Simply eating more healthily may improve the behavior of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) if therapy and medication fail, a study published in the journal Pediatrics said yesterday.
However, researchers said that their review of recent controlled scientific studies had shown conflicting evidence on the impact of supplements and restricted diets — in some cases they were no better than the placebo effect.
Nutritional interventions should therefore be considered an alternative or secondary approach to treating ADHD, not a first-line attack, the review by doctors at Northwestern University Medical School in Chicago said.
“Supplemental diet therapy is simple, relatively inexpensive and more acceptable to patient and parent,” than strict additive-free diets that have been popular in the past, the study said. “Public education regarding a healthy diet pattern and lifestyle to prevent or control ADHD may have greater long-term success.”
The study reviewed research published on the sugar-restricted, additive-free Feingold Diet, megavitamin therapies, omega-3 fatty acid supplementation and the suspected link between ADHD and a “Western-style” high-fat, low-fiber diet.
Three to 5 percent of US schoolchildren, or almost 5 million youths, have been diagnosed with ADHD, which involves hyperactive behavior, inability to pay attention and impulsivity. It is often treated with stimulant medications, such as the controversial Ritalin drug.
The precise causes of ADHD are unknown, although studies have pointed to hereditary factors as well as social and environmental influences. Eating high-sugar and high-fat foods may exacerbate symptoms, some research has shown.
However, while proposed interventions such as giving iron supplements or cutting out additives and food dyes have soared in popularity in recent years, the Pediatrics article said there is little solid science to back up those claims.
For instance, the much-hyped Feingold Diet, which advocates no red or orange color dyes in food as well as no apples, grapes, deli, sausage or hot dogs, was highly touted in the 1970s and 1980s for improving symptoms in more than half of ADHD children.
“Controlled studies failed to confirm the effectiveness of the diet to the extent claimed,” the -Pediatrics review said, adding that the regimen was very difficult for many parents to follow.
Similarly, studies focused on getting rid of potential allergens in the diet, such as wheat, eggs, chocolate, cheese and nuts, have shown limited success with some ADHD kids, “but a placebo effect could not be excluded,” the study said.
Even when it comes to sugar and diet soda, two elements that many parents believe can trigger hyperactivity in children, scientific studies have been unable to prove a definitive link.
“The majority of controlled studies fail to demonstrate a significant adverse effect of sucrose or aspartame,” the study said.
The authors said that avoiding the consumption of high sugar foods by young children “may prevent diet-related exacerbations of ADHD.”
However, when parents restrict a child’s sugar intake in order to ward off bad behavior, their inherent belief that it will work is likely to blur any objective assessment of whether it works or not.
“In practice, the link between sugar and hyperactive behavior is so universal in the opinion of parents of children with ADHD that no controlled study or physician counsel is likely to change this perception,” the study said.