The Australian government is set to pass laws for its 30 percent mining profits tax later this week after agreeing to lift the starting threshold and promising more scrutiny of coal seam gas projects in a deal to win support from three key independent MPs.
The changes, however, which will cost about A$20 million (US$19.8 million) a year in lost government revenue, have upset the Australian Greens, whose support is needed to pass the laws, and done little to allay concerns of small and mid-tier mining companies.
AGREEMENT
Under the agreement with independent lawmaker Andrew Wilkie, the government would lift the starting profits threshold for the tax from A$50 million to A$75 million, although smaller iron ore miner BC Iron said the changes would give no relief to smaller companies.
“It’s like painting that house full of termites,” BC Iron chief executive Mike Young said. “To put A$75 million into context, at current iron prices, that’s our margin on maybe 1.2 million tonnes.”
Gillard’s government, which holds a one-seat majority with support from one Green and the three independent MPs, wants the mining tax passed by the lower Australian House of Representatives by the end of the week.
The government wants the tax on iron ore and coal mine profits, due to start in July next year, to raise about A$7.7 billion in its first two years, and Australian Treasurer Wayne Swan said the changes meant the biggest miners would pay the most.
“Most of this money will now be paid by the largest miners in this country,” Swan told parliament.
A government deal with two other independents, Tony Windsor and Rob Oakeshott, earmarks A$200 million over five years for scientific research into coal seam gas projects, to allow governments to better assess the impact on water and farming.
The government wants to slap the proposed tax on big iron ore and coal miners as part of reforms designed to balance its budget and reallocate wealth from the mining industry, now enjoying the biggest boom in a century, to other sectors.
The government and global miners BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto and Xstrata agreed on the mining tax last year, but smaller miners such as Australia’s Fortescue Metals Group have complained that the tax favors big miners.
However, Simon Bennison, chief executive of the Association of Mining and Exploration Companies, said his group would -continue to push for the tax to be based on a production threshold instead of a profit threshold.
Bennison said 10 million tonnes per year would be a good starting point.
“Iron ore prices are not going to stay at high levels forever, they have already fallen quite a lot and the profitability levels of companies are all different,” he said.
SURPLUS BUDGET
The mining tax will help the government return the budget to surplus and fund a 1 percentage point cut in the company tax rate to 29 percent, portrayed as a boost for non-mining sectors, especially those hit hard by a strong local currency.
The Greens, however, who want the tax rate to be lifted to 40 percent and for the tax to also apply to uranium and gold mines, said they now wanted to be sure the government did not cut other areas of the budget to fund Wilkie’s amendments.
“We are going to ensure that the public interest be upheld here. We will be talking to the government in the coming day or two,” Greens leader Bob Brown told reporters.
The government needs the Greens to pass the mining tax through parliament’s Senate upper house, where a vote is due early next year.
Nearly half of China’s major cities are suffering “moderate to severe” levels of subsidence, putting millions of people at risk of flooding, especially as sea levels rise, according to a study of nationwide satellite data released yesterday. The authors of the paper, published by the journal Science, found that 45 percent of China’s urban land was sinking faster than 3mm per year, with 16 percent at more than 10mm per year, driven not only by declining water tables, but also the sheer weight of the built environment. With China’s urban population already in excess of 900 million people, “even a small portion
UNSETTLING IMAGES: The scene took place in front of TV crews covering the Trump trial, with a CNN anchor calling it an ‘emotional and unbelievably disturbing moment’ A man who doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire outside the courthouse where former US president Donald Trump is on trial has died, police said yesterday. The New York City Police Department (NYPD) said the man was declared dead by staff at an area hospital. The man was in Collect Pond Park at about 1:30pm on Friday when he took out pamphlets espousing conspiracy theories, tossed them around, then doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire, officials and witnesses said. A large number of police officers were nearby when it happened. Some officers and bystanders rushed
HYPOCRISY? The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday asked whether Biden was talking about China or the US when he used the word ‘xenophobic’ US President Joe Biden on Wednesday called for a hike in steel tariffs on China, accusing Beijing of cheating as he spoke at a campaign event in Pennsylvania. Biden accused China of xenophobia, too, in a speech to union members in Pittsburgh. “They’re not competing, they’re cheating. They’re cheating and we’ve seen the damage here in America,” Biden said. Chinese steel companies “don’t need to worry about making a profit because the Chinese government is subsidizing them so heavily,” he said. Biden said he had called for the US Trade Representative to triple the tariff rates for Chinese steel and aluminum if Beijing was
Beijing is continuing to commit genocide and crimes against humanity against Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities in its western Xinjiang province, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a report published on Monday, ahead of his planned visit to China this week. The State Department’s annual human rights report, which documents abuses recorded all over the world during the previous calendar year, repeated language from previous years on the treatment of Muslims in Xinjiang, but the publication raises the issue ahead of delicate talks, including on the war in Ukraine and global trade, between the top U.S. diplomat and Chinese