Thu, May 12, 2011 - Page 7 News List

Chile approves dam in Patagonian wilderness

‘DESTRUCTIVE, ILLEGAL’:A project to dam two of the world’s wildest rivers for electricity has won approval despite public opposition, which stood at 61 percent

The Guardian, LONDON

Environmental supporters attend a rally in Valparaiso, about 121km northwest of Santiago, Chile, on Tuesday after a regional environmental commission approved a hydroelectricity dam project in an isolated area of fjords and valleys. The placard reads: “Open your eyes. No to HidroAysen.”

Photo: Reuters

Chilean authorities have approved a US$2.9 billion plan to dam two rivers in Patagonia for hydroelectricity, triggering angry protests and claims that swaths of pristine wilderness will be destroyed.

The HidroAysen project envisages five dams to tap the Baker and Pascua rivers, an isolated area of fjords and valleys, and generate 2.75 gigawatts of power for Chile’s booming economy.

The government has championed the dams as vital to poverty alleviation and growth, but public opinion is split, with many saying that the project is unnecessary and will devastate an ecological haven.

Police arrested dozens of protesters and clashed with hundreds more in Coihaique, a Patagonian city where on Monday a government-appointed commission voted 11 to 1 in favor of the dams after a three-year environmental review.

The commissioners were kept indoors for their own safety as people threw rocks and battled police with water cannon and tear gas. Similar scenes unfolded in the capital, Santiago.

The Patagonia Without Dams advocacy group accused the commissioners of conflicts of interest and said the project was “destructive and illegal.” It said the dams would flood at least 5,600 hectares of rare forest ecosystems, river valleys and farmland.

“We are outraged. We are calling on [Chilean] President [Sebastian] Pinera to overturn this decision and protect Patagonia,” said Patricio Rodrigo, the group’s executive secretary.

Critics say the project would drown the habitat of the endangered southern huemul deer, a national symbol.

An Ipsos poll found 61 percent of Chileans opposed the dams. The polarization offered a sharp contrast to the nation’s feel-good glow after last year’s rescue of 31 trapped miners, which boosted the president’s ratings.

Chilean Environment Minister Maria Ignacia Benitez denied the commission’s findings were a stitch-up in favor of energy corporations and banks. The “very demanding” investigation adhered to laws and took into account the environmental impact, she told Radio Agricultura.

HidroAysen said that the dams would provide cheap and clean electricity in comparison to oil and coal. Chile recently approved three coal plants.

Chilean Interior Minister Rodrigo Hinzpeter told reporters “the most important thing is that our country needs to grow, to progress, and for this we need energy.”

Some analysts say Chile will need to triple its energy capacity in the next 15 years to feed fast-growing industries and cities. The country imports 97 percent of its fossil fuel needs and relies mainly on hydropower for electricity, leaving it vulnerable to oil shocks and drought.

The council of ministers is expected to nod through the proposed dams, but activists hope to win concessions in the environmental impact assessment for the next phase of the project: 1,900km transmission lines, estimated to cost US$3.8 billion, to bring electricity Santiago.

That review, due in December, could sharply restrict the number of lines or open Patagonia to multiple lines, roads and possibly more dams.

Much of the controversy hinges on whether Chile has viable alternative means to boost power capacity. With nuclear power widely considered an anathema, some tout the Atacama Desert as a source of immense solar thermal production, given its relative proximity to mines and industry.

This story has been viewed 1932 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top