislative elections within 60 days. Brown and others suggested that this provision was intended to soften the blow to the military, if only slightly, by acknowledging the court’s demand for a new parliament.

The wording of the decree left many questions unanswered. It was not clear whether the new election would replace the entire parliament, or just the members whose seats were most at issue in the court case, amounting to one-third of the total. Analysts also pointed out that any laws passed by the reconvened parliament could be vulnerable to strong legal challenges.

This story has been viewed 1938 times.

Comments will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned.

TOP top