Osama bin Laden’s death helps clear the way for a political settlement in Afghanistan by making it easier for the Taliban to sever ties with al-Qaeda.
However, many other obstacles remain in reaching a negotiated end to the Afghan war, including regional rivalry and competing demands of different groups inside Afghanistan.
“Things are falling into their correct place,” said one Pakistani official, who declined to be named. “Osama bin Laden’s killing may lead us toward an end-game.”
Photo: Reuters
“I do think that this opens the door to push for a political settlement; that depends, however, on [US] President [Barack] Obama choosing to take the opportunity,” Joshua Foust said at the American Security Project in Washington.
US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said in February that Washington wanted “to move this conflict toward a political outcome that shatters the alliance between the Taliban and al-Qaeda, ends the insurgency,” and stabilizes Afghanistan.
The US wants the Taliban to break with al-Qaeda, as well as renouncing violence and respecting the Afghan constitution.
“These are not pre-conditions, these are end-conditions,” said a Western official. “We are getting out the message. We can’t do this too often. Come in and talk.”
Official sources have said Washington has already begun talks with the Taliban, an effort which is matched, some Afghan analysts say, by a willingness on the part of the Islamist movement to break ties with al-Qaeda.
However, it has been unclear how the Taliban would be expected to make this break — a public renunciation would be one thing; actively turning over former allies to the US would be much harder.
Bin Laden’s death may have helped resolve that problem.
“It will be easier for the Taliban to distance itself from al-Qaeda after bin Laden’s death,” Gilles Dorronsoro wrote in a post at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
In a report that has acquired new relevance after bin Laden’s death, international experts at The Century Foundation said in March that one way to make the break would be for the Taliban to declare an end to the more than 30 years of jihad in Afghanistan that began with the Soviet invasion in 1979.
In a post on The Century Foundation Web site, foreign policy specialist Jeffrey Laurenti said the death of bin Laden, with whom Mullah Omar had shared personal ties, made that easier.
“The Taliban inner circle has long debated the wisdom of the movement’s alignment with al-Qaeda, but the high esteem in which the Taliban ‘commander of the faithful,’ Mullah Mohammed Omar, was said to hold bin Laden as a pious Muslim warrior has long been decisive in squelching any talk of a divorce,” he said. “We cannot know if Mullah Omar’s determination not to betray bin Laden will prove as fierce for any successor.”
US Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan Marc Grossman, speaking after a meeting in Islamabad with officials from both countries, also stressed the need to follow up Clinton’s call in February for a political settlement.
“Today, our discussion focused on how we can make Afghan reconciliation successful,” he said.
However, while the US launched its military campaign in 2001 to hunt down al-Qaeda, it is far from clear that the decapitation of the Islamist group and its likely subsequent disarray is enough now to stabilize Afghanistan.
There is as yet no evidence the Taliban could act as counter-party to a settlement that allowed for power-sharing between insurgents and those now in power in Afghanistan.
Western officials say they do not enjoy enough broad support in Afghanistan to be treated as the kind of representative nationalist insurgency with whom a deal could be struck.
And so far, there are no signs the Taliban would be ready to strike a deal that gave them less than their demands for a withdrawal of foreign troops and imposition of Shariah law.
“There are lots of feelers out there, but none of them have yet developed into anything authoritative,” one Western official said, speaking before the news of bin Laden’s death.
The insurgency itself is fragmented, both within the original Taliban movement and between them and other groups like fighters led by Gulbuddin Hekmatyar and the Haqqani network.
So far, the US is talking only to representatives of the original Taliban movement, and based on what little has been said about these talks, substantive progress remains elusive.
Western officials and many analysts also say Afghanistan, with a weak central government and big problems of governance, cannot be stabilized easily, even if a political settlement were to be reached. And that leaves it exposed to competing regional powers — including Pakistan and India.
Islamabad insists it is not aiming to install a Taliban government in Kabul, seeking instead an end to the instability that has spilled over into Pakistan itself.
Pakistani sources have said repeatedly over the past year that it wants a stable Afghanistan — neither one hostile to its interests, nor a client state run by the Taliban and Pakistan-friendly Pashtuns.
After so many bombings, Pakistan has had what one Western official described as an “epiphany” in its attitude to Islamist militants.
However, Pakistan has yet to convince many in India.
India has renewed peace talks with Pakistan broken off after the 2008 attack on Mumbai by Pakistan-based militants.
However, bin Laden’s death raised worries that it would allow the US to make a quick exit from Afghanistan.
“Washington will seek plausible reassurances that after it leaves, Afghanistan will not play host to terrorists targeting the United States,” said Nitin Pai, founder of Takshashila Institution, an Indian thinktank. “It might retain some troops and drones in Afghanistan just in case it needs to use a stick. That apart, it will accede to Pakistani demands that Kabul be made over to a pro-Pakistani regime.”
Republican US lawmakers on Friday criticized US President Joe Biden’s administration after sanctioned Chinese telecoms equipment giant Huawei unveiled a laptop this week powered by an Intel artificial intelligence (AI) chip. The US placed Huawei on a trade restriction list in 2019 for contravening Iran sanctions, part of a broader effort to hobble Beijing’s technological advances. Placement on the list means the company’s suppliers have to seek a special, difficult-to-obtain license before shipping to it. One such license, issued by then-US president Donald Trump’s administration, has allowed Intel to ship central processors to Huawei for use in laptops since 2020. China hardliners
A top Vietnamese property tycoon was on Thursday sentenced to death in one of the biggest corruption cases in history, with an estimated US$27 billion in damages. A panel of three hand-picked jurors and two judges rejected all defense arguments by Truong My Lan, chair of major developer Van Thinh Phat, who was found guilty of swindling cash from Saigon Commercial Bank (SCB) over a decade. “The defendant’s actions ... eroded people’s trust in the leadership of the [Communist] Party and state,” read the verdict at the trial in Ho Chi Minh City. After the five-week trial, 85 others were also sentenced on
Conjoined twins Lori and George Schappell, who pursued separate careers, interests and relationships during lives that defied medical expectations, died this month in Pennsylvania, funeral home officials said. They were 62. The twins, listed by Guinness World Records as the oldest living conjoined twins, died on April 7 at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, obituaries posted by Leibensperger Funeral Homes of Hamburg said. The cause of death was not detailed. “When we were born, the doctors didn’t think we’d make 30, but we proved them wrong,” Lori said in an interview when they turned 50, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported. The
RAMPAGE: A Palestinian man was left dead after dozens of Israeli settlers searching for a missing 14-year-old boy stormed a village in the Israeli-occupied West Bank US President Joe Biden on Friday said he expected Iran to attack Israel “sooner, rather than later” and warned Tehran not to proceed. Asked by reporters about his message to Iran, Biden simply said: “Don’t,” underscoring Washington’s commitment to defend Israel. “We are devoted to the defense of Israel. We will support Israel. We will help defend Israel and Iran will not succeed,” he said. Biden said he would not divulge secure information, but said his expectation was that an attack could come “sooner, rather than later.” Israel braced on Friday for an attack by Iran or its proxies as warnings grew of