Fri, May 04, 2012 - Page 5 News List

US-Afghan security pact signed

LONG-TERM PRESENCE:Despite the coming exit of combat troops, US special forces will likely stay on in the country to train police forces and hunt down al-Qaeda militants

AP, KABUL

Afghan President Hamid Karzai has branded his US allies as corrupt, wasteful and contemptuous of Afghan lives. Once he even threatened to join the Taliban. Nonetheless, Karzai signed a deal that could keep thousands of US troops in his country for years.

Despite his rhetoric, Karzai needs international support if Afghanistan is to survive economically and avoid descending into civil war like it did when the Soviets left two decades ago.

The signing of the long-term strategic partnership, which will govern the relationship between the two countries from the end of 2014 until 2024, was welcomed on Wednesday by leading Afghans as a positive message that the West will not turn its back on their country.

It also gives Afghanistan much-needed military support to deal with an insurgency that shows no signs of abating. Less than two hours after US President Barack Obama left Afghanistan early on Wednesday, the Taliban carried out a suicide attack in the capital against a heavily fortified compound housing hundreds of foreigners, killing at least seven Afghan civilians.

“Karzai was thinking that maybe it is good for the national interest of Afghanistan, its stability, peace and security. Without the Americans, peace and stability is difficult,” said Wahid Muzhda, a leading political analyst and ethnic Pashtun — the community from which the Taliban draws most of their members.

Even Pakistan, which has been accused by the US of not doing enough to dismantle insurgent safe havens on its territory, would benefit from a continued US presence in Afghanistan, some analysts say.

Riffat Hussain, a professor of Defense Studies at Quaid-e-Azam University in Islamabad, -acknowledged that some Pakistani officials, especially in the military, are worried that the US-supported Afghan government is too cozy with Pakistan’s archenemy, India. However, he said that many officials are even more concerned about what will happen in Afghanistan if international forces leave.

“Many in Pakistan think continued American military and NATO presence is not necessarily a bad thing because in the absence of their presence, Afghanistan is more likely to descend into chaos,” Hussain said.

The agreement is widely expected to be approved by the 249-member Afghan parliament, possibly as early as next week.

“As long as it is good for the country and good for the Afghan people, we would like to vote in favor of it. We would like to accept that partnership with a very clear stand, a stand which will assure Afghans that Afghanistan will be a prosperous country,” said parliament member Shukria Barekzai, a Pashtun.

The partnership accord has been described as the capstone in a series of agreements that Afghanistan is signing with US allies. A failure to make a deal with the US would have endangered pacts it has already signed with the US’ NATO allies, including Britain.

“The signing of strategic -partnerships with European countries and especially the United States is to the benefit of Afghanistan,” said Nazir Ahmad Hanafi, a member of Afghanistan’s parliament and supreme religious council who hails from the western city of Herat.

The deal signed overnight by Obama and Karzai does not commit the US to any specific troop presence or spending. However, it does give the US the option of keeping forces in Afghanistan after combat troops withdraw by 2014 for two specific purposes: training of Afghan forces and operations against al-Qaeda. The terror group is -present in Pakistan, but has only a nominal presence inside Afghanistan.

This story has been viewed 1991 times.
TOP top