Fri, Sep 02, 2011 - Page 7 News List

WikiLeaks accuses ‘Guardian’ of leaking password


Uncensored copies of WikiLeaks’ massive tome of US Department of State cables were yesterday circulating freely across the Internet, a dramatic development that leaves a new batch of US sources vulnerable to embarrassment and potential retribution.

WikiLeaks has blamed Britain’s Guardian newspaper for the breach, saying that an investigative journalist had revealed the password needed to unlock the files in a book published earlier this year. Guardian journalists said that sloppy security at Julian Assange’s anti-secrecy Web site helped expose the cables to the world.

In a 1,600-word-long editorial posted on the Internet, WikiLeaks accused Guardian investigative reporter David Leigh of betrayal, saying that his disclosure had jeopardized months of “careful work” WikiLeaks had undertaken to redact and publish the cables.

“Revolutions and reforms are in danger of being lost as the unpublished cables spread to intelligence contractors and governments before the public,” WikiLeaks said in its statement.

Leigh and the Guardian both denied wrongdoing, and the exact sequence of events WikiLeaks was referring to remained clouded in confusion and recriminations.

It has long been known that WikiLeaks lost control of the raw cables even before they were published. One copy of the secret documents leaked to the New York Times in the fall of last year and other media organizations, including The Associated Press (AP), have since received copies independently of WikiLeaks.

However, never before has the entire catalog of unredacted cables made its way to the Web.

Until recently, WikiLeaks released relatively small batches of files to its partner organizations — composed of dozens of international media and human rights groups — so that they could remove information that could put innocent people in jeopardy. Only then were the files posted online.

However, with the unredacted cables now being sloshed around in the public domain, all that work has effectively been thrown out the window.

In its statement, WikiLeaks laid the blame on the Guardian and an unnamed “German individual.”

Leigh said that WikiLeaks’ assertion was “time-wasting nonsense.”

He acknowledged that Assange had supplied him with a password needed to access the US embassy cables from a server back in July last year, but said that Assange told him the site would expire within a matter of hours.

“What we published much later in our book was obsolete and harmless,” Leigh said in an e-mail. “We did not disclose the URL [Web address] where the file was located, and in any event, Assange had told us it would no longer exist.”

“I don’t see how a member of the public could access such a file anyway, unless a WikiLeaks or ex-WikiLeaks person tells them where it is located and what the file was called,” Leigh added.

Another Guardian journalist who once worked for WikiLeaks said that Assange was to blame, alleging that Assange had recycled an old password when he republished the encrypted data later.

“Personal banking sites tell you not to reuse passwords. WikiLeaks doing the same for a file of such sensitivity is gross negligence,” James Ball said in a message posted on Twitter early yesterday.

Attempts to reach WikiLeaks staffers for further clarification were unsuccessful, although on its Twitter feed the group contested statements by Leigh and others, warning of “continuous lies to come.”

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top