China yesterday welcomed a Canadian court’s decision to extradite the nation’s most-wanted fugitive, but lawyers and rights activists have expressed doubt that he would receive a fair trial back home.
The Federal Court cleared the way on Thursday for the extradition of Lai Changxing (賴昌星) and he could be sent home as early as today, dismissing concerns that he could be tortured or executed once he arrives back in China.
Lai’s deportation would remove a thorn that has long plagued Sino-Canadian relations. Beijing has accused Lai of running a multibillion-dollar smuggling operation in the southeastern city of Xiamen in the 1990s in one of China’s biggest political scandals in decades.
Lai fled to Canada with his family in 1999 and claimed refugee status, saying the allegations against him were politically motivated.
“The Chinese government’s stance on Lai Changxing returning to China to stand trial is clear. We welcome the Canadian court’s decision,” the Chinese foreign ministry said in a statement.
The verdict was issued just after the visit of Canadian Foreign Minister John Baird to China, where he said: “Both the Canadian people and the Chinese people don’t have a lot of time for white collar fraudsters.”
China promised Canada in a diplomatic note that Lai would not be tortured or executed and that Canadian officials would have access to him.
“The fact that Canadian government officials appear willing to accept on face value the Chinese government’s assurances that it will respect due legal process suggests a near-willful ignorance of the sharp deterioration in China’s human rights environment since mid-February 2011,” said Phelim Kine, a researcher for New York-based Human Rights Watch, in an e-mail.
“[The] Canadian government’s confidence in the Chinese legal system is curious given that since mid-February 2011, rule of law has been under intensified attack and the Chinese government has been routinely deploying thuggish, unlawful tactics to harass, silence and intimidate lawyers, artists and civil society activists,” the statement said.
The case exploded in the special economic zone of Xiamen in southeastern Fujian province in the mid-1990s when Jia Qinglin (賈慶林), now China’s fourth-ranked official, was head of the province.
Beijing has accused Lai’s business empire, the Yuanhua Group, of bribing officials to allow a massive smuggling ring in a scandal that implicated more than 200 senior figures, including Jia’s wife at the time, Lin Youfang (林幼芳).
China put more than 300 suspects on trial and sentenced 14 to death, including provincial officials and a former Chinese vice minister of public security, in a case Beijing used to launch a propaganda campaign against corruption.
Lai admitted in a 2009 interview with Toronto’s Globe and Mail newspaper that he had avoided taxes by exploiting loopholes in the law, but denied bribery charges. He said that had he not been in Canada he would have been executed.
Canada has no death penalty and will not usually extradite anyone to a state where capital punishment is practiced without assurances the suspect will not be executed.
Many Chinese legal experts and human rights activists said it was unlikely Lai would receive a fair trial in China.
“Unless the investigators, prosecutors and judges he will confront dramatically alter their customary practices, Lai will not receive a fair trial by international human rights standards or Canadian criminal justice standards,” said Jerome Cohen, an expert in Chinese law at New York University. Cohen was called by the Canadian government as an expert witness at Lai’s refugee hearing several years ago.
“The real question is what detailed provisions has the PRC [People’s Republic of China] promised to make to assure Canada that there will be little risk of torture before Lai is convicted and during the undoubtedly long period of his prison sentence.”
Reflecting the intensity of China’s official position, state media in 2001 cited then-Chinese premier Zhu Rongji (朱鎔基) as saying Lai “should die three times, and even so that wouldn’t be enough.”
John Kamm, executive director of the Dui Hua Foundation, a US-based group that promotes prisoners’ rights in China, said in e-mailed comments: “Without a presumption of innocence — indeed with the presumption of guilt — how does one get a “fair trial?”
However, he said the offer to allow Canadian diplomats access to Lai should offer some protection. “If he were tortured or executed, the damage to Sino-Canadian relations would be massive and would no doubt deter other countries from extraditing suspects who allegedly committed capital crimes back to China,” he said.
Republican US lawmakers on Friday criticized US President Joe Biden’s administration after sanctioned Chinese telecoms equipment giant Huawei unveiled a laptop this week powered by an Intel artificial intelligence (AI) chip. The US placed Huawei on a trade restriction list in 2019 for contravening Iran sanctions, part of a broader effort to hobble Beijing’s technological advances. Placement on the list means the company’s suppliers have to seek a special, difficult-to-obtain license before shipping to it. One such license, issued by then-US president Donald Trump’s administration, has allowed Intel to ship central processors to Huawei for use in laptops since 2020. China hardliners
A top Vietnamese property tycoon was on Thursday sentenced to death in one of the biggest corruption cases in history, with an estimated US$27 billion in damages. A panel of three hand-picked jurors and two judges rejected all defense arguments by Truong My Lan, chair of major developer Van Thinh Phat, who was found guilty of swindling cash from Saigon Commercial Bank (SCB) over a decade. “The defendant’s actions ... eroded people’s trust in the leadership of the [Communist] Party and state,” read the verdict at the trial in Ho Chi Minh City. After the five-week trial, 85 others were also sentenced on
‘DELUSIONAL’: Targeting the families of Hamas’ leaders would not push the group to change its position or to give up its demands for Palestinians, Ismail Haniyeh said Israeli aircraft on Wednesday killed three sons of Hamas’ top political leader in the Gaza Strip, striking high-stakes targets at a time when Israel is holding delicate ceasefire negotiations with the militant group. Hamas said four of the leader’s grandchildren were also killed. Ismail Haniyeh’s sons are among the highest-profile figures to be killed in the war so far. Israel said they were Hamas operatives, and Haniyeh accused Israel of acting in “the spirit of revenge and murder.” The deaths threatened to strain the internationally mediated ceasefire talks, which appeared to gain steam in recent days even as the sides remain far
RAMPAGE: A Palestinian man was left dead after dozens of Israeli settlers searching for a missing 14-year-old boy stormed a village in the Israeli-occupied West Bank US President Joe Biden on Friday said he expected Iran to attack Israel “sooner, rather than later” and warned Tehran not to proceed. Asked by reporters about his message to Iran, Biden simply said: “Don’t,” underscoring Washington’s commitment to defend Israel. “We are devoted to the defense of Israel. We will support Israel. We will help defend Israel and Iran will not succeed,” he said. Biden said he would not divulge secure information, but said his expectation was that an attack could come “sooner, rather than later.” Israel braced on Friday for an attack by Iran or its proxies as warnings grew of