From a position of lonely authority, US President Barack Obama faces wrenching political and even moral dilemmas as he plots a troop drawdown in Afghanistan due to begin next month.
The White House insists Obama’s decision will be driven solely by battlefield dynamics, despite growing angst in Washington about the heavy human and economic sacrifice demanded by the nearly decade-long war.
Obama promised 18 months ago — when he announced a troop surge to push back the Taliban and buy time for Afghan political and security development — that next month: “Our troops will begin to come home.”
After months of fragile progress and a Washington turf war over the size of the withdrawal, that deadline is upon us.
Critics viewed Obama’s decision to name a drawdown date as an error sure to embolden Afghan fighters who follow a simple strategy tested over generations: waiting out foreign invaders.
However, Obama was under pressure to heed a war-weary US public and wanted to signal to the chaotic Afghan government that the US needed to “transition” out of the country.
The official line now is that “conditions on the ground” will frame the decision, prompting expectations of only a token drawdown of the 100,000-strong US force.
Now, with the US economic recovery struggling, Obama faces rising questions over both the cost of the nation-building effort and assumptions of eventual success built into US strategy.
In addition, the killing of Osama bin Laden in a special forces raid in Pakistan raises the question of whether a full-scale counterinsurgency in Afghanistan is the best way to keep the US boot on al-Qaeda’s neck.
The Pentagon, led by outgoing US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, seeks only a cautious drawdown from a war that has killed about 1,500 US troops.
Gates predicted in a farewell trip to Afghanistan that a “decisive blow” was imminent against the Taliban. US commanders claim progress against the militia in the south of the country and now want to take it on in the east.
Pentagon warnings have been accompanied by sympathetic pieces on the op-ed pages of -influential US newspapers, arguing that anything more than a token drawdown of perhaps 3,000 to 5,000 troops would be disastrous.
“If Mr Obama announces the withdrawal of all surge forces from Afghanistan in 2012, the war will likely be lost,” wrote academics Kimberly and Frederick Kagan in a Wall Street Journal editorial last week.
Politicians responsive to public opinion have doubts.
“Our current commitment in troops and in dollars is neither proportional to our interests nor sustainable,” Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry said.
Veteran Republican Senator Richard Lugar added: “Despite 10 years of investment and attempts to better understand the culture and the region’s actors, we remain in a cycle that produces relative progress, but fails to deliver a secure political or military resolution.”
In the face of hawkish calls for a negligible drawdown, influential US Senator Carl Levin has suggested a significant withdrawal of 15,000 US troops this year. The international community has agreed that authority will be fully turned over to Afghan forces in 2014.
Implicit in the dilemma facing Obama is one central question: If US forces will leave in three years anyway, do the potential gains justify the wagering of hundreds more US lives and billions more dollars?
White House officials privately say that there is a good chance that the US mission will produce the “good enough” Afghan government and security forces Ryan Crocker, Obama’s pick for US ambassador to Afghanistan, has talked about, but the stakes are a reminder of the immense pressures faced by the US commander-in-chief as he weighs political, military, diplomatic and humanitarian motives for US action.
However, Obama’s freedom of maneuver is constrained by a political clock.
When he seeks reelection next year, Obama will be under pressure to justify the Afghan mission and though aides insist strategy and not politics is the driving force of his decision, any drawdown that risks an explosion of Taliban momentum in the election season would be a political risk too far.
Nearly half of China’s major cities are suffering “moderate to severe” levels of subsidence, putting millions of people at risk of flooding, especially as sea levels rise, according to a study of nationwide satellite data released yesterday. The authors of the paper, published by the journal Science, found that 45 percent of China’s urban land was sinking faster than 3mm per year, with 16 percent at more than 10mm per year, driven not only by declining water tables, but also the sheer weight of the built environment. With China’s urban population already in excess of 900 million people, “even a small portion
‘IN A DIFFERENT PLACE’: The envoy first visited Shanghai, where he attended a Chinese basketball playoff match, and is to meet top officials in Beijing tomorrow US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday arrived in China on his second visit in a year as the US ramps up pressure on its rival over its support for Russia while also seeking to manage tensions with Beijing. The US diplomat tomorrow is to meet China’s top brass in Beijing, where he is also expected to plead for restraint as Taiwan inaugurates president-elect William Lai (賴清德), and to raise US concerns on Chinese trade practices. However, Blinken is also seeking to stabilize ties, with tensions between the world’s two largest economies easing since his previous visit in June last year. At the
UNSETTLING IMAGES: The scene took place in front of TV crews covering the Trump trial, with a CNN anchor calling it an ‘emotional and unbelievably disturbing moment’ A man who doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire outside the courthouse where former US president Donald Trump is on trial has died, police said yesterday. The New York City Police Department (NYPD) said the man was declared dead by staff at an area hospital. The man was in Collect Pond Park at about 1:30pm on Friday when he took out pamphlets espousing conspiracy theories, tossed them around, then doused himself in an accelerant and set himself on fire, officials and witnesses said. A large number of police officers were nearby when it happened. Some officers and bystanders rushed
Beijing is continuing to commit genocide and crimes against humanity against Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities in its western Xinjiang province, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a report published on Monday, ahead of his planned visit to China this week. The State Department’s annual human rights report, which documents abuses recorded all over the world during the previous calendar year, repeated language from previous years on the treatment of Muslims in Xinjiang, but the publication raises the issue ahead of delicate talks, including on the war in Ukraine and global trade, between the top U.S. diplomat and Chinese